The monitoring network within this area

Hydrionis holds 2,538 values from 2 gauges within it. Discharge is a property of a gauge and its reach, not of this drainage area, so this page reports the network and its records rather than a single figure.

2
Gauges
2,538
Values held
1891–2026
Record spans
Gauges within the San Francisco huc8 subbasin
2 monitoring points, positioned as the publisher records them.
Gauges within the San Francisco huc8 subbasinSAN FRANCISCO RIVER AT CLIFTON, AZ, SAN FRANCISCO RIVER NEAR GLENWOOD, NMSAN FRANCISCO RIVER AT CLIFTON, AZSAN FRANCISCO RIVER NEAR GLENWOOD, NM

Flood peaks, as measured

This gauge's flood record, as measured. Unlike a daily mean it is the discharge at the moment the river was highest, which is the figure flood frequency analysis is built on.

Largest measured flow of each year at SAN FRANCISCO RIVER AT CLIFTON, AZ
The highest instantaneous discharge the publisher recorded in each year — a flood peak as measured, not a daily average of one. 1891–2025.
Shading marks when something was recorded, not what caused the line.
Largest measured flow of each year at SAN FRANCISCO RIVER AT CLIFTON, AZLargest measured flow of each year at SAN FRANCISCO RIVER AT CLIFTON, AZ: SAN FRANCISCO RIVER AT CLIFTON, AZ in m³/s, from 1891 to 2025.Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapse01,0002,0003,000m³/s18911932194519581974198820032018

Published by the gauge's own operator from its sub-daily record; Hydrionis stores the figure rather than recomputing it. A year the gauge did not cover produces no value rather than a low one, and the gaps are stated below the chart. A peak is a property of this gauge and its reach: a larger flood upstream or downstream of it is not in this series.

What the shaded periods are (1 event)

A shaded period marks when something was recorded, not what caused the shape of the line. Where the two coincide, they coincided.

Documented record — A documented event, compiled from cited sources after it happened. The dates are as good as the record, which for older events can mean the month rather than the day.

EventTypePeriodStandingAuthority
Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapseFlood2005-08-29 – 2005-09-30Documented record
Compiled record

Not shown on this chart

  • The 1976 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • The 2022 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Yorkshire drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cantareira water crisis, São Paulo — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cape Town Day Zero — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • European drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodSAN FRANCISCO RIVER AT CLIFTON, AZ (m³/s)
18911,841
19051,699
19061,982
1911425
1912566
1914142
19161,671
1927115
192895.7
1929147
193096.8
193194.3
1932283
1933108
1934331
193569.4
1936105
1937351
1938129
193934.8
1940246
1941225
194344.7
1944108
194579.9
194639.1
1947166
1948166
1949682
195023.4
195120.8
1952447
1953172
1954206
1955239
1957148
1958198
1959328
1960334
1961201
1962405
1964246
1965160
1967983
196936.0
1970153
1971261
19721,812
197427.3
1975850
197687.8
197771.4
1978269
1980280
198144.5
198257.2
1983172
1984776
1985102
198654.9
1988103
199027.0
1991391
1992182
19931,215
199427.5
1995629
199649.6
199857.5
1999209
200013.0
2002208
20039.51
2005617
2006111
200777.0
2008391
2010218
201129.7
201221.3
2013861
2014107
2015185
201675.0
201814.9
2019157
202168.8
202294.3
2023162
202418.6
202522.4

About this series

Everything below is a property of the data rather than a rating of it. There is deliberately no single confidence score: how much a gap matters depends on what you are about to do with the series, and only you know that.

Source
United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain
How the values came to existMeasured
Period held1891–2025
Completeness67.4% of the periods in that span are held. Gaps are drawn as breaks and never interpolated.
Known gaps
  • 20 separate periods inside 1891–2025 hold no value. The longest runs from 1892 to 1904 — 13 years with no reading. They are drawn as breaks in the line and are never interpolated across.
ContinuityThe record begins in 1891 and is not continuous from it: 135 years separate the first value from the last, and 67% of the years between them are held. The span is not the record.
Last read from the publisher2026-10-01
RedistributionPermitted by the upstream licences
Commercial reusePermitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this.
MethodologyHow this was produced

How much of the rain came back out

A discharge in cubic metres per second cannot be compared with anything: the larger number may only mean the larger catchment. Divided by the area draining to the gauge it becomes a depth of water over that land, which answers a question a reader already has — of the rain that fell here, how much came back out as river?

Water leaving the catchment above SAN FRANCISCO RIVER AT CLIFTON, AZ, as a depth
The year's flow spread over the land draining to this gauge, in millimetres — the same unit rainfall is measured in. 1914–2025.
Shading marks when something was recorded, not what caused the line.
Water leaving the catchment above SAN FRANCISCO RIVER AT CLIFTON, AZ, as a depthWater leaving the catchment above SAN FRANCISCO RIVER AT CLIFTON, AZ, as a depth: SAN FRANCISCO RIVER AT CLIFTON, AZ in mm, from 1914 to 2025.Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapse050100mm19141941195419671980199320062019

Computed by Hydrionis from the published annual mean flow and the catchment area the station's own publisher states. It is not a water balance: the difference between rainfall and runoff is not evaporation alone but also change in groundwater storage, water abstracted and taken elsewhere, and water imported by transfer schemes — which is why a catchment can yield more runoff than the rain that fell on it without anything being measured wrongly. A different area figure rescales every value here by the ratio between them.

