The monitoring network within this area

Hydrionis holds 3,855 values from 5 gauges within it. Discharge is a property of a gauge and its reach, not of this drainage area, so this page reports the network and its records rather than a single figure.

5
Gauges
3,855
Values held
1922–2026
Record spans
Gauges within the Lewis huc8 subbasin
5 monitoring points, positioned as the publisher records them.
Gauges within the Lewis huc8 subbasinMUDDY RIVER BELOW CLEAR CREEK NEAR COUGAR, WA, LEWIS RIVER AT ARIEL, WA, EAST FORK LEWIS RIVER NEAR HEISSON, WA, LEWIS RIVER ABOVE MUDDY RIVER NEAR COUGAR, WA, CANYON CREEK NEAR AMBOY, WAMUDDY RIVER BELOW CLEAR CREEK NEAR COUGAR, WALEWIS RIVER AT ARIEL, WAEAST FORK LEWIS RIVER NEAR HEISSON, WALEWIS RIVER ABOVE MUDDY RIVER NEAR COUGAR, WACANYON CREEK NEAR AMBOY, WA

Flood peaks, as measured

This gauge's flood record, as measured. Unlike a daily mean it is the discharge at the moment the river was highest, which is the figure flood frequency analysis is built on.

Largest measured flow of each year at LEWIS RIVER AT ARIEL, WA
The highest instantaneous discharge the publisher recorded in each year — a flood peak as measured, not a daily average of one. 1924–2025.
Shading marks when something was recorded, not what caused the line.
Largest measured flow of each year at LEWIS RIVER AT ARIEL, WALargest measured flow of each year at LEWIS RIVER AT ARIEL, WA: LEWIS RIVER AT ARIEL, WA in m³/s, from 1924 to 2025.Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapse01,0002,0003,0004,000m³/s19241937195019641978199320052018

Published by the gauge's own operator from its sub-daily record; Hydrionis stores the figure rather than recomputing it. A year the gauge did not cover produces no value rather than a low one, and the gaps are stated below the chart. A peak is a property of this gauge and its reach: a larger flood upstream or downstream of it is not in this series.

What the shaded periods are (1 event)

A shaded period marks when something was recorded, not what caused the shape of the line. Where the two coincide, they coincided.

Documented record — A documented event, compiled from cited sources after it happened. The dates are as good as the record, which for older events can mean the month rather than the day.

EventTypePeriodStandingAuthority
Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapseFlood2005-08-29 – 2005-09-30Documented record
Compiled record

Not shown on this chart

  • The 1976 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • The 2022 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Yorkshire drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cantareira water crisis, São Paulo — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cape Town Day Zero — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • European drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodLEWIS RIVER AT ARIEL, WA (m³/s)
1924844
1926750
19271,773
1928464
1930609
1931866
19321,181
1933983
19341,076
1936966
19371,390
1939697
19401,045
19411,150
19421,631
1944530
19451,212
19461,906
1948872
1949742
19501,138
1951705
19531,354
1955572
1957767
1958518
1959929
19601,365
1961337
19622,138
1964501
1966337
1968881
19701,184
1971660
19721,031
19741,688
1975634
1976334
19772,036
1978334
1980340
19821,152
1983765
1985626
1986784
1987348
1989331
19901,189
1992357
1993340
1994334
1995753
19962,447
1997966
19981,017
19991,011
2001274
20031,396
2004331
2005467
2006847
2007515
20091,141
2010360
20111,002
2012648
2014748
2015898
2017745
2018340
2020592
2021637
2022481
2024614
2025345

About this series

Everything below is a property of the data rather than a rating of it. There is deliberately no single confidence score: how much a gap matters depends on what you are about to do with the series, and only you know that.

