The monitoring network within this area

Hydrionis holds 459 values from 2 gauges within it. Discharge is a property of a gauge and its reach, not of this drainage area, so this page reports the network and its records rather than a single figure.

2
Gauges
459
Values held
1911–2026
Record spans
Gauges within the Upper Gila-Mangas huc8 subbasin
2 monitoring points, positioned as the publisher records them.
Gauges within the Upper Gila-Mangas huc8 subbasinGILA RIVER NEAR CLIFTON, AZ, GILA RIVER BELOW BLUE CREEK, NEAR VIRDEN, NMGILA RIVER NEAR CLIFTON, AZGILA RIVER BELOW BLUE CREEK, NEAR VIRDEN, NM

Flood peaks, as measured

This gauge's flood record, as measured. Unlike a daily mean it is the discharge at the moment the river was highest, which is the figure flood frequency analysis is built on.

Largest measured flow of each year at GILA RIVER NEAR CLIFTON, AZ
The highest instantaneous discharge the publisher recorded in each year — a flood peak as measured, not a daily average of one. 1911–2025.
Shading marks when something was recorded, not what caused the line.
Largest measured flow of each year at GILA RIVER NEAR CLIFTON, AZLargest measured flow of each year at GILA RIVER NEAR CLIFTON, AZ: GILA RIVER NEAR CLIFTON, AZ in m³/s, from 1911 to 2025.Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapse05001,0001,5002,000m³/s19111934194819601974198820022015

Published by the gauge's own operator from its sub-daily record; Hydrionis stores the figure rather than recomputing it. A year the gauge did not cover produces no value rather than a low one, and the gaps are stated below the chart. A peak is a property of this gauge and its reach: a larger flood upstream or downstream of it is not in this series.

What the shaded periods are (1 event)

A shaded period marks when something was recorded, not what caused the shape of the line. Where the two coincide, they coincided.

Documented recordA documented event, compiled from cited sources after it happened. The dates are as good as the record, which for older events can mean the month rather than the day.

EventTypePeriodStandingAuthority
Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapseFlood2005-08-292005-09-30Documented record
Compiled record

Not shown on this chart

  • The 1976 droughtThis event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • The 2022 droughtThis event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Yorkshire droughtThis event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cantareira water crisis, São PauloThis event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cape Town Day ZeroThis event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • European droughtThis event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodGILA RIVER NEAR CLIFTON, AZ (m³/s)
1911453
1912595
191334.0
1914161
1916215
192881.3
1929374
1930178
1931195
1932127
1933113
1934481
193587.8
1936122
1937211
1938168
1939246
1941799
194292.9
1943192
194473.9
1945129
194830.9
1949394
195047.6
1951130
1952121
1953105
1954170
1955268
1957229
1958113
1959159
1960113
196168.0
1962254
1963101
1964144
196593.7
1967314
1968124
1969102
1970119
1972174
197498.0
1975132
197667.7
197779.9
1978238
1980241
1981232
1983141
19841,382
1985178
198785.5
1988190
198917.6
1991276
19931,005
199419.8
1995702
1996135
1997479
199894.3
199995.4
200022.2
2002114
200483.5
2005869
2006228
2008267
200925.3
2010182
201127.9
201277.0
2013239
2014292
201594.6
201698.0
2018167
202055.8
202156.1
2022521
202415.5
202548.1

About this series

Everything below is a property of the data rather than a rating of it. There is deliberately no single confidence score: how much a gap matters depends on what you are about to do with the series, and only you know that.

Source
United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain
How the values came to existMeasured
Period held19112025
Completeness73.9% of the periods in that span are held. Gaps are drawn as breaks and never interpolated.
Known gaps
  • 19 separate periods inside 1911–2025 hold no value. The longest runs from 1917 to 1927 — 11 years with no reading. They are drawn as breaks in the line and are never interpolated across.
ContinuityThe record begins in 1911 and is not continuous from it: 115 years separate the first value from the last, and 74% of the years between them are held. The span is not the record.
Last read from the publisher2026-08-31
RedistributionPermitted by the upstream licences
Commercial reusePermitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this.
MethodologyHow this was produced

How much of the rain came back out

A discharge in cubic metres per second cannot be compared with anything: the larger number may only mean the larger catchment. Divided by the area draining to the gauge it becomes a depth of water over that land, which answers a question a reader already has — of the rain that fell here, how much came back out as river?

Water leaving the catchment above GILA RIVER NEAR CLIFTON, AZ, as a depth
The year's flow spread over the land draining to this gauge, in millimetres — the same unit rainfall is measured in. 1911–2025.
Shading marks when something was recorded, not what caused the line.
Water leaving the catchment above GILA RIVER NEAR CLIFTON, AZ, as a depthWater leaving the catchment above GILA RIVER NEAR CLIFTON, AZ, as a depth: GILA RIVER NEAR CLIFTON, AZ in mm, from 1911 to 2025.Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapse0204060mm19111937195119631975198720062018

Computed by Hydrionis from the published annual mean flow and the catchment area the station's own publisher states. It is not a water balance: the difference between rainfall and runoff is not evaporation alone but also change in groundwater storage, water abstracted and taken elsewhere, and water imported by transfer schemes — which is why a catchment can yield more runoff than the rain that fell on it without anything being measured wrongly. A different area figure rescales every value here by the ratio between them.

What the shaded periods are (1 event)

A shaded period marks when something was recorded, not what caused the shape of the line. Where the two coincide, they coincided.

Documented recordA documented event, compiled from cited sources after it happened. The dates are as good as the record, which for older events can mean the month rather than the day.