What the shaded periods are (1 event)

A shaded period marks when something was recorded, not what caused the shape of the line. Where the two coincide, they coincided.

Documented record — A documented event, compiled from cited sources after it happened. The dates are as good as the record, which for older events can mean the month rather than the day.

EventTypePeriodStandingAuthority
Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapseFlood2005-08-29 – 2005-09-30Documented record
Compiled record

Not shown on this chart

  • The 1976 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • The 2022 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Yorkshire drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cantareira water crisis, São Paulo — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cape Town Day Zero — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • European drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodSAN FRANCISCO RIVER AT CLIFTON, AZ (mm)
191445.0
191590.0
191725.0
192814.0
192916.0
193015.0
193125.0
193242.0
193617.0
193731.0
193812.0
193912.0
194023.0
194166.0
194217.0
194310.0
19449.00
194515.0
19469.00
19477.00
194812.0
194944.0
19506.00
19516.00
195232.0
19537.00
195413.0
195513.0
19564.00
195718.0
195845.0
195916.0
196025.0
196117.0
196235.0
196324.0
196412.0
196539.0
196635.0
196727.0
196854.0
196911.0
197010.0
197117.0
197240.0
197358.0
19748.00
197526.0
197611.0
19779.00
197862.0
197958.0
198037.0
198110.0
198218.0
1983105
198433.0
198553.0
198624.0
198730.0
198834.0
198910.0
199013.0
199152.0
199257.0
199399.0
199427.0
199536.0
199614.0
199718.0
199826.0
199918.0
200031.0
200117.0
20029.00
200310.0
200413.0
200549.0
200623.0
200718.0
200829.0
20097.00
201034.0
20118.00
20128.00
201330.0
201415.0
201523.0
201615.0
201726.0
20187.00
201923.0
202024.0
202112.0
202226.0
202330.0
202412.0
20255.00

About this series

Everything below is a property of the data rather than a rating of it. There is deliberately no single confidence score: how much a gap matters depends on what you are about to do with the series, and only you know that.

Source
United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain
How the values came to existDerived Computed by Hydrionis
Period held1914–2025
Completeness87.5% of the periods in that span are held. Gaps are drawn as breaks and never interpolated.
Known gaps
  • 3 separate periods inside 1914–2025 hold no value. The longest runs from 1918 to 1927 — 10 years with no reading. They are drawn as breaks in the line and are never interpolated across.
ContinuityThe record begins in 1914 and is not continuous from it: 112 years separate the first value from the last, and 88% of the years between them are held. The span is not the record.
Inputs last read2026-10-01 · when the records this was computed from were last read from their publishers
Calculation date2026-08-24 · when the calculation method was last versioned, not a reading of any publisher
RedistributionPermitted by the upstream licences
Commercial reusePermitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this.
MethodologyHow this was produced

The snow standing above this water

4 automated snow stations sit inside this drainage area, weighing the snowpack rather than measuring how deep it is.

289
Fullest snowpack recorded at Coronado Trail, in 1993 (mm of water)
1
Thinnest, in 2018 (mm of water)
February
Month the pack is usually at its fullest
April
Month the pack has gone by, in half of years
Peak snowpack at Coronado Trail
Water years 1981–2026. Each point is the fullest month of that snow season.
Peak snowpack at Coronado TrailPeak snowpack at Coronado Trail: Coronado Trail in mm, from 1981 to 2026.0100200300mm19811987199319992005201120172023Coronado Trail 1981: 48.0 mmCoronado Trail 1982: 62.0 mmCoronado Trail 1983: 172 mmCoronado Trail 1984: 40.0 mmCoronado Trail 1985: 227 mmCoronado Trail 1986: 24.0 mmCoronado Trail 1987: 157 mmCoronado Trail 1988: 144 mmCoronado Trail 1989: 95.0 mmCoronado Trail 1990: 35.0 mmCoronado Trail 1991: 131 mmCoronado Trail 1992: 131 mmCoronado Trail 1993: 289 mmCoronado Trail 1994: 62.0 mmCoronado Trail 1995: 72.0 mmCoronado Trail 1996: 39.0 mmCoronado Trail 1997: 80.0 mmCoronado Trail 1998: 167 mmCoronado Trail 1999: 36.0 mmCoronado Trail 2000: 4.00 mmCoronado Trail 2001: 45.0 mmCoronado Trail 2002: 14.0 mmCoronado Trail 2003: 36.0 mmCoronado Trail 2004: 64.0 mmCoronado Trail 2005: 161 mmCoronado Trail 2006: 15.0 mmCoronado Trail 2007: 79.0 mmCoronado Trail 2008: 174 mmCoronado Trail 2009: 89.0 mmCoronado Trail 2010: 281 mmCoronado Trail 2011: 55.0 mmCoronado Trail 2012: 57.0 mmCoronado Trail 2013: 71.0 mmCoronado Trail 2014: 14.0 mmCoronado Trail 2015: 19.0 mmCoronado Trail 2016: 59.0 mmCoronado Trail 2017: 21.0 mmCoronado Trail 2018: 1.00 mmCoronado Trail 2019: 63.0 mmCoronado Trail 2020: 81.0 mmCoronado Trail 2021: 12.0 mmCoronado Trail 2022: 27.0 mmCoronado Trail 2023: 102 mmCoronado Trail 2024: 107 mmCoronado Trail 2025: 2.00 mmCoronado Trail 2026: 11.0 mm

