The monitoring network within this area

Hydrionis holds 1,090 values from 2 gauges within it. Discharge is a property of a gauge and its reach, not of this drainage area, so this page reports the network and its records rather than a single figure.

2
Gauges
1,090
Values held
1906–2026
Record spans
Gauges within the Nisqually huc8 subbasin
2 monitoring points, positioned as the publisher records them.
Gauges within the Nisqually huc8 subbasinNISQUALLY RIVER AT LA GRANDE, WA, OHOP CREEK NEAR EATONVILLE, WANISQUALLY RIVER AT LA GRANDE, WAOHOP CREEK NEAR EATONVILLE, WA

Flood peaks, as measured

This gauge's flood record, as measured. Unlike a daily mean it is the discharge at the moment the river was highest, which is the figure flood frequency analysis is built on.

Largest measured flow of each year at NISQUALLY RIVER AT LA GRANDE, WA
The highest instantaneous discharge the publisher recorded in each year — a flood peak as measured, not a daily average of one. 1919–2025.
Shading marks when something was recorded, not what caused the line.
Largest measured flow of each year at NISQUALLY RIVER AT LA GRANDE, WALargest measured flow of each year at NISQUALLY RIVER AT LA GRANDE, WA: NISQUALLY RIVER AT LA GRANDE, WA in m³/s, from 1919 to 2025.Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapse05001,000m³/s19191931195519671979199220052014

Published by the gauge's own operator from its sub-daily record; Hydrionis stores the figure rather than recomputing it. A year the gauge did not cover produces no value rather than a low one, and the gaps are stated below the chart. A peak is a property of this gauge and its reach: a larger flood upstream or downstream of it is not in this series.

What the shaded periods are (1 event)

A shaded period marks when something was recorded, not what caused the shape of the line. Where the two coincide, they coincided.

Documented record — A documented event, compiled from cited sources after it happened. The dates are as good as the record, which for older events can mean the month rather than the day.

EventTypePeriodStandingAuthority
Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapseFlood2005-08-29 – 2005-09-30Documented record
Compiled record

Not shown on this chart

  • The 1976 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • The 2022 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Yorkshire drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cantareira water crisis, São Paulo — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cape Town Day Zero — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • European drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodNISQUALLY RIVER AT LA GRANDE, WA (m³/s)
1919326
1920354
1921552
1923476
1924371
1925266
1927261
1928130
1929172
1931303
1945340
1946328
1948237
1949188
1950425
1951436
1953300
1954191
1955479
1957174
1958195
1959377
1961374
196282.1
1964250
1965453
196675.0
1967348
1968253
1970241
1971176
1972394
1974513
1975261
197667.4
1977278
197982.7
1980609
1982476
1983289
1985204
1986213
1988159
1990419
1991493
1992113
199362.9
1994317
19961,119
1997129
1998323
1999219
200134.3
2003309
200569.1
2006379
2007216
2008147
2009253
201072.8
2011309
2012112
201375.0
2014314
2015362
2017225
2018236
2020447
2021216
202266.5
2023118
202570.8

About this series

Everything below is a property of the data rather than a rating of it. There is deliberately no single confidence score: how much a gap matters depends on what you are about to do with the series, and only you know that.

Source
United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain
How the values came to existMeasured
Period held1919–2025
Completeness67.3% of the periods in that span are held. Gaps are drawn as breaks and never interpolated.
Known gaps
  • 23 separate periods inside 1919–2025 hold no value. The longest runs from 1932 to 1944 — 13 years with no reading. They are drawn as breaks in the line and are never interpolated across.
ContinuityThe record begins in 1919 and is not continuous from it: 107 years separate the first value from the last, and 67% of the years between them are held. The span is not the record.
Last read from the publisher2026-10-01
RedistributionPermitted by the upstream licences
Commercial reusePermitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this.
MethodologyHow this was produced

How much of the rain came back out

A discharge in cubic metres per second cannot be compared with anything: the larger number may only mean the larger catchment. Divided by the area draining to the gauge it becomes a depth of water over that land, which answers a question a reader already has — of the rain that fell here, how much came back out as river?

Water leaving the catchment above NISQUALLY RIVER AT LA GRANDE, WA, as a depth
The year's flow spread over the land draining to this gauge, in millimetres — the same unit rainfall is measured in. 1907–2024.
Shading marks when something was recorded, not what caused the line.
Water leaving the catchment above NISQUALLY RIVER AT LA GRANDE, WA, as a depthWater leaving the catchment above NISQUALLY RIVER AT LA GRANDE, WA, as a depth: NISQUALLY RIVER AT LA GRANDE, WA in mm, from 1907 to 2024.Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapse5001,0001,5002,0002,500mm19071928195319651977198920012013

Computed by Hydrionis from the published annual mean flow and the catchment area the station's own publisher states. It is not a water balance: the difference between rainfall and runoff is not evaporation alone but also change in groundwater storage, water abstracted and taken elsewhere, and water imported by transfer schemes — which is why a catchment can yield more runoff than the rain that fell on it without anything being measured wrongly. A different area figure rescales every value here by the ratio between them.

