The monitoring network within this area

Hydrionis holds 306 values from 2 gauges within it. Discharge is a property of a gauge and its reach, not of this drainage area, so this page reports the network and its records rather than a single figure.

2
Gauges
306
Values held
1895–2026
Record spans
Gauges within the Sac huc8 subbasin
2 monitoring points, positioned as the publisher records them.
Gauges within the Sac huc8 subbasinCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO, Sac River near Stockton, MOCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MOSac River near Stockton, MO

Flood peaks, as measured

This gauge's flood record, as measured. Unlike a daily mean it is the discharge at the moment the river was highest, which is the figure flood frequency analysis is built on.

Largest measured flow of each year at Cedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO
The highest instantaneous discharge the publisher recorded in each year — a flood peak as measured, not a daily average of one. 1909–2025.
Shading marks when something was recorded, not what caused the line.
Largest measured flow of each year at Cedar Creek near Pleasant View, MOLargest measured flow of each year at Cedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO: Cedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO in m³/s, from 1909 to 2025.Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapse05001,000m³/s19091955196519781990200120122023

Published by the gauge's own operator from its sub-daily record; Hydrionis stores the figure rather than recomputing it. A year the gauge did not cover produces no value rather than a low one, and the gaps are stated below the chart. A peak is a property of this gauge and its reach: a larger flood upstream or downstream of it is not in this series.

What the shaded periods are (1 event)

A shaded period marks when something was recorded, not what caused the shape of the line. Where the two coincide, they coincided.

Documented record — A documented event, compiled from cited sources after it happened. The dates are as good as the record, which for older events can mean the month rather than the day.

EventTypePeriodStandingAuthority
Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapseFlood2005-08-29 – 2005-09-30Documented record
Compiled record

Not shown on this chart

  • The 1976 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • The 2022 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Yorkshire drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cantareira water crisis, São Paulo — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cape Town Day Zero — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • European drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO (m³/s)
19090
1923207
1924453
1925239
1943552
1949185
1950280
1951688
195362.0
195444.5
1955195
1956172
1957280
19581,048
1959168
1960207
1961784
1962300
1963207
1964179
1965314
196690.6
1967161
1968204
1970538
1971190
1973317
1974527
1976150
1977123
1978242
1979232
1981569
1982118
1983317
1984326
1985742
19861,028
1987294
1989572
1990309
199194.6
1992260
1993643
19941,028
1995399
1996106
1997419
1998175
200080.4
2001255
2002340
200354.9
2004256
2005311
200613.5
2007476
2008433
2009464
2011233
2012264
2013487
201459.7
2015189
2017595
2018144
2019665
2020244
2021270
2022470
202337.9
2024592
2025297

About this series

Everything below is a property of the data rather than a rating of it. There is deliberately no single confidence score: how much a gap matters depends on what you are about to do with the series, and only you know that.

Source
United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain
How the values came to existMeasured
Period held1909–2025
Completeness62.4% of the periods in that span are held. Gaps are drawn as breaks and never interpolated.
Known gaps
  • 12 separate periods inside 1909–2025 hold no value. The longest runs from 1926 to 1942 — 17 years with no reading. They are drawn as breaks in the line and are never interpolated across.
ContinuityThe record begins in 1909 and is not continuous from it: 117 years separate the first value from the last, and 62% of the years between them are held. The span is not the record.
Last read from the publisher2026-10-01
RedistributionPermitted by the upstream licences
Commercial reusePermitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this.
MethodologyHow this was produced

How much of the rain came back out

A discharge in cubic metres per second cannot be compared with anything: the larger number may only mean the larger catchment. Divided by the area draining to the gauge it becomes a depth of water over that land, which answers a question a reader already has — of the rain that fell here, how much came back out as river?

Water leaving the catchment above Cedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO, as a depth
The year's flow spread over the land draining to this gauge, in millimetres — the same unit rainfall is measured in. 1924–2025.
Shading marks when something was recorded, not what caused the line.
Water leaving the catchment above Cedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO, as a depthWater leaving the catchment above Cedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO, as a depth: Cedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO in mm, from 1924 to 2025.Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapse0200400600800mm19241957196719771987199720072017Cedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1924: 362 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1925: 264 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1949: 333 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1950: 268 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1951: 666 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1952: 134 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1953: 42.0 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1954: 74.0 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1955: 183 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1956: 25.0 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1957: 309 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1958: 327 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1959: 172 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1960: 156 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1961: 395 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1962: 191 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1963: 67.0 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1964: 100 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1965: 285 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1966: 121 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1967: 242 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1968: 343 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1969: 270 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1970: 280 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1971: 210 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1972: 187 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1973: 609 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1974: 425 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1975: 311 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1976: 172 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1977: 102 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1978: 159 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1979: 331 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1980: 110 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1981: 220 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1982: 273 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1983: 369 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1984: 377 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1985: 645 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1986: 435 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1987: 355 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1988: 234 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1989: 241 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1990: 369 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1991: 59.0 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1992: 412 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1993: 497 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1994: 375 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1995: 423 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1996: 214 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1997: 246 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1998: 395 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 1999: 398 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 2000: 76.0 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 2001: 199 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 2002: 223 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 2003: 128 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 2004: 372 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 2005: 159 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 2006: 6.00 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 2007: 321 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 2008: 537 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 2009: 406 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 2010: 317 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 2011: 255 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 2012: 176 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 2013: 481 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 2014: 43.0 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 2015: 455 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 2016: 171 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 2017: 331 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 2018: 103 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 2019: 627 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 2020: 410 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 2021: 361 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 2022: 213 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 2023: 38.0 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 2024: 282 mmCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO 2025: 328 mm

Computed by Hydrionis from the published annual mean flow and the catchment area the station's own publisher states. It is not a water balance: the difference between rainfall and runoff is not evaporation alone but also change in groundwater storage, water abstracted and taken elsewhere, and water imported by transfer schemes — which is why a catchment can yield more runoff than the rain that fell on it without anything being measured wrongly. A different area figure rescales every value here by the ratio between them.

