The monitoring network within this area

Hydrionis holds 1,598 values from 4 gauges within it. Discharge is a property of a gauge and its reach, not of this drainage area, so this page reports the network and its records rather than a single figure.

4
Gauges
1,598
Values held
1897–2026
Record spans
Gauges within the Lower Deschutes huc8 subbasin
4 monitoring points, positioned as the publisher records them.
Gauges within the Lower Deschutes huc8 subbasinDESCHUTES RIVER NEAR MADRAS, OR, WHITE RIVER BELOW TYGH VALLEY, OR, DESCHUTES RIVER AT MOODY, NEAR BIGGS, OR, SHITIKE CREEK NEAR WARM SPRINGS, ORDESCHUTES RIVER NEAR MADRAS, ORWHITE RIVER BELOW TYGH VALLEY, ORDESCHUTES RIVER AT MOODY, NEAR BIGGS, ORSHITIKE CREEK NEAR WARM SPRINGS, OR

Flood peaks, as measured

This gauge's flood record, as measured. Unlike a daily mean it is the discharge at the moment the river was highest, which is the figure flood frequency analysis is built on.

Largest measured flow of each year at DESCHUTES RIVER AT MOODY, NEAR BIGGS, OR
The highest instantaneous discharge the publisher recorded in each year — a flood peak as measured, not a daily average of one. 1897–2025.
Shading marks when something was recorded, not what caused the line.
Largest measured flow of each year at DESCHUTES RIVER AT MOODY, NEAR BIGGS, ORLargest measured flow of each year at DESCHUTES RIVER AT MOODY, NEAR BIGGS, OR: DESCHUTES RIVER AT MOODY, NEAR BIGGS, OR in m³/s, from 1897 to 2025.Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapse05001,0001,5002,000m³/s18971920193419491966198019962010

Published by the gauge's own operator from its sub-daily record; Hydrionis stores the figure rather than recomputing it. A year the gauge did not cover produces no value rather than a low one, and the gaps are stated below the chart. A peak is a property of this gauge and its reach: a larger flood upstream or downstream of it is not in this series.

What the shaded periods are (1 event)

A shaded period marks when something was recorded, not what caused the shape of the line. Where the two coincide, they coincided.

Documented record — A documented event, compiled from cited sources after it happened. The dates are as good as the record, which for older events can mean the month rather than the day.

EventTypePeriodStandingAuthority
Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapseFlood2005-08-29 – 2005-09-30Documented record
Compiled record

Not shown on this chart

  • The 1976 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • The 2022 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Yorkshire drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cantareira water crisis, São Paulo — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cape Town Day Zero — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • European drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodDESCHUTES RIVER AT MOODY, NEAR BIGGS, OR (m³/s)
1897331
1899453
1907866
1909416
1910762
1911306
1912507
1913388
1914334
1915279
1916765
1917411
1919382
1920479
1921413
19231,235
1924245
1925544
1926377
1927917
1928326
1929210
1930242
1931445
1932351
1933283
1934266
1936317
1937377
1938430
1939276
1940326
1941181
1942379
1943932
1944212
1945248
1946459
1948538
1949538
1950430
1951552
1952425
1953558
1954442
1955237
1957405
1958507
1960282
19611,150
1963527
19641,906
1966405
1967259
1968297
1969283
1970464
1971496
1972555
1973294
1974731
1975447
1976379
1977222
1979578
1980498
1982776
1983609
1984467
1987223
1988510
1989264
1990211
1991195
1992193
1993439
1994165
1995487
19961,991
19971,141
1998547
1999411
2000178
2002268
2003328
2004348
2005188
2006937
2007382
2008289
2009385
2010289
2011541
2012413
2014479
2016266
2017388
2019711
2020199
2021283
2022238
2023300
2024345
2025442

About this series

Everything below is a property of the data rather than a rating of it. There is deliberately no single confidence score: how much a gap matters depends on what you are about to do with the series, and only you know that.