What the shaded periods are (1 event)

A shaded period marks when something was recorded, not what caused the shape of the line. Where the two coincide, they coincided.

Documented record — A documented event, compiled from cited sources after it happened. The dates are as good as the record, which for older events can mean the month rather than the day.

EventTypePeriodStandingAuthority
Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapseFlood2005-08-29 – 2005-09-30Documented record
Compiled record

Not shown on this chart

  • The 1976 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • The 2022 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Yorkshire drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cantareira water crisis, São Paulo — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cape Town Day Zero — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • European drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodNISQUALLY RIVER AT LA GRANDE, WA (mm)
19071,546
19081,639
19091,514
19101,869
19201,651
19212,103
19221,153
19231,504
19241,430
19251,482
19261,237
19271,875
19281,366
19291,124
19301,020
1944863
19451,395
19462,006
19471,526
19481,790
19491,809
19502,293
19511,777
19521,260
19531,804
19541,913
19552,327
19562,016
19571,572
19581,859
19592,158
19601,783
19611,933
19621,500
19631,425
19641,910
19651,611
19661,540
19671,729
19681,873
19691,613
19701,645
19712,131
19722,283
19731,496
19742,262
19752,205
19761,769
19771,749
19781,314
19791,498
19801,794
19811,693
19822,044
19831,959
19841,804
19851,354
19861,478
19871,345
19881,575
19891,471
19902,047
19911,758
19921,191
19931,280
19941,471
19952,037
19962,144
19972,362
19981,758
19992,271
20001,415
20011,248
20021,652
20031,599
20041,557
20051,308
20062,160
20071,713
20081,725
20091,678
20101,794
20112,052
20122,090
20131,730
20142,009
20151,693
20161,938
20172,091
20181,619
20191,183
20201,980
20211,687
20221,742
20231,343
20241,353

About this series

Everything below is a property of the data rather than a rating of it. There is deliberately no single confidence score: how much a gap matters depends on what you are about to do with the series, and only you know that.

Source
United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain
How the values came to existDerived Computed by Hydrionis
Period held1907–2024
Completeness81.4% of the periods in that span are held. Gaps are drawn as breaks and never interpolated.
Known gaps
  • 2 separate periods inside 1907–2024 hold no value. The longest runs from 1931 to 1943 — 13 years with no reading. They are drawn as breaks in the line and are never interpolated across.
ContinuityThe record begins in 1907 and is not continuous from it: 118 years separate the first value from the last, and 81% of the years between them are held. The span is not the record.
Inputs last read2026-10-01 · when the records this was computed from were last read from their publishers
Calculation date2026-08-24 · when the calculation method was last versioned, not a reading of any publisher
RedistributionPermitted by the upstream licences
Commercial reusePermitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this.
MethodologyHow this was produced

The snow standing above this water

1 automated snow station sits inside this drainage area, weighing the snowpack rather than measuring how deep it is.

2,886
Fullest snowpack recorded at Paradise, in 1997 (mm of water)
647
Thinnest, in 2015 (mm of water)
April
Month the pack is usually at its fullest
July
Month the pack has gone by, in half of years
Peak snowpack at Paradise
Water years 1981–2026. Each point is the fullest month of that snow season.
Peak snowpack at ParadisePeak snowpack at Paradise: Paradise in mm, from 1981 to 2026.01,0002,0003,000mm19811989199520012007201320192025Paradise 1981: 1,007 mmParadise 1984: 1,751 mmParadise 1985: 1,812 mmParadise 1986: 1,531 mmParadise 1987: 1,536 mmParadise 1988: 1,683 mmParadise 1989: 2,067 mmParadise 1990: 1,866 mmParadise 1991: 2,077 mmParadise 1992: 1,386 mmParadise 1993: 1,581 mmParadise 1994: 1,563 mmParadise 1995: 1,981 mmParadise 1996: 1,661 mmParadise 1997: 2,886 mmParadise 1998: 1,764 mmParadise 1999: 2,834 mmParadise 2000: 2,123 mmParadise 2001: 1,271 mmParadise 2002: 2,371 mmParadise 2003: 1,508 mmParadise 2004: 1,834 mmParadise 2005: 925 mmParadise 2006: 2,077 mmParadise 2007: 1,831 mmParadise 2008: 2,585 mmParadise 2009: 2,136 mmParadise 2010: 1,704 mmParadise 2011: 2,480 mmParadise 2012: 2,086 mmParadise 2013: 2,166 mmParadise 2014: 2,315 mmParadise 2015: 647 mmParadise 2016: 1,926 mmParadise 2017: 2,200 mmParadise 2018: 1,963 mmParadise 2019: 1,615 mmParadise 2020: 2,257 mmParadise 2021: 2,344 mmParadise 2022: 2,037 mmParadise 2023: 1,753 mmParadise 2024: 1,479 mmParadise 2025: 1,765 mmParadise 2026: 962 mm

A water year runs October to September and is named for the year it ends, so the snow of one winter stays in one point. The value is the fullest month, not the fullest day: a pack that peaked sharply mid-month reads lower here than a single measurement taken at the right moment would.

