The monitoring network within this area

Hydrionis holds 2,321 values from 6 gauges within it. Discharge is a property of a gauge and its reach, not of this drainage area, so this page reports the network and its records rather than a single figure.

6
Gauges
2,321
Values held
1890–2026
Record spans
Gauges within the Upper Missouri huc8 subbasin
6 monitoring points, positioned as the publisher records them.
Gauges within the Upper Missouri huc8 subbasinTenmile Creek near Helena MT, Missouri River at Toston MT, Prickly Pear Creek near Clancy MT, Tenmile Creek near Rimini MT, Crow Creek near Radersburg MT, Missouri River bl Hauser Dam near Helena MTTenmile Creek near Helena MTMissouri River at Toston MTPrickly Pear Creek near Clancy MTTenmile Creek near Rimini MTCrow Creek near Radersburg MTMissouri River bl Hauser Dam near Helena MT

Flood peaks, as measured

This gauge's flood record, as measured. Unlike a daily mean it is the discharge at the moment the river was highest, which is the figure flood frequency analysis is built on.

Largest measured flow of each year at Tenmile Creek near Rimini MT
The highest instantaneous discharge the publisher recorded in each year — a flood peak as measured, not a daily average of one. 1915–2024.
Shading marks when something was recorded, not what caused the line.
Largest measured flow of each year at Tenmile Creek near Rimini MTLargest measured flow of each year at Tenmile Creek near Rimini MT: Tenmile Creek near Rimini MT in m³/s, from 1915 to 2024.Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapse0255075100m³/s19151929194319571971198520012015

Published by the gauge's own operator from its sub-daily record; Hydrionis stores the figure rather than recomputing it. A year the gauge did not cover produces no value rather than a low one, and the gaps are stated below the chart. A peak is a property of this gauge and its reach: a larger flood upstream or downstream of it is not in this series.

What the shaded periods are (1 event)

A shaded period marks when something was recorded, not what caused the shape of the line. Where the two coincide, they coincided.

Documented record — A documented event, compiled from cited sources after it happened. The dates are as good as the record, which for older events can mean the month rather than the day.

EventTypePeriodStandingAuthority
Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapseFlood2005-08-29 – 2005-09-30Documented record
Compiled record

Not shown on this chart

  • The 1976 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • The 2022 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Yorkshire drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cantareira water crisis, São Paulo — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cape Town Day Zero — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • European drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodTenmile Creek near Rimini MT (m³/s)
191513.3
19168.38
191722.1
19184.87
19192.27
19208.47
192110.6
192210.9
19234.90
192410.4
19254.90
19265.66
192719.9
19287.05
192911.3
19305.07
19311.16
19325.52
19337.31
19344.05
19352.29
19361.87
19373.79
193813.9
19393.85
19402.72
19415.92
19426.85
19438.41
19447.16
19456.54
19462.07
19479.57
194811.4
19493.03
19509.03
19518.18
19526.85
195313.3
19543.14
19554.11
19566.20
19574.11
19586.12
19595.72
19607.76
19615.27
19626.29
19634.30
196415.9
19656.97
19664.02
19679.06
19687.87
19698.72
19706.17
19715.01
19725.78
19733.11
19746.23
197528.2
197610.7
19770.821
19786.71
19796.63
19805.89
198193.2
19827.14
19837.16
19846.34
19853.14
19865.72
19874.11
19883.74
19895.21
19903.82
19914.84
19925.15
19935.61
19945.47
19978.66
19986.29
19996.06
20000.821
20013.48
20023.77
20035.47
20042.07
20056.43
20065.72
20073.34
20086.00
20099.46
20109.15
201121.0
20125.64
20133.06
20147.90
20155.27
20163.94
20173.71
201823.0
20196.97
20208.10
20213.43
20225.95
20242.77

About this series

Everything below is a property of the data rather than a rating of it. There is deliberately no single confidence score: how much a gap matters depends on what you are about to do with the series, and only you know that.

