The monitoring network within this area

Hydrionis holds 1,027 values from 3 gauges within it. Discharge is a property of a gauge and its reach, not of this drainage area, so this page reports the network and its records rather than a single figure.

3
Gauges
1,027
Values held
1903–2026
Record spans
Gauges within the Meramec huc8 subbasin
3 monitoring points, positioned as the publisher records them.
Gauges within the Meramec huc8 subbasinMeramec River near Eureka, MO, Meramec River near Steelville, MO, Meramec River near Sullivan, MOMeramec River near Eureka, MOMeramec River near Steelville, MOMeramec River near Sullivan, MO

Flood peaks, as measured

This gauge's flood record, as measured. Unlike a daily mean it is the discharge at the moment the river was highest, which is the figure flood frequency analysis is built on.

Largest measured flow of each year at Meramec River near Steelville, MO
The highest instantaneous discharge the publisher recorded in each year — a flood peak as measured, not a daily average of one. 1915–2024.
Shading marks when something was recorded, not what caused the line.
Largest measured flow of each year at Meramec River near Steelville, MOLargest measured flow of each year at Meramec River near Steelville, MO: Meramec River near Steelville, MO in m³/s, from 1915 to 2024.Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapse05001,0001,5002,000m³/s19151930194419561970198420012014

Published by the gauge's own operator from its sub-daily record; Hydrionis stores the figure rather than recomputing it. A year the gauge did not cover produces no value rather than a low one, and the gaps are stated below the chart. A peak is a property of this gauge and its reach: a larger flood upstream or downstream of it is not in this series.

What the shaded periods are (1 event)

A shaded period marks when something was recorded, not what caused the shape of the line. Where the two coincide, they coincided.

Documented record — A documented event, compiled from cited sources after it happened. The dates are as good as the record, which for older events can mean the month rather than the day.

EventTypePeriodStandingAuthority
Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapseFlood2005-08-29 – 2005-09-30Documented record
Compiled record

Not shown on this chart

  • The 1976 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • The 2022 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Yorkshire drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cantareira water crisis, São Paulo — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cape Town Day Zero — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • European drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodMeramec River near Steelville, MO (m³/s)
19151,699
1917147
1918946
1919277
1921736
1922821
1923334
1924337
1925206
19271,019
1928858
1929498
1930510
193154.7
193269.7
1933674
1934428
19351,354
1937422
1938416
1939711
1940252
1941640
1942447
1944204
19451,331
1946575
1947852
1948303
1949547
1950705
1951852
1952261
1953146
1954176
1955306
1956188
1957606
1958501
195992.0
1961459
1962413
1963317
1964391
1965311
1966929
1967294
19691,070
1970198
1971113
1972314
1973382
1975530
197627.6
1977422
1978354
1979782
198048.1
1981210
1982425
1984266
19851,450
1986382
1987260
1988132
1990439
1992354
1993631
1995564
1996600
19981,580
1999504
2001256
2002833
2003292
2004240
2005456
2006388
2007182
20081,492
2009612
2011532
2012122
2013459
2014108
2015430
20171,761
2018620
2019306
2020479
2021309
2022411
2023547
2024275

About this series

Everything below is a property of the data rather than a rating of it. There is deliberately no single confidence score: how much a gap matters depends on what you are about to do with the series, and only you know that.

Source
United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain
How the values came to existMeasured
Period held1915–2024
Completeness85.5% of the periods in that span are held. Gaps are drawn as breaks and never interpolated.
Known gaps
  • 16 separate periods inside 1915–2024 hold no value. They are drawn as breaks in the line and are never interpolated across.
ContinuityThe record begins in 1915 and is not continuous from it: 110 years separate the first value from the last, and 85% of the years between them are held. The span is not the record.
Last read from the publisher2026-10-01
RedistributionPermitted by the upstream licences
Commercial reusePermitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this.
MethodologyHow this was produced

How much of the rain came back out

A discharge in cubic metres per second cannot be compared with anything: the larger number may only mean the larger catchment. Divided by the area draining to the gauge it becomes a depth of water over that land, which answers a question a reader already has — of the rain that fell here, how much came back out as river?

Water leaving the catchment above Meramec River near Eureka, MO, as a depth
The year's flow spread over the land draining to this gauge, in millimetres — the same unit rainfall is measured in. 1904–2025.
Shading marks when something was recorded, not what caused the line.
Water leaving the catchment above Meramec River near Eureka, MO, as a depthWater leaving the catchment above Meramec River near Eureka, MO, as a depth: Meramec River near Eureka, MO in mm, from 1904 to 2025.Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapse0200400600800mm19041934194819621976199020042018

Computed by Hydrionis from the published annual mean flow and the catchment area the station's own publisher states. It is not a water balance: the difference between rainfall and runoff is not evaporation alone but also change in groundwater storage, water abstracted and taken elsewhere, and water imported by transfer schemes — which is why a catchment can yield more runoff than the rain that fell on it without anything being measured wrongly. A different area figure rescales every value here by the ratio between them.

What the shaded periods are (1 event)

A shaded period marks when something was recorded, not what caused the shape of the line. Where the two coincide, they coincided.

Documented record — A documented event, compiled from cited sources after it happened. The dates are as good as the record, which for older events can mean the month rather than the day.

