The monitoring network within this area

Hydrionis holds 4,143 values from 6 gauges within it. Discharge is a property of a gauge and its reach, not of this drainage area, so this page reports the network and its records rather than a single figure.

6
Gauges
4,143
Values held
1904–2026
Record spans
Gauges within the Upper Weber huc8 subbasin
6 monitoring points, positioned as the publisher records them.
Gauges within the Upper Weber huc8 subbasinCHALK CREEK AT COALVILLE, UT, WEBER RIVER AT ECHO, UT, WEBER RIVER NEAR OAKLEY, UT, WEBER RIVER NEAR COALVILLE, UT, LOST CREEK NEAR CROYDON, UTAH, LOST CREEK AT DEVILS SLIDE, UTAHCHALK CREEK AT COALVILLE, UTWEBER RIVER AT ECHO, UTWEBER RIVER NEAR OAKLEY, UTWEBER RIVER NEAR COALVILLE, UTLOST CREEK NEAR CROYDON, UTAHLOST CREEK AT DEVILS SLIDE, UTAH

Flood peaks, as measured

This gauge's flood record, as measured. Unlike a daily mean it is the discharge at the moment the river was highest, which is the figure flood frequency analysis is built on.

Largest measured flow of each year at WEBER RIVER NEAR OAKLEY, UT
The highest instantaneous discharge the publisher recorded in each year — a flood peak as measured, not a daily average of one. 1905–2025.
Shading marks when something was recorded, not what caused the line.
Largest measured flow of each year at WEBER RIVER NEAR OAKLEY, UTLargest measured flow of each year at WEBER RIVER NEAR OAKLEY, UT: WEBER RIVER NEAR OAKLEY, UT in m³/s, from 1905 to 2025.Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapse050100m³/s19051920193519501965198019952010

Published by the gauge's own operator from its sub-daily record; Hydrionis stores the figure rather than recomputing it. A year the gauge did not cover produces no value rather than a low one, and the gaps are stated below the chart. A peak is a property of this gauge and its reach: a larger flood upstream or downstream of it is not in this series.

What the shaded periods are (1 event)

A shaded period marks when something was recorded, not what caused the shape of the line. Where the two coincide, they coincided.

Documented record — A documented event, compiled from cited sources after it happened. The dates are as good as the record, which for older events can mean the month rather than the day.

EventTypePeriodStandingAuthority
Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapseFlood2005-08-29 – 2005-09-30Documented record
Compiled record

Not shown on this chart

  • The 1976 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • The 2022 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Yorkshire drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cantareira water crisis, São Paulo — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cape Town Day Zero — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • European drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodWEBER RIVER NEAR OAKLEY, UT (m³/s)
190544.7
190670.2
190799.1
190859.7
190999.1
191050.7
191158.9
191295.4
191347.9
191465.4
191534.8
191654.9
191778.2
191859.7
191944.7
192066.3
1921118
192283.0
192358.3
192436.5
192536.5
192645.6
192750.7
192855.8
192948.4
193042.8
193128.0
193262.3
193362.3
193417.3
193590.3
193667.1
193754.1
193859.5
193923.3
194033.4
194132.8
194248.7
194344.2
194444.5
194534.0
194641.3
194737.9
194853.5
194949.8
195060.6
195171.1
195264.6
195371.9
195435.7
195543.9
195654.9
195772.5
195849.3
195936.5
196038.2
196124.4
196244.2
196332.3
196450.1
196560.0
196642.2
196756.1
196856.4
196951.5
197041.3
197164.8
197253.0
197352.1
197456.9
197567.4
197637.9
197723.4
197860.0
197957.5
198051.8
198154.9
198246.7
198367.4
198472.5
198556.4
1986100
198730.0
198827.2
198928.0
199075.3
199168.0
199218.1
199359.5
199432.3
199575.6
199660.6
199763.1
199849.3
199966.8
200043.6
200150.7
200231.4
200355.2
200421.7
200571.1
200646.7
200733.4
200862.3
200948.7
2010100.0
201197.1
201221.0
201324.0
201454.1
201531.1
201649.3
201779.6
201827.3
201964.8
202049.0
202117.1
202244.7
202360.9
202530.3

About this series

Everything below is a property of the data rather than a rating of it. There is deliberately no single confidence score: how much a gap matters depends on what you are about to do with the series, and only you know that.