View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodParadise (mm)
19811,007
19841,751
19851,812
19861,531
19871,536
19881,683
19892,067
19901,866
19912,077
19921,386
19931,581
19941,563
19951,981
19961,661
19972,886
19981,764
19992,834
20002,123
20011,271
20022,371
20031,508
20041,834
2005925
20062,077
20071,831
20082,585
20092,136
20101,704
20112,480
20122,086
20132,166
20142,315
2015647
20161,926
20172,200
20181,963
20191,615
20202,257
20212,344
20222,037
20231,753
20241,479
20251,765
2026962

Read against the river

Paradise and NISQUALLY RIVER AT LA GRANDE, WA both sit in this drainage area, and their records overlap by 44 years. That is the span the two have in common, not a count of years both actually hold — either record may have gaps inside it. The two are shown separately rather than on one axis: millimetres of stored water and cubic metres per second are not commensurable, and a difference between them would mean nothing.

Being in the same drainage area does not put the snowpack upstream of the gauge. A subbasin is an area, and snow on one tributary can join the river below a gauge on another — so a weak relationship here may say more about which tributary was measured than about the snow.

Every gauge Hydrionis holds within this area

Gauges within the Nisqually and what each holds
GaugeMeasuresValuesRecord
NISQUALLY RIVER AT LA GRANDE, WAburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year3241906–2026
OHOP CREEK NEAR EATONVILLE, WAburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year2381927–2026

How these gauges were attached to this water

Assigned by the publisher to a numbered basin Every gauge here is assigned to this drainage area by its own publisher, which issues the area an official code — 17110015. A drainage area is not a river: it contains the tributaries as well as the main channel, and a gauge in it may be on any of them.

What each gauge’s link to this water rests on
GaugeEvidenceEstablished
NISQUALLY RIVER AT LA GRANDE, WAStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
OHOP CREEK NEAR EATONVILLE, WAStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02

What this record holds

Hydrionis decides which waters get a page, and which of those are offered to search, from what is actually held rather than from how the page reads. Five signals are counted; this record has 4 of them, which makes it a full profile.

Information-gain signals held for this water body
SignalHeldCounts
Gauges holding a real record2no
Years spanned121yes, 20 or more
Values held1,090yes, 1000 or more
Distinct measurements6yes, 2 or more
Publishers measuring it2yes, 2 or more
Official identifiers1recorded, not counted

Use this data

Use this data

No bulk download is offered here, which is a licence position rather than a product one: at least one contributing publisher does not permit redistribution. The values can be read on the page, cited, and pointed to at source.

Attribution and citation

Suggested citation for Hydrionis

Hydrionis (2026), Nisqually gauge records, accessed 2026-10-05, hydrionis.com/waters/united-states-nisqually/

Cite Hydrionis where you rely on values Hydrionis computed, on the method that produced them, or on the compilation itself. The underlying measurements remain the publishers’ and their attribution requirements apply to you directly.

Recommended, not required. Hydrionis does not claim rights over unmodified public data it relayed, and doing arithmetic on somebody else’s measurements does not make them Hydrionis’s. Cite the version and the access date: the Nisqually gauge records changes as publishers release and as methods are revised, and a citation without both cannot be checked later. Full guidance is on cite and reuse.

None of the contributing licences requires attribution. Crediting the publishers is still good practice and they are listed above.

Where these figures come from

MeasuredHigh confidence2025-03-27

Source: USGS — National Water Information System, USGS site 12086500, annual peak streamflow. Licence: Open.

Method: The instantaneous maximum discharge of each water year as published by USGS, dated to the day it occurred. One value per October-to-September water year; where the publisher lists both a systematic and a historic peak for a year, the larger is the annual maximum. Values the publisher marks as maximum daily averages are not held here, because they are not instantaneous peaks. Values marked as bounded rather than measured are held as censored observations carrying the bound. Cubic feet per second are converted to cubic metres per second and the publisher unit is recorded alongside.

Rating curves are extrapolated at extreme discharges, so the largest values in a peak series carry the largest measurement uncertainty. Data from the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System, a work of the United States government and therefore in the public domain.

Retrieved 1 October 2026.