Source
United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain
How the values came to existMeasured
Period held1924–2025
Completeness74.5% of the periods in that span are held. Gaps are drawn as breaks and never interpolated.
Known gaps
  • 26 separate periods inside 1924–2025 hold no value. They are drawn as breaks in the line and are never interpolated across.
ContinuityThe record begins in 1924 and is not continuous from it: 102 years separate the first value from the last, and 75% of the years between them are held. The span is not the record.
Last read from the publisher2026-10-01
RedistributionPermitted by the upstream licences
Commercial reusePermitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this.
MethodologyHow this was produced

How much of the rain came back out

A discharge in cubic metres per second cannot be compared with anything: the larger number may only mean the larger catchment. Divided by the area draining to the gauge it becomes a depth of water over that land, which answers a question a reader already has — of the rain that fell here, how much came back out as river?

Water leaving the catchment above LEWIS RIVER AT ARIEL, WA, as a depth
The year's flow spread over the land draining to this gauge, in millimetres — the same unit rainfall is measured in. 1924–2025.
Shading marks when something was recorded, not what caused the line.
Water leaving the catchment above LEWIS RIVER AT ARIEL, WA, as a depthWater leaving the catchment above LEWIS RIVER AT ARIEL, WA, as a depth: LEWIS RIVER AT ARIEL, WA in mm, from 1924 to 2025.Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapse1,0002,0003,0004,000mm19241937195019631976198920022015

Computed by Hydrionis from the published annual mean flow and the catchment area the station's own publisher states. It is not a water balance: the difference between rainfall and runoff is not evaporation alone but also change in groundwater storage, water abstracted and taken elsewhere, and water imported by transfer schemes — which is why a catchment can yield more runoff than the rain that fell on it without anything being measured wrongly. A different area figure rescales every value here by the ratio between them.

What the shaded periods are (1 event)

A shaded period marks when something was recorded, not what caused the shape of the line. Where the two coincide, they coincided.

Documented record — A documented event, compiled from cited sources after it happened. The dates are as good as the record, which for older events can mean the month rather than the day.

EventTypePeriodStandingAuthority
Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapseFlood2005-08-29 – 2005-09-30Documented record
Compiled record

Not shown on this chart

  • The 1976 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • The 2022 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Yorkshire drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cantareira water crisis, São Paulo — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cape Town Day Zero — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • European drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodLEWIS RIVER AT ARIEL, WA (mm)
19241,840
19252,178
19261,874
19272,531
19282,148
19291,475
19301,441
19311,622
19322,796
19333,618
19342,549
19351,838
19361,868
19372,539
19382,032
19391,804
19401,885
19411,681
19421,827
19432,007
19441,324
19452,233
19462,845
19472,192
19482,256
19492,281
19503,407
19512,538
19521,488
19532,895
19542,510
19552,808
19562,836
19571,996
19582,165
19592,511
19602,514
19612,756
19622,242
19632,084
19642,605
19651,961
19662,247
19672,339
19682,716
19692,294
19702,287
19712,910
19723,109
19732,124
19743,155
19752,840
19762,048
19772,079
19781,841
19791,790
19802,115
19812,124
19822,611
19832,801
19842,383
19851,708
19861,921
19871,806
19881,914
19891,898
19902,497
19912,124
19921,435
19931,701
19942,012
19952,793
19963,005
19973,007
19982,515
19992,961
20001,908
20011,550
20022,010
20032,228
20041,941
20051,704
20062,589
20071,996
20082,033
20091,965
20102,320
20112,474
20122,805
20131,905
20142,562
20152,010
20162,440
20172,881
20182,066
20191,506
20202,233
20212,200
20222,192
20232,155
20242,146
20252,084

About this series

Everything below is a property of the data rather than a rating of it. There is deliberately no single confidence score: how much a gap matters depends on what you are about to do with the series, and only you know that.

Source
United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain
How the values came to existDerived Computed by Hydrionis
Period held1924–2025
Completeness100.0% of the periods in that span are held.
ContinuityContinuous: every year from 1924 to 2025 is held.
Inputs last read2026-10-01 · when the records this was computed from were last read from their publishers
Calculation date2026-08-24 · when the calculation method was last versioned, not a reading of any publisher
RedistributionPermitted by the upstream licences
Commercial reusePermitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this.
MethodologyHow this was produced

The snow standing above this water

7 automated snow stations sit inside this drainage area, weighing the snowpack rather than measuring how deep it is.