Source
United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain
How the values came to existMeasured
Period held1897–2025
Completeness80.6% of the periods in that span are held. Gaps are drawn as breaks and never interpolated.
Known gaps
  • 18 separate periods inside 1897–2025 hold no value. The longest runs from 1900 to 1906 — 7 years with no reading. They are drawn as breaks in the line and are never interpolated across.
ContinuityThe record begins in 1897 and is not continuous from it: 129 years separate the first value from the last, and 81% of the years between them are held. The span is not the record.
Last read from the publisher2026-10-01
RedistributionPermitted by the upstream licences
Commercial reusePermitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this.
MethodologyHow this was produced

How much of the rain came back out

A discharge in cubic metres per second cannot be compared with anything: the larger number may only mean the larger catchment. Divided by the area draining to the gauge it becomes a depth of water over that land, which answers a question a reader already has — of the rain that fell here, how much came back out as river?

Water leaving the catchment above DESCHUTES RIVER AT MOODY, NEAR BIGGS, OR, as a depth
The year's flow spread over the land draining to this gauge, in millimetres — the same unit rainfall is measured in. 1898–2024.
Shading marks when something was recorded, not what caused the line.
Water leaving the catchment above DESCHUTES RIVER AT MOODY, NEAR BIGGS, OR, as a depthWater leaving the catchment above DESCHUTES RIVER AT MOODY, NEAR BIGGS, OR, as a depth: DESCHUTES RIVER AT MOODY, NEAR BIGGS, OR in mm, from 1898 to 2024.Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapse100150200250300mm18981920193519501965198019952010

Computed by Hydrionis from the published annual mean flow and the catchment area the station's own publisher states. It is not a water balance: the difference between rainfall and runoff is not evaporation alone but also change in groundwater storage, water abstracted and taken elsewhere, and water imported by transfer schemes — which is why a catchment can yield more runoff than the rain that fell on it without anything being measured wrongly. A different area figure rescales every value here by the ratio between them.

What the shaded periods are (1 event)

A shaded period marks when something was recorded, not what caused the shape of the line. Where the two coincide, they coincided.

Documented record — A documented event, compiled from cited sources after it happened. The dates are as good as the record, which for older events can mean the month rather than the day.

EventTypePeriodStandingAuthority
Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapseFlood2005-08-29 – 2005-09-30Documented record
Compiled record

Not shown on this chart

  • The 1976 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • The 2022 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Yorkshire drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cantareira water crisis, São Paulo — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cape Town Day Zero — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • European drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodDESCHUTES RIVER AT MOODY, NEAR BIGGS, OR (mm)
1898206
1899275
1907262
1908214
1909230
1910244
1911193
1912236
1913216
1914196
1915163
1916237
1917209
1918181
1919185
1920171
1921233
1922199
1923199
1924161
1925192
1926158
1927204
1928185
1929155
1930143
1931136
1932165
1933168
1934154
1935158
1936169
1937169
1938201
1939149
1940154
1941144
1942169
1943227
1944145
1945159
1946196
1947166
1948193
1949199
1950219
1951235
1952204
1953223
1954212
1955194
1956243
1957202
1958219
1959176
1960176
1961187
1962190
1963178
1964158
1965206
1966169
1967166
1968160
1969182
1970185
1971200
1972234
1973174
1974229
1975216
1976205
1977163
1978188
1979180
1980188
1981184
1982221
1983246
1984246
1985187
1986215
1987172
1988169
1989180
1990159
1991153
1992149
1993183
1994142
1995188
1996241
1997250
1998210
1999227
2000204
2001155
2002167
2003162
2004178
2005161
2006221
2007184
2008187
2009189
2010191
2011213
2012213
2013176
2014197
2015171
2016181
2017210
2018165
2019179
2020155
2021154
2022160
2023161
2024176

About this series

Everything below is a property of the data rather than a rating of it. There is deliberately no single confidence score: how much a gap matters depends on what you are about to do with the series, and only you know that.

