The monitoring network within this area

Hydrionis holds 3,883 values from 7 gauges within it. Discharge is a property of a gauge and its reach, not of this drainage area, so this page reports the network and its records rather than a single figure.

7
Gauges
3,883
Values held
1903–2026
Record spans
Gauges within the Umatilla huc8 subbasin
7 monitoring points, positioned as the publisher records them.
Gauges within the Umatilla huc8 subbasinUMATILLA RIVER AT PENDLETON,OREG, MCKAY CREEK NEAR PILOT ROCK,OREG., MCKAY CREEK NEAR PENDLETON,OREG., UMATILLA RIVER AT YOAKUM,OREG., BUTTER CREEK NEAR PINE CITY, OREG., UMATILLA RIVER NEAR UMATILLA, OR, BIRCH CREEK AT RIETH, ORUMATILLA RIVER AT PENDLETON,OREGMCKAY CREEK NEAR PILOT ROCK,OREG.MCKAY CREEK NEAR PENDLETON,OREG.UMATILLA RIVER AT YOAKUM,OREG.BUTTER CREEK NEAR PINE CITY, OREG.UMATILLA RIVER NEAR UMATILLA, ORBIRCH CREEK AT RIETH, OR

Flood peaks, as measured

This gauge's flood record, as measured. Unlike a daily mean it is the discharge at the moment the river was highest, which is the figure flood frequency analysis is built on.

Largest measured flow of each year at UMATILLA RIVER NEAR UMATILLA, OR
The highest instantaneous discharge the publisher recorded in each year — a flood peak as measured, not a daily average of one. 1904–2025.
Shading marks when something was recorded, not what caused the line.
Largest measured flow of each year at UMATILLA RIVER NEAR UMATILLA, ORLargest measured flow of each year at UMATILLA RIVER NEAR UMATILLA, OR: UMATILLA RIVER NEAR UMATILLA, OR in m³/s, from 1904 to 2025.Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapse0200400600800m³/s19041919193319491966198420002016

Published by the gauge's own operator from its sub-daily record; Hydrionis stores the figure rather than recomputing it. A year the gauge did not cover produces no value rather than a low one, and the gaps are stated below the chart. A peak is a property of this gauge and its reach: a larger flood upstream or downstream of it is not in this series.

What the shaded periods are (1 event)

A shaded period marks when something was recorded, not what caused the shape of the line. Where the two coincide, they coincided.

Documented record — A documented event, compiled from cited sources after it happened. The dates are as good as the record, which for older events can mean the month rather than the day.

EventTypePeriodStandingAuthority
Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapseFlood2005-08-29 – 2005-09-30Documented record
Compiled record

Not shown on this chart

  • The 1976 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • The 2022 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Yorkshire drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cantareira water crisis, São Paulo — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cape Town Day Zero — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • European drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodUMATILLA RIVER NEAR UMATILLA, OR (m³/s)
1904227
190553.5
1906555
1907159
1908413
1909139
1910172
191160.3
1912139
1913263
191488.9
191569.4
1916297
1917289
1919143
1920192
1921235
1922152
192388.6
1924115
1925126
1926139
192798.8
1928148
1929102
193073.3
1931425
1932354
193385.5
193496.0
193577.6
1936123
1937102
193885.5
1939131
1940106
1942102
1943104
1944111
194599.7
1946317
1948172
1949328
1950143
1951136
1952128
1953156
195582.1
1957164
1958261
196078.4
1961114
196294.9
1963159
196488.6
1965561
196642.5
1967164
1969203
1970225
1971143
1972286
1974182
1975413
197757.2
1979204
1980103
1981242
1982282
1983229
1984241
1985142
1986374
198788.9
198897.7
1989178
199059.2
1991377
1993260
1994103
1995238
1996462
1997371
199891.5
200083.0
200151.8
2002167
2003164
2004132
200562.3
2006179
200899.4
2009158
2010132
2011272
2012109
2013181
2014251
2016140
2017214
2018184
2019365
2020765
202180.7
2022193
2023130
2024127
2025182

About this series

Everything below is a property of the data rather than a rating of it. There is deliberately no single confidence score: how much a gap matters depends on what you are about to do with the series, and only you know that.