2,150
Fullest snowpack recorded at Surprise Lakes, in 1999 (mm of water)
241
Thinnest, in 2005 (mm of water)
April
Month the pack is usually at its fullest
June
Month the pack has gone by, in half of years
Peak snowpack at Surprise Lakes
Water years 1980–2026. Each point is the fullest month of that snow season.
Peak snowpack at Surprise LakesPeak snowpack at Surprise Lakes: Surprise Lakes in mm, from 1980 to 2026.01,0002,000mm19801986199219982004201020162022Surprise Lakes 1980: 1,018 mmSurprise Lakes 1981: 327 mmSurprise Lakes 1982: 1,653 mmSurprise Lakes 1983: 1,430 mmSurprise Lakes 1984: 1,482 mmSurprise Lakes 1985: 1,292 mmSurprise Lakes 1986: 917 mmSurprise Lakes 1987: 950 mmSurprise Lakes 1988: 565 mmSurprise Lakes 1989: 1,449 mmSurprise Lakes 1990: 1,095 mmSurprise Lakes 1991: 885 mmSurprise Lakes 1992: 661 mmSurprise Lakes 1993: 1,011 mmSurprise Lakes 1994: 1,030 mmSurprise Lakes 1995: 1,199 mmSurprise Lakes 1996: 797 mmSurprise Lakes 1997: 1,903 mmSurprise Lakes 1998: 1,367 mmSurprise Lakes 1999: 2,150 mmSurprise Lakes 2000: 1,523 mmSurprise Lakes 2001: 796 mmSurprise Lakes 2002: 1,453 mmSurprise Lakes 2003: 1,016 mmSurprise Lakes 2004: 1,220 mmSurprise Lakes 2005: 241 mmSurprise Lakes 2006: 1,830 mmSurprise Lakes 2007: 1,206 mmSurprise Lakes 2008: 1,771 mmSurprise Lakes 2009: 1,174 mmSurprise Lakes 2010: 1,188 mmSurprise Lakes 2011: 1,653 mmSurprise Lakes 2012: 1,512 mmSurprise Lakes 2013: 1,167 mmSurprise Lakes 2014: 953 mmSurprise Lakes 2015: 255 mmSurprise Lakes 2016: 1,337 mmSurprise Lakes 2017: 1,614 mmSurprise Lakes 2018: 1,238 mmSurprise Lakes 2019: 861 mmSurprise Lakes 2020: 940 mmSurprise Lakes 2021: 1,285 mmSurprise Lakes 2022: 1,061 mmSurprise Lakes 2023: 1,403 mmSurprise Lakes 2024: 930 mmSurprise Lakes 2025: 1,188 mmSurprise Lakes 2026: 558 mm

A water year runs October to September and is named for the year it ends, so the snow of one winter stays in one point. The value is the fullest month, not the fullest day: a pack that peaked sharply mid-month reads lower here than a single measurement taken at the right moment would.

View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodSurprise Lakes (mm)
19801,018
1981327
19821,653
19831,430
19841,482
19851,292
1986917
1987950
1988565
19891,449
19901,095
1991885
1992661
19931,011
19941,030
19951,199
1996797
19971,903
19981,367
19992,150
20001,523
2001796
20021,453
20031,016
20041,220
2005241
20061,830
20071,206
20081,771
20091,174
20101,188
20111,653
20121,512
20131,167
2014953
2015255
20161,337
20171,614
20181,238
2019861
2020940
20211,285
20221,061
20231,403
2024930
20251,188
2026558

Read against the river

Surprise Lakes and MUDDY RIVER BELOW CLEAR CREEK NEAR COUGAR, WA both sit in this drainage area, and their records overlap by 45 years. That is the span the two have in common, not a count of years both actually hold — either record may have gaps inside it. The two are shown separately rather than on one axis: millimetres of stored water and cubic metres per second are not commensurable, and a difference between them would mean nothing.