Source
United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain
How the values came to existMeasured
Period held1915–2024
Completeness97.3% of the periods in that span are held. Gaps are drawn as breaks and never interpolated.
Known gaps
  • 2 separate periods inside 1915–2024 hold no value. The longest runs from 1995 to 1996 — 2 years with no reading. They are drawn as breaks in the line and are never interpolated across.
ContinuityThe record begins in 1915 and is not continuous from it: 110 years separate the first value from the last, and 97% of the years between them are held. The span is not the record.
Last read from the publisher2026-10-01
RedistributionPermitted by the upstream licences
Commercial reusePermitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this.
MethodologyHow this was produced

How much of the rain came back out

A discharge in cubic metres per second cannot be compared with anything: the larger number may only mean the larger catchment. Divided by the area draining to the gauge it becomes a depth of water over that land, which answers a question a reader already has — of the rain that fell here, how much came back out as river?

Water leaving the catchment above Tenmile Creek near Rimini MT, as a depth
The year's flow spread over the land draining to this gauge, in millimetres — the same unit rainfall is measured in. 1915–2024.
Shading marks when something was recorded, not what caused the line.
Water leaving the catchment above Tenmile Creek near Rimini MT, as a depthWater leaving the catchment above Tenmile Creek near Rimini MT, as a depth: Tenmile Creek near Rimini MT in mm, from 1915 to 2024.Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapse0200400600mm19151929194319571971198520032017

Computed by Hydrionis from the published annual mean flow and the catchment area the station's own publisher states. It is not a water balance: the difference between rainfall and runoff is not evaporation alone but also change in groundwater storage, water abstracted and taken elsewhere, and water imported by transfer schemes — which is why a catchment can yield more runoff than the rain that fell on it without anything being measured wrongly. A different area figure rescales every value here by the ratio between them.

What the shaded periods are (1 event)

A shaded period marks when something was recorded, not what caused the shape of the line. Where the two coincide, they coincided.

Documented record — A documented event, compiled from cited sources after it happened. The dates are as good as the record, which for older events can mean the month rather than the day.

EventTypePeriodStandingAuthority
Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapseFlood2005-08-29 – 2005-09-30Documented record
Compiled record

Not shown on this chart

  • The 1976 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • The 2022 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Yorkshire drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cantareira water crisis, São Paulo — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cape Town Day Zero — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • European drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodTenmile Creek near Rimini MT (mm)
1915352
1916413
1917555
1918232
191995.0
1920285
1921305
1922262
1923164
1924159
1925192
1926200
1927395
1928171
1929189
1930121
193136.0
1932106
1933145
193488.0
193560.0
193653.0
193775.0
1938253
1939120
194081.0
194199.0
1942193
1943266
1944199
1945188
194690.0
1947255
1948287
1949129
1950278
1951248
1952142
1953251
195479.0
1955160
1956116
1957102
1958165
1959136
1960163
196176.0
1962173
1963176
1964246
1965234
1966104
1967242
1968173
1969195
1970162
1971122
1972127
197342.0
1974151
1975428
1976282
197738.0
1978192
1979126
1980232
1981358
1982243
1983202
1984178
1985104
1986190
1987125
198883.0
1989146
1990167
1991124
199247.0
1993182
1998173
1999120
200018.0
200186.0
2002111
2003133
200482.0
2005185
2006123
2007117
2008178
2009253
2010286
2011420
2012159
2013123
2014276
2015162
2016155
2017139
2018441
2019235
2020225
2021107
2022145
2023311
2024109

About this series

Everything below is a property of the data rather than a rating of it. There is deliberately no single confidence score: how much a gap matters depends on what you are about to do with the series, and only you know that.

Source
United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain
How the values came to existDerived Computed by Hydrionis
Period held1915–2024
Completeness96.4% of the periods in that span are held. Gaps are drawn as breaks and never interpolated.
Known gaps
  • One period inside 1915–2024 holds no value: 1994 to 1997, 4 years with no reading. It is drawn as a break in the line and is never interpolated across.
ContinuityThe record begins in 1915 and is not continuous from it: 110 years separate the first value from the last, and 96% of the years between them are held. The span is not the record.
Inputs last read2026-10-01 · when the records this was computed from were last read from their publishers
Calculation date2026-08-24 · when the calculation method was last versioned, not a reading of any publisher
RedistributionPermitted by the upstream licences
Commercial reusePermitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this.
MethodologyHow this was produced

The snow standing above this water

2 automated snow stations sit inside this drainage area, weighing the snowpack rather than measuring how deep it is.