Source
United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain
How the values came to existMeasured
Period held1905–2025
Completeness99.2% of the periods in that span are held. Gaps are drawn as breaks and never interpolated.
Known gaps
  • One period inside 1905–2025 holds no value: 2024. It is drawn as a break in the line and is never interpolated across.
ContinuityThe record begins in 1905 and is not continuous from it: 121 years separate the first value from the last, and 99% of the years between them are held. The span is not the record.
Last read from the publisher2026-10-01
RedistributionPermitted by the upstream licences
Commercial reusePermitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this.
MethodologyHow this was produced

How much of the rain came back out

A discharge in cubic metres per second cannot be compared with anything: the larger number may only mean the larger catchment. Divided by the area draining to the gauge it becomes a depth of water over that land, which answers a question a reader already has — of the rain that fell here, how much came back out as river?

Water leaving the catchment above WEBER RIVER NEAR OAKLEY, UT, as a depth
The year's flow spread over the land draining to this gauge, in millimetres — the same unit rainfall is measured in. 1905–2025.
Shading marks when something was recorded, not what caused the line.
Water leaving the catchment above WEBER RIVER NEAR OAKLEY, UT, as a depthWater leaving the catchment above WEBER RIVER NEAR OAKLEY, UT, as a depth: WEBER RIVER NEAR OAKLEY, UT in mm, from 1905 to 2025.Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapse02505007501,000mm19051921193719531969198520012017

Computed by Hydrionis from the published annual mean flow and the catchment area the station's own publisher states. It is not a water balance: the difference between rainfall and runoff is not evaporation alone but also change in groundwater storage, water abstracted and taken elsewhere, and water imported by transfer schemes — which is why a catchment can yield more runoff than the rain that fell on it without anything being measured wrongly. A different area figure rescales every value here by the ratio between them.

What the shaded periods are (1 event)

A shaded period marks when something was recorded, not what caused the shape of the line. Where the two coincide, they coincided.

Documented record — A documented event, compiled from cited sources after it happened. The dates are as good as the record, which for older events can mean the month rather than the day.

EventTypePeriodStandingAuthority
Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapseFlood2005-08-29 – 2005-09-30Documented record
Compiled record

Not shown on this chart

  • The 1976 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • The 2022 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Yorkshire drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cantareira water crisis, São Paulo — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cape Town Day Zero — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • European drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodWEBER RIVER NEAR OAKLEY, UT (mm)
1905344
1906554
1907888
1908474
1909820
1910518
1911548
1912612
1913494
1914701
1915410
1916599
1917675
1918443
1919355
1920592
1921790
1922676
1923599
1924311
1925425
1926376
1927505
1928483
1929532
1930396
1931216
1932541
1933400
1934163
1935425
1936533
1937381
1938460
1939306
1940270
1941363
1942424
1943456
1944474
1945394
1946428
1947462
1948411
1949474
1950590
1951512
1952630
1953401
1954295
1955344
1956489
1957510
1958369
1959333
1960316
1961207
1962488
1963359
1964452
1965627
1966384
1967558
1968521
1969531
1970436
1971537
1972507
1973446
1974511
1975588
1976382
1977166
1978484
1979344
1980461
1981369
1982632
1983705
1984680
1985527
1986795
1987295
1988268
1989345
1990329
1991375
1992209
1993604
1994326
1995637
1996516
1997595
1998577
1999524
2000316
2001284
2002278
2003332
2004282
2005518
2006476
2007308
2008468
2009500
2010407
2011793
2012260
2013268
2014392
2015321
2016391
2017599
2018263
2019490
2020351
2021220
2022368
2023604
2024465
2025308

About this series

Everything below is a property of the data rather than a rating of it. There is deliberately no single confidence score: how much a gap matters depends on what you are about to do with the series, and only you know that.