What the shaded periods are (1 event)

A shaded period marks when something was recorded, not what caused the shape of the line. Where the two coincide, they coincided.

Documented record — A documented event, compiled from cited sources after it happened. The dates are as good as the record, which for older events can mean the month rather than the day.

EventTypePeriodStandingAuthority
Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapseFlood2005-08-29 – 2005-09-30Documented record
Compiled record

Not shown on this chart

  • The 1976 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • The 2022 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Yorkshire drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cantareira water crisis, São Paulo — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cape Town Day Zero — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • European drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodCedar Creek near Pleasant View, MO (mm)
1924362
1925264
1949333
1950268
1951666
1952134
195342.0
195474.0
1955183
195625.0
1957309
1958327
1959172
1960156
1961395
1962191
196367.0
1964100
1965285
1966121
1967242
1968343
1969270
1970280
1971210
1972187
1973609
1974425
1975311
1976172
1977102
1978159
1979331
1980110
1981220
1982273
1983369
1984377
1985645
1986435
1987355
1988234
1989241
1990369
199159.0
1992412
1993497
1994375
1995423
1996214
1997246
1998395
1999398
200076.0
2001199
2002223
2003128
2004372
2005159
20066.00
2007321
2008537
2009406
2010317
2011255
2012176
2013481
201443.0
2015455
2016171
2017331
2018103
2019627
2020410
2021361
2022213
202338.0
2024282
2025328

About this series

Everything below is a property of the data rather than a rating of it. There is deliberately no single confidence score: how much a gap matters depends on what you are about to do with the series, and only you know that.

Source
United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain
How the values came to existDerived Computed by Hydrionis
Period held1924–2025
Completeness77.5% of the periods in that span are held. Gaps are drawn as breaks and never interpolated.
Known gaps
  • One period inside 1924–2025 holds no value: 1926 to 1948, 23 years with no reading. It is drawn as a break in the line and is never interpolated across.
ContinuityThe record begins in 1924 and is not continuous from it: 102 years separate the first value from the last, and 77% of the years between them are held. The span is not the record.
Inputs last read2026-10-01 · when the records this was computed from were last read from their publishers
Calculation date2026-08-24 · when the calculation method was last versioned, not a reading of any publisher
RedistributionPermitted by the upstream licences
Commercial reusePermitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this.
MethodologyHow this was produced

Every gauge Hydrionis holds within this area

Gauges within the Sac and what each holds
GaugeMeasuresValuesRecord
Cedar Creek near Pleasant View, MOcatchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year2421909–2026
Sac River near Stockton, MOcatchment area, annual maximum river flow641895–2026

How these gauges were attached to this water

Assigned by the publisher to a numbered basin Every gauge here is assigned to this drainage area by its own publisher, which issues the area an official code — 10290106. A drainage area is not a river: it contains the tributaries as well as the main channel, and a gauge in it may be on any of them.

What each gauge’s link to this water rests on
GaugeEvidenceEstablished
Cedar Creek near Pleasant View, MOStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
Sac River near Stockton, MOStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02

What this record holds

Hydrionis decides which waters get a page, and which of those are offered to search, from what is actually held rather than from how the page reads. Five signals are counted; this record has 2 of them, which makes it a profile, not indexed.

Information-gain signals held for this water body
SignalHeldCounts
Gauges holding a real record2no
Years spanned132yes, 20 or more
Values held306no
Distinct measurements4yes, 2 or more
Publishers measuring it1no
Official identifiers1recorded, not counted

Use this data

Use this data

No bulk download is offered here, which is a licence position rather than a product one: at least one contributing publisher does not permit redistribution. The values can be read on the page, cited, and pointed to at source.

Attribution and citation

Suggested citation for Hydrionis

Hydrionis (2026), Sac gauge records, accessed 2026-10-05, hydrionis.com/waters/united-states-sac/

Cite Hydrionis where you rely on values Hydrionis computed, on the method that produced them, or on the compilation itself. The underlying measurements remain the publishers’ and their attribution requirements apply to you directly.

Recommended, not required. Hydrionis does not claim rights over unmodified public data it relayed, and doing arithmetic on somebody else’s measurements does not make them Hydrionis’s. Cite the version and the access date: the Sac gauge records changes as publishers release and as methods are revised, and a citation without both cannot be checked later. Full guidance is on cite and reuse.

None of the contributing licences requires attribution. Crediting the publishers is still good practice and they are listed above.

Where these figures come from

MeasuredHigh confidence2025-04-21

Source: USGS — National Water Information System, USGS site 06919500, annual peak streamflow. Licence: Open.

Method: The instantaneous maximum discharge of each water year as published by USGS, dated to the day it occurred. One value per October-to-September water year; where the publisher lists both a systematic and a historic peak for a year, the larger is the annual maximum. Values the publisher marks as maximum daily averages are not held here, because they are not instantaneous peaks. Values marked as bounded rather than measured are held as censored observations carrying the bound. Cubic feet per second are converted to cubic metres per second and the publisher unit is recorded alongside.

Rating curves are extrapolated at extreme discharges, so the largest values in a peak series carry the largest measurement uncertainty. Data from the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System, a work of the United States government and therefore in the public domain.

Retrieved 1 October 2026.