442
Fullest snowpack recorded at Frohner Meadow, in 1975 (mm of water)
118
Thinnest, in 2026 (mm of water)
April
Month the pack is usually at its fullest
June
Month the pack has gone by, in half of years
Peak snowpack at Frohner Meadow
Water years 1973–2026. Each point is the fullest month of that snow season.
Peak snowpack at Frohner MeadowPeak snowpack at Frohner Meadow: Frohner Meadow in mm, from 1973 to 2026.0200400mm19731980198719942001200820152022Frohner Meadow 1973: 222 mmFrohner Meadow 1974: 271 mmFrohner Meadow 1975: 442 mmFrohner Meadow 1976: 229 mmFrohner Meadow 1977: 131 mmFrohner Meadow 1978: 247 mmFrohner Meadow 1979: 281 mmFrohner Meadow 1980: 244 mmFrohner Meadow 1981: 216 mmFrohner Meadow 1982: 308 mmFrohner Meadow 1983: 222 mmFrohner Meadow 1984: 214 mmFrohner Meadow 1985: 191 mmFrohner Meadow 1986: 194 mmFrohner Meadow 1987: 137 mmFrohner Meadow 1988: 154 mmFrohner Meadow 1989: 204 mmFrohner Meadow 1990: 186 mmFrohner Meadow 1991: 222 mmFrohner Meadow 1992: 154 mmFrohner Meadow 1993: 175 mmFrohner Meadow 1994: 156 mmFrohner Meadow 1995: 148 mmFrohner Meadow 1996: 201 mmFrohner Meadow 1997: 268 mmFrohner Meadow 1998: 167 mmFrohner Meadow 1999: 171 mmFrohner Meadow 2000: 144 mmFrohner Meadow 2001: 206 mmFrohner Meadow 2002: 164 mmFrohner Meadow 2003: 218 mmFrohner Meadow 2004: 167 mmFrohner Meadow 2005: 187 mmFrohner Meadow 2006: 202 mmFrohner Meadow 2007: 161 mmFrohner Meadow 2008: 204 mmFrohner Meadow 2009: 238 mmFrohner Meadow 2010: 152 mmFrohner Meadow 2011: 256 mmFrohner Meadow 2012: 237 mmFrohner Meadow 2013: 159 mmFrohner Meadow 2014: 323 mmFrohner Meadow 2015: 158 mmFrohner Meadow 2016: 165 mmFrohner Meadow 2017: 187 mmFrohner Meadow 2018: 358 mmFrohner Meadow 2019: 230 mmFrohner Meadow 2020: 185 mmFrohner Meadow 2021: 182 mmFrohner Meadow 2022: 162 mmFrohner Meadow 2023: 249 mmFrohner Meadow 2024: 121 mmFrohner Meadow 2025: 161 mmFrohner Meadow 2026: 118 mm

A water year runs October to September and is named for the year it ends, so the snow of one winter stays in one point. The value is the fullest month, not the fullest day: a pack that peaked sharply mid-month reads lower here than a single measurement taken at the right moment would.

View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodFrohner Meadow (mm)
1973222
1974271
1975442
1976229
1977131
1978247
1979281
1980244
1981216
1982308
1983222
1984214
1985191
1986194
1987137
1988154
1989204
1990186
1991222
1992154
1993175
1994156
1995148
1996201
1997268
1998167
1999171
2000144
2001206
2002164
2003218
2004167
2005187
2006202
2007161
2008204
2009238
2010152
2011256
2012237
2013159
2014323
2015158
2016165
2017187
2018358
2019230
2020185
2021182
2022162
2023249
2024121
2025161
2026118

Read against the river

Frohner Meadow and Tenmile Creek near Helena MT both sit in this drainage area, and their records overlap by 51 years. That is the span the two have in common, not a count of years both actually hold — either record may have gaps inside it. The two are shown separately rather than on one axis: millimetres of stored water and cubic metres per second are not commensurable, and a difference between them would mean nothing.