EventTypePeriodStandingAuthority
Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapseFlood2005-08-292005-09-30Documented record
Compiled record

Not shown on this chart

  • The 1976 droughtThis event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • The 2022 droughtThis event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Yorkshire droughtThis event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cantareira water crisis, São PauloThis event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cape Town Day ZeroThis event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • European droughtThis event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodGILA RIVER NEAR CLIFTON, AZ (mm)
191121.0
191223.0
191315.0
191446.0
191557.0
191650.0
191720.0
192914.0
193015.0
193119.0
193219.0
19369.00
193721.0
19389.00
193910.0
194016.0
194148.0
194212.0
19438.00
19449.00
194512.0
19466.00
194932.0
19505.00
19514.00
195212.0
19534.00
19549.00
195510.0
19562.00
195711.0
195822.0
19598.00
196013.0
19616.00
196221.0
196313.0
19646.00
196516.0
196623.0
196713.0
196833.0
19696.00
19705.00
19719.00
197229.0
197335.0
19747.00
197520.0
19768.00
19776.00
197835.0
197935.0
198014.0
19818.00
198213.0
198342.0
198424.0
198541.0
198618.0
198714.0
198826.0
199614.0
199723.0
199822.0
199911.0
200013.0
20018.00
20026.00
20035.00
200413.0
200535.0
200628.0
200714.0
200817.0
20096.00
201025.0
20115.00
20126.00
201318.0
201413.0
201518.0
201615.0
201725.0
20187.00
201914.0
202014.0
20216.00
202231.0
202319.0
20247.00
20253.00

About this series

Everything below is a property of the data rather than a rating of it. There is deliberately no single confidence score: how much a gap matters depends on what you are about to do with the series, and only you know that.

Source
United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain
How the values came to existDerived Computed by Hydrionis
Period held19112025
Completeness80.0% of the periods in that span are held. Gaps are drawn as breaks and never interpolated.
Known gaps
  • 4 separate periods inside 1911–2025 hold no value. The longest runs from 1918 to 1928 — 11 years with no reading. They are drawn as breaks in the line and are never interpolated across.
ContinuityThe record begins in 1911 and is not continuous from it: 115 years separate the first value from the last, and 80% of the years between them are held. The span is not the record.
Last read from the publisher2026-08-24
RedistributionPermitted by the upstream licences
Commercial reusePermitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this.
MethodologyHow this was produced

Every gauge Hydrionis holds within this area

Gauges within the Upper Gila-Mangas and what each holds
GaugeMeasuresValuesRecord
GILA RIVER NEAR CLIFTON, AZburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow2331911–2026
GILA RIVER BELOW BLUE CREEK, NEAR VIRDEN, NMburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow2261927–2026

How these gauges were attached to this water

Assigned by the publisher to a numbered basin Every gauge here is assigned to this drainage area by its own publisher, which issues the area an official code — 15040002. A drainage area is not a river: it contains the tributaries as well as the main channel, and a gauge in it may be on any of them.

What each gauge’s link to this water rests on
GaugeEvidenceEstablished
GILA RIVER NEAR CLIFTON, AZStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-08-26
GILA RIVER BELOW BLUE CREEK, NEAR VIRDEN, NMStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-08-26

What this record holds

Hydrionis decides which waters get a page, and which of those are offered to search, from what is actually held rather than from how the page reads. Five signals are counted; this record has 3 of them, which makes it a full profile.

Information-gain signals held for this water body
SignalHeldCounts
Gauges holding a real record2no
Years spanned116yes, 20 or more
Values held459no
Distinct measurements4yes, 2 or more
Publishers measuring it2yes, 2 or more
Official identifiers1recorded, not counted

Use this data

Use this data

No bulk download is offered here, which is a licence position rather than a product one: at least one contributing publisher does not permit redistribution. The values can be read on the page, cited, and pointed to at source.

Attribution and citation

Suggested citation for Hydrionis

Hydrionis (2026), Upper Gila-Mangas gauge records, accessed 2026-09-02, hydrionis.com/waters/united-states-upper-gila-mangas/

Cite Hydrionis where you rely on values Hydrionis computed, on the method that produced them, or on the compilation itself. The underlying measurements remain the publishers’ and their attribution requirements apply to you directly.

Recommended, not required. Hydrionis does not claim rights over unmodified public data it relayed, and doing arithmetic on somebody else’s measurements does not make them Hydrionis’s. Cite the version and the access date: the Upper Gila-Mangas gauge records changes as publishers release and as methods are revised, and a citation without both cannot be checked later. Full guidance is on cite and reuse.

None of the contributing licences requires attribution. Crediting the publishers is still good practice and they are listed above.

Where these figures come from

MeasuredHigh confidence2025-09-26

Source: USGSNational Water Information System, USGS site 09442000, annual peak streamflow. Licence: Open.

Method: The instantaneous maximum discharge of each water year as published by USGS, dated to the day it occurred. One value per October-to-September water year; where the publisher lists both a systematic and a historic peak for a year, the larger is the annual maximum. Values the publisher marks as maximum daily averages are not held here, because they are not instantaneous peaks. Values marked as bounded rather than measured are held as censored observations carrying the bound. Cubic feet per second are converted to cubic metres per second and the publisher unit is recorded alongside.

Rating curves are extrapolated at extreme discharges, so the largest values in a peak series carry the largest measurement uncertainty. Data from the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System, a work of the United States government and therefore in the public domain.

Retrieved 31 August 2026.