Source
United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain
How the values came to existDerived Computed by Hydrionis
Period held1898–2024
Completeness94.5% of the periods in that span are held. Gaps are drawn as breaks and never interpolated.
Known gaps
  • One period inside 1898–2024 holds no value: 1900 to 1906, 7 years with no reading. It is drawn as a break in the line and is never interpolated across.
ContinuityThe record begins in 1898 and is not continuous from it: 127 years separate the first value from the last, and 94% of the years between them are held. The span is not the record.
Inputs last read2026-10-01 · when the records this was computed from were last read from their publishers
Calculation date2026-08-24 · when the calculation method was last versioned, not a reading of any publisher
RedistributionPermitted by the upstream licences
Commercial reusePermitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this.
MethodologyHow this was produced

The snow standing above this water

1 automated snow station sits inside this drainage area, weighing the snowpack rather than measuring how deep it is.

655
Fullest snowpack recorded at Clear Lake, in 2008 (mm of water)
31
Thinnest, in 2015 (mm of water)
March
Month the pack is usually at its fullest
May
Month the pack has gone by, in half of years
Peak snowpack at Clear Lake
Water years 1981–2026. Each point is the fullest month of that snow season.
Peak snowpack at Clear LakePeak snowpack at Clear Lake: Clear Lake in mm, from 1981 to 2026.0200400600800mm19811987199319992005201120172023Clear Lake 1981: 35.0 mmClear Lake 1982: 440 mmClear Lake 1983: 361 mmClear Lake 1984: 270 mmClear Lake 1985: 488 mmClear Lake 1986: 308 mmClear Lake 1987: 205 mmClear Lake 1988: 298 mmClear Lake 1989: 445 mmClear Lake 1990: 416 mmClear Lake 1991: 159 mmClear Lake 1992: 43.0 mmClear Lake 1993: 323 mmClear Lake 1994: 208 mmClear Lake 1995: 269 mmClear Lake 1996: 315 mmClear Lake 1997: 600 mmClear Lake 1998: 424 mmClear Lake 1999: 609 mmClear Lake 2000: 480 mmClear Lake 2001: 192 mmClear Lake 2002: 606 mmClear Lake 2003: 156 mmClear Lake 2004: 320 mmClear Lake 2005: 55.0 mmClear Lake 2006: 440 mmClear Lake 2007: 248 mmClear Lake 2008: 655 mmClear Lake 2009: 400 mmClear Lake 2010: 80.0 mmClear Lake 2011: 303 mmClear Lake 2012: 334 mmClear Lake 2013: 238 mmClear Lake 2014: 167 mmClear Lake 2015: 31.0 mmClear Lake 2016: 220 mmClear Lake 2017: 394 mmClear Lake 2018: 134 mmClear Lake 2019: 291 mmClear Lake 2020: 144 mmClear Lake 2021: 295 mmClear Lake 2022: 281 mmClear Lake 2023: 323 mmClear Lake 2024: 238 mmClear Lake 2025: 180 mmClear Lake 2026: 37.0 mm

A water year runs October to September and is named for the year it ends, so the snow of one winter stays in one point. The value is the fullest month, not the fullest day: a pack that peaked sharply mid-month reads lower here than a single measurement taken at the right moment would.

View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodClear Lake (mm)
198135.0
1982440
1983361
1984270
1985488
1986308
1987205
1988298
1989445
1990416
1991159
199243.0
1993323
1994208
1995269
1996315
1997600
1998424
1999609
2000480
2001192
2002606
2003156
2004320
200555.0
2006440
2007248
2008655
2009400
201080.0
2011303
2012334
2013238
2014167
201531.0
2016220
2017394
2018134
2019291
2020144
2021295
2022281
2023323
2024238
2025180
202637.0

Read against the river

Clear Lake and DESCHUTES RIVER NEAR MADRAS, OR both sit in this drainage area, and their records overlap by 44 years. That is the span the two have in common, not a count of years both actually hold — either record may have gaps inside it. The two are shown separately rather than on one axis: millimetres of stored water and cubic metres per second are not commensurable, and a difference between them would mean nothing.