Source
United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain
How the values came to existMeasured
Period held1904–2025
Completeness88.5% of the periods in that span are held. Gaps are drawn as breaks and never interpolated.
Known gaps
  • 14 separate periods inside 1904–2025 hold no value. They are drawn as breaks in the line and are never interpolated across.
ContinuityThe record begins in 1904 and is not continuous from it: 122 years separate the first value from the last, and 89% of the years between them are held. The span is not the record.
Last read from the publisher2026-10-01
RedistributionPermitted by the upstream licences
Commercial reusePermitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this.
MethodologyHow this was produced

How much of the rain came back out

A discharge in cubic metres per second cannot be compared with anything: the larger number may only mean the larger catchment. Divided by the area draining to the gauge it becomes a depth of water over that land, which answers a question a reader already has — of the rain that fell here, how much came back out as river?

Water leaving the catchment above UMATILLA RIVER NEAR UMATILLA, OR, as a depth
The year's flow spread over the land draining to this gauge, in millimetres — the same unit rainfall is measured in. 1905–2025.
Shading marks when something was recorded, not what caused the line.
Water leaving the catchment above UMATILLA RIVER NEAR UMATILLA, OR, as a depthWater leaving the catchment above UMATILLA RIVER NEAR UMATILLA, OR, as a depth: UMATILLA RIVER NEAR UMATILLA, OR in mm, from 1905 to 2025.Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapse050100150200mm19051921193719531969198520012017

Computed by Hydrionis from the published annual mean flow and the catchment area the station's own publisher states. It is not a water balance: the difference between rainfall and runoff is not evaporation alone but also change in groundwater storage, water abstracted and taken elsewhere, and water imported by transfer schemes — which is why a catchment can yield more runoff than the rain that fell on it without anything being measured wrongly. A different area figure rescales every value here by the ratio between them.

What the shaded periods are (1 event)

A shaded period marks when something was recorded, not what caused the shape of the line. Where the two coincide, they coincided.

Documented record — A documented event, compiled from cited sources after it happened. The dates are as good as the record, which for older events can mean the month rather than the day.

EventTypePeriodStandingAuthority
Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapseFlood2005-08-29 – 2005-09-30Documented record
Compiled record

Not shown on this chart

  • The 1976 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • The 2022 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Yorkshire drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cantareira water crisis, São Paulo — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cape Town Day Zero — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • European drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodUMATILLA RIVER NEAR UMATILLA, OR (mm)
190545.0
1906105
1907117
190856.0
190964.0
191088.0
191139.0
1912131
1913132
191466.0
191539.0
1916141
1917166
191880.0
191974.0
192083.0
1921127
192283.0
192359.0
192452.0
192557.0
192642.0
192795.0
192898.0
192944.0
193031.0
193144.0
193298.0
193375.0
193434.0
193527.0
193648.0
193741.0
193845.0
193941.0
194053.0
194136.0
194281.0
1943101
194435.0
194575.0
194691.0
194766.0
1948127
194986.0
1950101
195185.0
195256.0
195391.0
195436.0
195559.0
195693.0
195775.0
1958110
195971.0
196054.0
196154.0
196249.0
196346.0
196458.0
196585.0
196624.0
196742.0
196832.0
196979.0
197084.0
197164.0
1972113
197346.0
1974122
1975101
197676.0
197727.0
197852.0
197985.0
198068.0
198173.0
1982129
1983108
1984143
198567.0
198681.0
198741.0
198840.0
1989100
199040.0
199184.0
199229.0
1993105
199452.0
1995126
1996133
1997141
199872.0
199980.0
200079.0
200155.0
200259.0
200375.0
200491.0
200535.0
200688.0
200756.0
200880.0
2009101
201066.0
2011171
201285.0
201368.0
201492.0
201551.0
201662.0
2017118
201889.0
2019135
2020112
202172.0
2022105
202380.0
202472.0
202583.0

About this series

Everything below is a property of the data rather than a rating of it. There is deliberately no single confidence score: how much a gap matters depends on what you are about to do with the series, and only you know that.