A water year runs October to September and is named for the year it ends, so the snow of one winter stays in one point. The value is the fullest month, not the fullest day: a pack that peaked sharply mid-month reads lower here than a single measurement taken at the right moment would.

View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodCoronado Trail (mm)
198148.0
198262.0
1983172
198440.0
1985227
198624.0
1987157
1988144
198995.0
199035.0
1991131
1992131
1993289
199462.0
199572.0
199639.0
199780.0
1998167
199936.0
20004.00
200145.0
200214.0
200336.0
200464.0
2005161
200615.0
200779.0
2008174
200989.0
2010281
201155.0
201257.0
201371.0
201414.0
201519.0
201659.0
201721.0
20181.00
201963.0
202081.0
202112.0
202227.0
2023102
2024107
20252.00
202611.0

Read against the river

Coronado Trail and SAN FRANCISCO RIVER AT CLIFTON, AZ both sit in this drainage area, and their records overlap by 44 years. That is the span the two have in common, not a count of years both actually hold — either record may have gaps inside it. The two are shown separately rather than on one axis: millimetres of stored water and cubic metres per second are not commensurable, and a difference between them would mean nothing.

Being in the same drainage area does not put the snowpack upstream of the gauge. A subbasin is an area, and snow on one tributary can join the river below a gauge on another — so a weak relationship here may say more about which tributary was measured than about the snow.

Every gauge Hydrionis holds within this area

Gauges within the San Francisco and what each holds
GaugeMeasuresValuesRecord
SAN FRANCISCO RIVER AT CLIFTON, AZburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year3421891–2026
SAN FRANCISCO RIVER NEAR GLENWOOD, NMburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year3271927–2026

How these gauges were attached to this water

Assigned by the publisher to a numbered basin Every gauge here is assigned to this drainage area by its own publisher, which issues the area an official code — 15040004. A drainage area is not a river: it contains the tributaries as well as the main channel, and a gauge in it may be on any of them.

What each gauge’s link to this water rests on
GaugeEvidenceEstablished
SAN FRANCISCO RIVER AT CLIFTON, AZStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
SAN FRANCISCO RIVER NEAR GLENWOOD, NMStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02

What this record holds

Hydrionis decides which waters get a page, and which of those are offered to search, from what is actually held rather than from how the page reads. Five signals are counted; this record has 4 of them, which makes it a full profile.

Information-gain signals held for this water body
SignalHeldCounts
Gauges holding a real record2no
Years spanned136yes, 20 or more
Values held2,538yes, 1000 or more
Distinct measurements6yes, 2 or more
Publishers measuring it2yes, 2 or more
Official identifiers1recorded, not counted

Use this data

Use this data

No bulk download is offered here, which is a licence position rather than a product one: at least one contributing publisher does not permit redistribution. The values can be read on the page, cited, and pointed to at source.

Attribution and citation

Suggested citation for Hydrionis

Hydrionis (2026), San Francisco gauge records, accessed 2026-10-05, hydrionis.com/waters/united-states-san-francisco/

Cite Hydrionis where you rely on values Hydrionis computed, on the method that produced them, or on the compilation itself. The underlying measurements remain the publishers’ and their attribution requirements apply to you directly.

Recommended, not required. Hydrionis does not claim rights over unmodified public data it relayed, and doing arithmetic on somebody else’s measurements does not make them Hydrionis’s. Cite the version and the access date: the San Francisco gauge records changes as publishers release and as methods are revised, and a citation without both cannot be checked later. Full guidance is on cite and reuse.

None of the contributing licences requires attribution. Crediting the publishers is still good practice and they are listed above.

Where these figures come from

MeasuredHigh confidence2025-07-31

Source: USGS — National Water Information System, USGS site 09444500, annual peak streamflow. Licence: Open.

Method: The instantaneous maximum discharge of each water year as published by USGS, dated to the day it occurred. One value per October-to-September water year; where the publisher lists both a systematic and a historic peak for a year, the larger is the annual maximum. Values the publisher marks as maximum daily averages are not held here, because they are not instantaneous peaks. Values marked as bounded rather than measured are held as censored observations carrying the bound. Cubic feet per second are converted to cubic metres per second and the publisher unit is recorded alongside.

Rating curves are extrapolated at extreme discharges, so the largest values in a peak series carry the largest measurement uncertainty. Data from the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System, a work of the United States government and therefore in the public domain.

Retrieved 1 October 2026.