Agriculture withdraws roughly 70% of the world’s fresh water, and consumes a higher share still — irrigation water is largely transpired by crops and evaporated from soil, so it leaves the catchment rather than returning to it. Any serious conversation about water use is mostly a conversation about farming.

Agricultural share of freshwater withdrawal
In many arid and low-income countries agriculture takes over 90% of all water withdrawn.
Agricultural share of freshwater withdrawalSomalia: 99.5%. Afghanistan: 98.2%. Nepal: 98.1%. Mali: 97.9%. Sudan: 96.2%. Laos: 95.9%. Madagascar: 95.9%. Vietnam: 94.8% and 17 more.050100%SomaliaSomalia: 99.5%99.5AfghanistanAfghanistan: 98.2%98.2NepalNepal: 98.1%98.1MaliMali: 97.9%97.9SudanSudan: 96.2%96.2LaosLaos: 95.9%95.9MadagascarMadagascar: 95.9%95.9VietnamVietnam: 94.8%94.8EritreaEritrea: 94.5%94.5GuyanaGuyana: 94.3%94.3EswatiniEswatini: 94.2%94.2BhutanBhutan: 94.1%94.1CambodiaCambodia: 94.0%94PakistanPakistan: 94.0%94TurkmenistanTurkmenistan: 92.7%92.7KyrgyzstanKyrgyzstan: 92.7%92.7AzerbaijanAzerbaijan: 92.2%92.2IranIran: 92.2%92.2UzbekistanUzbekistan: 92.1%92.1EthiopiaEthiopia: 91.8%91.8Timor-LesteTimor-Leste: 91.4%91.4SenegalSenegal: 91.3%91.3NigerNiger: 91.0%91ChileChile: 90.9%90.9YemenYemen: 90.7%90.7

A high agricultural share reflects the size and irrigation intensity of the farming sector rather than inefficiency. Countries at the top of any such ranking are typically food producers in arid regions.

View the data behind this chart
SubjectValue (%)Notes
Somalia99.5
Afghanistan98.2
Nepal98.1
Mali97.9
Sudan96.2
Laos95.9
Madagascar95.9
Vietnam94.8
Eritrea94.5
Guyana94.3
Eswatini94.2
Bhutan94.1
Cambodia94.0
Pakistan94.0
Turkmenistan92.7
Kyrgyzstan92.7
Azerbaijan92.2
Iran92.2
Uzbekistan92.1
Ethiopia91.8
Timor-Leste91.4
Senegal91.3
Niger91.0
Chile90.9
Yemen90.7

How irrigation water is actually used

Only a fraction of the water applied to a field is transpired by the crop. The rest evaporates from the soil surface, percolates below the root zone, or runs off the end of the field. Field application efficiency ranges from roughly 50% for surface flood irrigation to over 90% for well-managed drip.

Open the calculator

The irrigation efficiency paradox

This does not mean drip irrigation is a bad idea — it raises yields, reduces energy use for pumping and cuts salinisation. It does mean that installing it does not, by itself, leave more water in the river, and policies that assume otherwise have repeatedly failed to deliver the savings they promised.

Groundwater and the pump

Roughly 40% of global irrigated area is groundwater-fed. Where electricity for pumping is subsidised or unmetered, the marginal cost of another cubic metre is close to zero — which is the underlying economics of groundwater depletion in northern India, the North China Plain and the western United States.

The resulting problem is a classic common-pool one: each individual well has an imperceptible effect, the collective effect is severe, and every abstractor faces an incentive to pump before their neighbours do. Solving it requires either metering and pricing, or enforceable collective limits — both politically difficult.

Water quality, not just quantity

  • Nitrate leaching to groundwater, which takes decades to arrive and decades to clear
  • Phosphorus carried on eroded soil into watercourses, driving eutrophication
  • Pesticides and their metabolites, regulated in Europe at a precautionary 0.1 µg/l
  • Salinisation, where irrigation in arid regions concentrates salts in the soil — the mechanism that has degraded irrigated land since Mesopotamia
  • Sediment from bare soil, which smothers spawning gravels
Agricultural runoff pathways

Nutrients and pesticides reach water by several routes with very different timescales — which is why land management changes take decades to show up in groundwater.

Agricultural runoff pathwaysFertiliser and manure applied to fields reach water three ways. Surface runoff carries phosphorus attached to soil particles into streams within hours of heavy rain. Field drains carry dissolved nitrate to watercourses within days. Leaching carries nitrate down through the soil and unsaturated zone into groundwater, taking years to decades. Each pathway delivers different pollutants on a different timescale.Soil and unsaturated zoneGroundwaterFertiliser and manureSurface runoffhours — phosphorusField drainsdays — nitrateLeachingyears to decades — nitrateStreameutrophicationRiverAquiferlegacy nitrate
Phosphorus travels with soil
It binds to particles, so it arrives with sediment during storm runoff. Controlling erosion controls phosphorus.
Nitrate travels with water
It is highly soluble and not retained by soil, so it leaches downward with drainage. Nothing stops it once it is below the root zone.
The legacy problem
Nitrate now arriving in a thick chalk aquifer was applied decades ago. Improving practice today will not show in the borehole for a generation.

Sources

More on water use