Source
United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain
How the values came to existDerived Computed by Hydrionis
Period held1905–2025
Completeness100.0% of the periods in that span are held.
ContinuityContinuous: every year from 1905 to 2025 is held.
Inputs last read2026-10-01 · when the records this was computed from were last read from their publishers
Calculation date2026-08-24 · when the calculation method was last versioned, not a reading of any publisher
RedistributionPermitted by the upstream licences
Commercial reusePermitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this.
MethodologyHow this was produced

The snow standing above this water

4 automated snow stations sit inside this drainage area, weighing the snowpack rather than measuring how deep it is.

444
Fullest snowpack recorded at Bowman Springs, in 1989 (mm of water)
34
Thinnest, in 2026 (mm of water)
March
Month the pack is usually at its fullest
May
Month the pack has gone by, in half of years
Peak snowpack at Bowman Springs
Water years 1979–2026. Each point is the fullest month of that snow season.
Peak snowpack at Bowman SpringsPeak snowpack at Bowman Springs: Bowman Springs in mm, from 1979 to 2026.0200400mm19791985199119972003200920152021Bowman Springs 1979: 356 mmBowman Springs 1980: 240 mmBowman Springs 1981: 95.0 mmBowman Springs 1982: 355 mmBowman Springs 1983: 241 mmBowman Springs 1984: 284 mmBowman Springs 1985: 345 mmBowman Springs 1986: 174 mmBowman Springs 1987: 298 mmBowman Springs 1988: 157 mmBowman Springs 1989: 444 mmBowman Springs 1990: 126 mmBowman Springs 1991: 95.0 mmBowman Springs 1992: 88.0 mmBowman Springs 1993: 217 mmBowman Springs 1994: 140 mmBowman Springs 1995: 164 mmBowman Springs 1996: 144 mmBowman Springs 1997: 235 mmBowman Springs 1998: 210 mmBowman Springs 1999: 188 mmBowman Springs 2000: 257 mmBowman Springs 2001: 141 mmBowman Springs 2002: 209 mmBowman Springs 2003: 127 mmBowman Springs 2004: 298 mmBowman Springs 2005: 80.0 mmBowman Springs 2006: 221 mmBowman Springs 2007: 98.0 mmBowman Springs 2008: 234 mmBowman Springs 2009: 242 mmBowman Springs 2010: 119 mmBowman Springs 2011: 236 mmBowman Springs 2012: 131 mmBowman Springs 2013: 146 mmBowman Springs 2014: 164 mmBowman Springs 2015: 69.0 mmBowman Springs 2016: 161 mmBowman Springs 2017: 197 mmBowman Springs 2018: 133 mmBowman Springs 2019: 391 mmBowman Springs 2020: 277 mmBowman Springs 2021: 375 mmBowman Springs 2022: 205 mmBowman Springs 2023: 187 mmBowman Springs 2024: 197 mmBowman Springs 2025: 288 mmBowman Springs 2026: 34.0 mm

A water year runs October to September and is named for the year it ends, so the snow of one winter stays in one point. The value is the fullest month, not the fullest day: a pack that peaked sharply mid-month reads lower here than a single measurement taken at the right moment would.

View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodBowman Springs (mm)
1979356
1980240
198195.0
1982355
1983241
1984284
1985345
1986174
1987298
1988157
1989444
1990126
199195.0
199288.0
1993217
1994140
1995164
1996144
1997235
1998210
1999188
2000257
2001141
2002209
2003127
2004298
200580.0
2006221
200798.0
2008234
2009242
2010119
2011236
2012131
2013146
2014164
201569.0
2016161
2017197
2018133
2019391
2020277
2021375
2022205
2023187
2024197
2025288
202634.0

Why the snow is not read against the river here

Peak snow water equivalent and Mean river flow, water year overlap for only 9 years at these subjects. A relationship read off a span that short is reading the weather of a few seasons.