Source
United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain
How the values came to existDerived Computed by Hydrionis
Period held1905–2025
Completeness100.0% of the periods in that span are held.
ContinuityContinuous: every year from 1905 to 2025 is held.
Inputs last read2026-10-01 · when the records this was computed from were last read from their publishers
Calculation date2026-08-24 · when the calculation method was last versioned, not a reading of any publisher
RedistributionPermitted by the upstream licences
Commercial reusePermitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this.
MethodologyHow this was produced

The snow standing above this water

7 automated snow stations sit inside this drainage area, weighing the snowpack rather than measuring how deep it is.

1,093
Fullest snowpack recorded at Chalk Creek #1, in 1986 (mm of water)
327
Thinnest, in 2015 (mm of water)
April
Month the pack is usually at its fullest
June
Month the pack has gone by, in half of years
Peak snowpack at Chalk Creek #1
Water years 1979–2026. Each point is the fullest month of that snow season.
Peak snowpack at Chalk Creek #1Peak snowpack at Chalk Creek #1: Chalk Creek #1 in mm, from 1979 to 2026.05001,000mm19791985199119972003200920152021Chalk Creek #1 1979: 531 mmChalk Creek #1 1980: 745 mmChalk Creek #1 1981: 468 mmChalk Creek #1 1982: 879 mmChalk Creek #1 1983: 922 mmChalk Creek #1 1984: 661 mmChalk Creek #1 1985: 597 mmChalk Creek #1 1986: 1,093 mmChalk Creek #1 1987: 513 mmChalk Creek #1 1988: 473 mmChalk Creek #1 1989: 690 mmChalk Creek #1 1990: 445 mmChalk Creek #1 1991: 619 mmChalk Creek #1 1992: 451 mmChalk Creek #1 1993: 903 mmChalk Creek #1 1994: 599 mmChalk Creek #1 1995: 771 mmChalk Creek #1 1996: 746 mmChalk Creek #1 1997: 841 mmChalk Creek #1 1998: 636 mmChalk Creek #1 1999: 695 mmChalk Creek #1 2000: 538 mmChalk Creek #1 2001: 476 mmChalk Creek #1 2002: 493 mmChalk Creek #1 2003: 459 mmChalk Creek #1 2004: 428 mmChalk Creek #1 2005: 690 mmChalk Creek #1 2006: 786 mmChalk Creek #1 2007: 478 mmChalk Creek #1 2008: 726 mmChalk Creek #1 2009: 701 mmChalk Creek #1 2010: 543 mmChalk Creek #1 2011: 1,038 mmChalk Creek #1 2012: 370 mmChalk Creek #1 2013: 517 mmChalk Creek #1 2014: 561 mmChalk Creek #1 2015: 327 mmChalk Creek #1 2016: 468 mmChalk Creek #1 2017: 844 mmChalk Creek #1 2018: 354 mmChalk Creek #1 2019: 678 mmChalk Creek #1 2020: 524 mmChalk Creek #1 2021: 383 mmChalk Creek #1 2022: 474 mmChalk Creek #1 2023: 884 mmChalk Creek #1 2024: 593 mmChalk Creek #1 2025: 459 mmChalk Creek #1 2026: 335 mm

A water year runs October to September and is named for the year it ends, so the snow of one winter stays in one point. The value is the fullest month, not the fullest day: a pack that peaked sharply mid-month reads lower here than a single measurement taken at the right moment would.

View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodChalk Creek #1 (mm)
1979531
1980745
1981468
1982879
1983922
1984661
1985597
19861,093
1987513
1988473
1989690
1990445
1991619
1992451
1993903
1994599
1995771
1996746
1997841
1998636
1999695
2000538
2001476
2002493
2003459
2004428
2005690
2006786
2007478
2008726
2009701
2010543
20111,038
2012370
2013517
2014561
2015327
2016468
2017844
2018354
2019678
2020524
2021383
2022474
2023884
2024593
2025459
2026335

Read against the river

Chalk Creek #1 and CHALK CREEK AT COALVILLE, UT both sit in this drainage area, and their records overlap by 46 years. That is the span the two have in common, not a count of years both actually hold — either record may have gaps inside it. The two are shown separately rather than on one axis: millimetres of stored water and cubic metres per second are not commensurable, and a difference between them would mean nothing.