EventTypePeriodStandingAuthority
Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapseFlood2005-08-29 – 2005-09-30Documented record
Compiled record

Not shown on this chart

  • The 1976 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • The 2022 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Yorkshire drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cantareira water crisis, São Paulo — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cape Town Day Zero — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • European drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodMeramec River near Eureka, MO (mm)
1904329
1905348
1922273
1923280
1924286
1925213
1926238
1927582
1928337
1929335
1930203
1931117
1932122
1933248
1934189
1935454
1936105
1937276
1938354
1939298
1940147
1941209
1942391
1943299
1944211
1945539
1946297
1947278
1948258
1949439
1950500
1951491
1952230
1953126
195477.0
1955135
1956106
1957573
1958280
1959200
1960176
1961316
1962238
1963140
1964154
1965126
1966249
1967268
1968312
1969329
1970301
1971172
1972272
1973481
1974360
1975397
197697.0
1977235
1978238
1979369
1980105
1981299
1982519
1983427
1984442
1985705
1986272
1987247
1988262
1989210
1990372
1991271
1992230
1993690
1994425
1995399
1996361
1997352
1998399
1999260
2000117
2001166
2002353
2003283
2004345
2005279
2006196
2007212
2008551
2009500
2010306
2011384
2012157
2013419
2014152
2015499
2016354
2017392
2018294
2019441
2020466
2021311
2022359
2023294
2024347
2025358

About this series

Everything below is a property of the data rather than a rating of it. There is deliberately no single confidence score: how much a gap matters depends on what you are about to do with the series, and only you know that.

Source
United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain
How the values came to existDerived Computed by Hydrionis
Period held1904–2025
Completeness86.9% of the periods in that span are held. Gaps are drawn as breaks and never interpolated.
Known gaps
  • One period inside 1904–2025 holds no value: 1906 to 1921, 16 years with no reading. It is drawn as a break in the line and is never interpolated across.
ContinuityThe record begins in 1904 and is not continuous from it: 122 years separate the first value from the last, and 87% of the years between them are held. The span is not the record.
Inputs last read2026-10-01 · when the records this was computed from were last read from their publishers
Calculation date2026-08-24 · when the calculation method was last versioned, not a reading of any publisher
RedistributionPermitted by the upstream licences
Commercial reusePermitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this.
MethodologyHow this was produced

Every gauge Hydrionis holds within this area

Gauges within the Meramec and what each holds
GaugeMeasuresValuesRecord
Meramec River near Eureka, MOburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year3571903–2026
Meramec River near Steelville, MOburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year3531915–2026
Meramec River near Sullivan, MOburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year3171921–2026

How these gauges were attached to this water

Assigned by the publisher to a numbered basin Every gauge here is assigned to this drainage area by its own publisher, which issues the area an official code — 07140102. A drainage area is not a river: it contains the tributaries as well as the main channel, and a gauge in it may be on any of them.

What each gauge’s link to this water rests on
GaugeEvidenceEstablished
Meramec River near Eureka, MOStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
Meramec River near Steelville, MOStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
Meramec River near Sullivan, MOStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02

What this record holds

Hydrionis decides which waters get a page, and which of those are offered to search, from what is actually held rather than from how the page reads. Five signals are counted; this record has 5 of them, which makes it a full profile.

Information-gain signals held for this water body
SignalHeldCounts
Gauges holding a real record3yes, 3 or more
Years spanned124yes, 20 or more
Values held1,027yes, 1000 or more
Distinct measurements5yes, 2 or more
Publishers measuring it2yes, 2 or more
Official identifiers1recorded, not counted

Use this data

Use this data

No bulk download is offered here, which is a licence position rather than a product one: at least one contributing publisher does not permit redistribution. The values can be read on the page, cited, and pointed to at source.

Attribution and citation

Suggested citation for Hydrionis

Hydrionis (2026), Meramec gauge records, accessed 2026-10-05, hydrionis.com/waters/united-states-meramec/

Cite Hydrionis where you rely on values Hydrionis computed, on the method that produced them, or on the compilation itself. The underlying measurements remain the publishers’ and their attribution requirements apply to you directly.

Recommended, not required. Hydrionis does not claim rights over unmodified public data it relayed, and doing arithmetic on somebody else’s measurements does not make them Hydrionis’s. Cite the version and the access date: the Meramec gauge records changes as publishers release and as methods are revised, and a citation without both cannot be checked later. Full guidance is on cite and reuse.

None of the contributing licences requires attribution. Crediting the publishers is still good practice and they are listed above.

Where these figures come from

MeasuredHigh confidence2024-11-08

Source: USGS — National Water Information System, USGS site 07019000, annual peak streamflow. Licence: Open.

Method: The instantaneous maximum discharge of each water year as published by USGS, dated to the day it occurred. One value per October-to-September water year; where the publisher lists both a systematic and a historic peak for a year, the larger is the annual maximum. Values the publisher marks as maximum daily averages are not held here, because they are not instantaneous peaks. Values marked as bounded rather than measured are held as censored observations carrying the bound. Cubic feet per second are converted to cubic metres per second and the publisher unit is recorded alongside.

Rating curves are extrapolated at extreme discharges, so the largest values in a peak series carry the largest measurement uncertainty. Data from the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System, a work of the United States government and therefore in the public domain.

Retrieved 1 October 2026.