Being in the same drainage area does not put the snowpack upstream of the gauge. A subbasin is an area, and snow on one tributary can join the river below a gauge on another — so a weak relationship here may say more about which tributary was measured than about the snow.

Every gauge Hydrionis holds within this area

Gauges within the Upper Missouri and what each holds
GaugeMeasuresValuesRecord
Tenmile Creek near Rimini MTburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year3561914–2026
Missouri River at Toston MTburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year3071890–2026
Prickly Pear Creek near Clancy MTburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year2821908–2026
Tenmile Creek near Helena MTburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year2111908–2026
Missouri River bl Hauser Dam near Helena MTcatchment area, annual maximum river flow381923–2026
Crow Creek near Radersburg MTcatchment area, annual maximum river flow231901–2026

How these gauges were attached to this water

Assigned by the publisher to a numbered basin Every gauge here is assigned to this drainage area by its own publisher, which issues the area an official code — 10030101. A drainage area is not a river: it contains the tributaries as well as the main channel, and a gauge in it may be on any of them.

What each gauge’s link to this water rests on
GaugeEvidenceEstablished
Tenmile Creek near Rimini MTStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
Missouri River at Toston MTStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
Prickly Pear Creek near Clancy MTStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
Tenmile Creek near Helena MTStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
Missouri River bl Hauser Dam near Helena MTStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
Crow Creek near Radersburg MTStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02

What this record holds

Hydrionis decides which waters get a page, and which of those are offered to search, from what is actually held rather than from how the page reads. Five signals are counted; this record has 5 of them, which makes it a full profile.

Information-gain signals held for this water body
SignalHeldCounts
Gauges holding a real record4yes, 3 or more
Years spanned137yes, 20 or more
Values held2,321yes, 1000 or more
Distinct measurements6yes, 2 or more
Publishers measuring it2yes, 2 or more
Official identifiers1recorded, not counted

Use this data

Use this data

No bulk download is offered here, which is a licence position rather than a product one: at least one contributing publisher does not permit redistribution. The values can be read on the page, cited, and pointed to at source.

Attribution and citation

Suggested citation for Hydrionis

Hydrionis (2026), Upper Missouri gauge records, accessed 2026-10-05, hydrionis.com/waters/united-states-upper-missouri/

Cite Hydrionis where you rely on values Hydrionis computed, on the method that produced them, or on the compilation itself. The underlying measurements remain the publishers’ and their attribution requirements apply to you directly.

Recommended, not required. Hydrionis does not claim rights over unmodified public data it relayed, and doing arithmetic on somebody else’s measurements does not make them Hydrionis’s. Cite the version and the access date: the Upper Missouri gauge records changes as publishers release and as methods are revised, and a citation without both cannot be checked later. Full guidance is on cite and reuse.

None of the contributing licences requires attribution. Crediting the publishers is still good practice and they are listed above.

Where these figures come from

MeasuredHigh confidence2024-05-29

Source: USGS — National Water Information System, USGS site 06062500, annual peak streamflow. Licence: Open.

Method: The instantaneous maximum discharge of each water year as published by USGS, dated to the day it occurred. One value per October-to-September water year; where the publisher lists both a systematic and a historic peak for a year, the larger is the annual maximum. Values the publisher marks as maximum daily averages are not held here, because they are not instantaneous peaks. Values marked as bounded rather than measured are held as censored observations carrying the bound. Cubic feet per second are converted to cubic metres per second and the publisher unit is recorded alongside.

Rating curves are extrapolated at extreme discharges, so the largest values in a peak series carry the largest measurement uncertainty. Data from the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System, a work of the United States government and therefore in the public domain.

Retrieved 1 October 2026.