Being in the same drainage area does not put the snowpack upstream of the gauge. A subbasin is an area, and snow on one tributary can join the river below a gauge on another — so a weak relationship here may say more about which tributary was measured than about the snow.

Every gauge Hydrionis holds within this area

Gauges within the Upper Weber and what each holds
GaugeMeasuresValuesRecord
WEBER RIVER NEAR OAKLEY, UTburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year3991904–2026
CHALK CREEK AT COALVILLE, UTburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year3321905–2026
WEBER RIVER NEAR COALVILLE, UTburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year2701927–2026
WEBER RIVER AT ECHO, UTburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year2211927–2026
LOST CREEK NEAR CROYDON, UTAHcatchment area, annual maximum river flow431921–2026
LOST CREEK AT DEVILS SLIDE, UTAHcatchment area, annual maximum river flow161905–2026

How these gauges were attached to this water

Assigned by the publisher to a numbered basin Every gauge here is assigned to this drainage area by its own publisher, which issues the area an official code — 16020101. A drainage area is not a river: it contains the tributaries as well as the main channel, and a gauge in it may be on any of them.

What each gauge’s link to this water rests on
GaugeEvidenceEstablished
WEBER RIVER NEAR OAKLEY, UTStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
CHALK CREEK AT COALVILLE, UTStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
WEBER RIVER NEAR COALVILLE, UTStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
WEBER RIVER AT ECHO, UTStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
LOST CREEK NEAR CROYDON, UTAHStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
LOST CREEK AT DEVILS SLIDE, UTAHStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02

What this record holds

Hydrionis decides which waters get a page, and which of those are offered to search, from what is actually held rather than from how the page reads. Five signals are counted; this record has 5 of them, which makes it a full profile.

Information-gain signals held for this water body
SignalHeldCounts
Gauges holding a real record4yes, 3 or more
Years spanned123yes, 20 or more
Values held4,143yes, 1000 or more
Distinct measurements6yes, 2 or more
Publishers measuring it2yes, 2 or more
Official identifiers1recorded, not counted

Use this data

Use this data

No bulk download is offered here, which is a licence position rather than a product one: at least one contributing publisher does not permit redistribution. The values can be read on the page, cited, and pointed to at source.

Attribution and citation

Suggested citation for Hydrionis

Hydrionis (2026), Upper Weber gauge records, accessed 2026-10-05, hydrionis.com/waters/united-states-upper-weber/

Cite Hydrionis where you rely on values Hydrionis computed, on the method that produced them, or on the compilation itself. The underlying measurements remain the publishers’ and their attribution requirements apply to you directly.

Recommended, not required. Hydrionis does not claim rights over unmodified public data it relayed, and doing arithmetic on somebody else’s measurements does not make them Hydrionis’s. Cite the version and the access date: the Upper Weber gauge records changes as publishers release and as methods are revised, and a citation without both cannot be checked later. Full guidance is on cite and reuse.

None of the contributing licences requires attribution. Crediting the publishers is still good practice and they are listed above.

Where these figures come from

MeasuredHigh confidence2025-05-30

Source: USGS — National Water Information System, USGS site 10128500, annual peak streamflow. Licence: Open.

Method: The instantaneous maximum discharge of each water year as published by USGS, dated to the day it occurred. One value per October-to-September water year; where the publisher lists both a systematic and a historic peak for a year, the larger is the annual maximum. Values the publisher marks as maximum daily averages are not held here, because they are not instantaneous peaks. Values marked as bounded rather than measured are held as censored observations carrying the bound. Cubic feet per second are converted to cubic metres per second and the publisher unit is recorded alongside.

Rating curves are extrapolated at extreme discharges, so the largest values in a peak series carry the largest measurement uncertainty. Data from the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System, a work of the United States government and therefore in the public domain.

Retrieved 1 October 2026.