Being in the same drainage area does not put the snowpack upstream of the gauge. A subbasin is an area, and snow on one tributary can join the river below a gauge on another — so a weak relationship here may say more about which tributary was measured than about the snow.

Every gauge Hydrionis holds within this area

Gauges within the Lewis and what each holds
GaugeMeasuresValuesRecord
LEWIS RIVER AT ARIEL, WAburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year3431923–2026
EAST FORK LEWIS RIVER NEAR HEISSON, WAburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year3241929–2026
MUDDY RIVER BELOW CLEAR CREEK NEAR COUGAR, WAburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year2381927–2026
LEWIS RIVER ABOVE MUDDY RIVER NEAR COUGAR, WAcatchment area, annual maximum river flow481927–2026
CANYON CREEK NEAR AMBOY, WAcatchment area, annual maximum river flow321922–2026

How these gauges were attached to this water

Assigned by the publisher to a numbered basin Every gauge here is assigned to this drainage area by its own publisher, which issues the area an official code — 17080002. A drainage area is not a river: it contains the tributaries as well as the main channel, and a gauge in it may be on any of them.

What each gauge’s link to this water rests on
GaugeEvidenceEstablished
LEWIS RIVER AT ARIEL, WAStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
EAST FORK LEWIS RIVER NEAR HEISSON, WAStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
MUDDY RIVER BELOW CLEAR CREEK NEAR COUGAR, WAStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
LEWIS RIVER ABOVE MUDDY RIVER NEAR COUGAR, WAStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
CANYON CREEK NEAR AMBOY, WAStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02

What this record holds

Hydrionis decides which waters get a page, and which of those are offered to search, from what is actually held rather than from how the page reads. Five signals are counted; this record has 5 of them, which makes it a full profile.

Information-gain signals held for this water body
SignalHeldCounts
Gauges holding a real record3yes, 3 or more
Years spanned105yes, 20 or more
Values held3,855yes, 1000 or more
Distinct measurements6yes, 2 or more
Publishers measuring it2yes, 2 or more
Official identifiers1recorded, not counted

Use this data

Use this data

No bulk download is offered here, which is a licence position rather than a product one: at least one contributing publisher does not permit redistribution. The values can be read on the page, cited, and pointed to at source.

Attribution and citation

Suggested citation for Hydrionis

Hydrionis (2026), Lewis gauge records, accessed 2026-10-05, hydrionis.com/waters/united-states-lewis/

Cite Hydrionis where you rely on values Hydrionis computed, on the method that produced them, or on the compilation itself. The underlying measurements remain the publishers’ and their attribution requirements apply to you directly.

Recommended, not required. Hydrionis does not claim rights over unmodified public data it relayed, and doing arithmetic on somebody else’s measurements does not make them Hydrionis’s. Cite the version and the access date: the Lewis gauge records changes as publishers release and as methods are revised, and a citation without both cannot be checked later. Full guidance is on cite and reuse.

None of the contributing licences requires attribution. Crediting the publishers is still good practice and they are listed above.

Where these figures come from

MeasuredHigh confidence2025-02-21

Source: USGS — National Water Information System, USGS site 14220500, annual peak streamflow. Licence: Open.

Method: The instantaneous maximum discharge of each water year as published by USGS, dated to the day it occurred. One value per October-to-September water year; where the publisher lists both a systematic and a historic peak for a year, the larger is the annual maximum. Values the publisher marks as maximum daily averages are not held here, because they are not instantaneous peaks. Values marked as bounded rather than measured are held as censored observations carrying the bound. Cubic feet per second are converted to cubic metres per second and the publisher unit is recorded alongside.

Rating curves are extrapolated at extreme discharges, so the largest values in a peak series carry the largest measurement uncertainty. Data from the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System, a work of the United States government and therefore in the public domain.

Retrieved 1 October 2026.