Being in the same drainage area does not put the snowpack upstream of the gauge. A subbasin is an area, and snow on one tributary can join the river below a gauge on another — so a weak relationship here may say more about which tributary was measured than about the snow.

Every gauge Hydrionis holds within this area

Gauges within the Lower Deschutes and what each holds
GaugeMeasuresValuesRecord
DESCHUTES RIVER AT MOODY, NEAR BIGGS, ORburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year3981897–2026
DESCHUTES RIVER NEAR MADRAS, ORburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year3401924–2026
WHITE RIVER BELOW TYGH VALLEY, ORburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year2681917–2026
SHITIKE CREEK NEAR WARM SPRINGS, ORcatchment area, annual maximum river flow401912–2026

How these gauges were attached to this water

Assigned by the publisher to a numbered basin Every gauge here is assigned to this drainage area by its own publisher, which issues the area an official code — 17070306. A drainage area is not a river: it contains the tributaries as well as the main channel, and a gauge in it may be on any of them.

What each gauge’s link to this water rests on
GaugeEvidenceEstablished
DESCHUTES RIVER AT MOODY, NEAR BIGGS, ORStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
DESCHUTES RIVER NEAR MADRAS, ORStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
WHITE RIVER BELOW TYGH VALLEY, ORStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
SHITIKE CREEK NEAR WARM SPRINGS, ORStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02

What this record holds

Hydrionis decides which waters get a page, and which of those are offered to search, from what is actually held rather than from how the page reads. Five signals are counted; this record has 5 of them, which makes it a full profile.

Information-gain signals held for this water body
SignalHeldCounts
Gauges holding a real record3yes, 3 or more
Years spanned130yes, 20 or more
Values held1,598yes, 1000 or more
Distinct measurements6yes, 2 or more
Publishers measuring it2yes, 2 or more
Official identifiers1recorded, not counted

Use this data

Use this data

No bulk download is offered here, which is a licence position rather than a product one: at least one contributing publisher does not permit redistribution. The values can be read on the page, cited, and pointed to at source.

Attribution and citation

Suggested citation for Hydrionis

Hydrionis (2026), Lower Deschutes gauge records, accessed 2026-10-05, hydrionis.com/waters/united-states-lower-deschutes/

Cite Hydrionis where you rely on values Hydrionis computed, on the method that produced them, or on the compilation itself. The underlying measurements remain the publishers’ and their attribution requirements apply to you directly.

Recommended, not required. Hydrionis does not claim rights over unmodified public data it relayed, and doing arithmetic on somebody else’s measurements does not make them Hydrionis’s. Cite the version and the access date: the Lower Deschutes gauge records changes as publishers release and as methods are revised, and a citation without both cannot be checked later. Full guidance is on cite and reuse.

None of the contributing licences requires attribution. Crediting the publishers is still good practice and they are listed above.

Where these figures come from

MeasuredHigh confidence2025-02-25

Source: USGS — National Water Information System, USGS site 14103000, annual peak streamflow. Licence: Open.

Method: The instantaneous maximum discharge of each water year as published by USGS, dated to the day it occurred. One value per October-to-September water year; where the publisher lists both a systematic and a historic peak for a year, the larger is the annual maximum. Values the publisher marks as maximum daily averages are not held here, because they are not instantaneous peaks. Values marked as bounded rather than measured are held as censored observations carrying the bound. Cubic feet per second are converted to cubic metres per second and the publisher unit is recorded alongside.

Rating curves are extrapolated at extreme discharges, so the largest values in a peak series carry the largest measurement uncertainty. Data from the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System, a work of the United States government and therefore in the public domain.

Retrieved 1 October 2026.