Every gauge Hydrionis holds within this area

Gauges within the Umatilla and what each holds
GaugeMeasuresValuesRecord
UMATILLA RIVER NEAR UMATILLA, ORburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year4011904–2026
UMATILLA RIVER AT YOAKUM,OREG.burned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year2961903–2026
MCKAY CREEK NEAR PENDLETON,OREG.burned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year2341919–2026
MCKAY CREEK NEAR PILOT ROCK,OREG.burned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year2201926–2026
BUTTER CREEK NEAR PINE CITY, OREG.burned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year2051929–2026
UMATILLA RIVER AT PENDLETON,OREGburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year1991904–2026
BIRCH CREEK AT RIETH, ORcatchment area, annual maximum river flow481928–2026

How these gauges were attached to this water

Assigned by the publisher to a numbered basin Every gauge here is assigned to this drainage area by its own publisher, which issues the area an official code — 17070103. A drainage area is not a river: it contains the tributaries as well as the main channel, and a gauge in it may be on any of them.

What each gauge’s link to this water rests on
GaugeEvidenceEstablished
UMATILLA RIVER NEAR UMATILLA, ORStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
UMATILLA RIVER AT YOAKUM,OREG.Stated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
MCKAY CREEK NEAR PENDLETON,OREG.Stated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
MCKAY CREEK NEAR PILOT ROCK,OREG.Stated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
BUTTER CREEK NEAR PINE CITY, OREG.Stated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
UMATILLA RIVER AT PENDLETON,OREGStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
BIRCH CREEK AT RIETH, ORStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02

What this record holds

Hydrionis decides which waters get a page, and which of those are offered to search, from what is actually held rather than from how the page reads. Five signals are counted; this record has 5 of them, which makes it a full profile.

Information-gain signals held for this water body
SignalHeldCounts
Gauges holding a real record6yes, 3 or more
Years spanned124yes, 20 or more
Values held3,883yes, 1000 or more
Distinct measurements6yes, 2 or more
Publishers measuring it2yes, 2 or more
Official identifiers1recorded, not counted

Use this data

Use this data

No bulk download is offered here, which is a licence position rather than a product one: at least one contributing publisher does not permit redistribution. The values can be read on the page, cited, and pointed to at source.

Attribution and citation

Suggested citation for Hydrionis

Hydrionis (2026), Umatilla gauge records, accessed 2026-10-05, hydrionis.com/waters/united-states-umatilla/

Cite Hydrionis where you rely on values Hydrionis computed, on the method that produced them, or on the compilation itself. The underlying measurements remain the publishers’ and their attribution requirements apply to you directly.

Recommended, not required. Hydrionis does not claim rights over unmodified public data it relayed, and doing arithmetic on somebody else’s measurements does not make them Hydrionis’s. Cite the version and the access date: the Umatilla gauge records changes as publishers release and as methods are revised, and a citation without both cannot be checked later. Full guidance is on cite and reuse.

None of the contributing licences requires attribution. Crediting the publishers is still good practice and they are listed above.

Where these figures come from

MeasuredHigh confidence2025-02-24

Source: USGS — National Water Information System, USGS site 14033500, annual peak streamflow. Licence: Open.

Method: The instantaneous maximum discharge of each water year as published by USGS, dated to the day it occurred. One value per October-to-September water year; where the publisher lists both a systematic and a historic peak for a year, the larger is the annual maximum. Values the publisher marks as maximum daily averages are not held here, because they are not instantaneous peaks. Values marked as bounded rather than measured are held as censored observations carrying the bound. Cubic feet per second are converted to cubic metres per second and the publisher unit is recorded alongside.

Rating curves are extrapolated at extreme discharges, so the largest values in a peak series carry the largest measurement uncertainty. Data from the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System, a work of the United States government and therefore in the public domain.

Retrieved 1 October 2026.