The monitoring network within this area

Hydrionis holds 2,337 values from 2 gauges within it. Discharge is a property of a gauge and its reach, not of this drainage area, so this page reports the network and its records rather than a single figure.

2
Gauges
2,337
Values held
1896–2026
Record spans
Gauges within the Lake Washington huc8 subbasin
2 monitoring points, positioned as the publisher records them.
Gauges within the Lake Washington huc8 subbasinCEDAR RIVER AT CEDAR FALLS, WA, CEDAR RIVER NEAR LANDSBURG, WACEDAR RIVER AT CEDAR FALLS, WACEDAR RIVER NEAR LANDSBURG, WA

Flood peaks, as measured

This gauge's flood record, as measured. Unlike a daily mean it is the discharge at the moment the river was highest, which is the figure flood frequency analysis is built on.

Largest measured flow of each year at CEDAR RIVER NEAR LANDSBURG, WA
The highest instantaneous discharge the publisher recorded in each year — a flood peak as measured, not a daily average of one. 1896–2025.
Shading marks when something was recorded, not what caused the line.
Largest measured flow of each year at CEDAR RIVER NEAR LANDSBURG, WALargest measured flow of each year at CEDAR RIVER NEAR LANDSBURG, WA: CEDAR RIVER NEAR LANDSBURG, WA in m³/s, from 1896 to 2025.Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapse0200400m³/s18961916193119471965198319992014

Published by the gauge's own operator from its sub-daily record; Hydrionis stores the figure rather than recomputing it. A year the gauge did not cover produces no value rather than a low one, and the gaps are stated below the chart. A peak is a property of this gauge and its reach: a larger flood upstream or downstream of it is not in this series.

What the shaded periods are (1 event)

A shaded period marks when something was recorded, not what caused the shape of the line. Where the two coincide, they coincided.

Documented record — A documented event, compiled from cited sources after it happened. The dates are as good as the record, which for older events can mean the month rather than the day.

EventTypePeriodStandingAuthority
Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapseFlood2005-08-29 – 2005-09-30Documented record
Compiled record

Not shown on this chart

  • The 1976 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • The 2022 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Yorkshire drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cantareira water crisis, São Paulo — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cape Town Day Zero — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • European drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodCEDAR RIVER NEAR LANDSBURG, WA (m³/s)
189696.8
1897142
1901107
1903289
190457.2
190558.9
190657.2
1908144
190970.2
1910128
1911402
1913107
191537.7
191674.5
191763.4
191989.5
192052.7
192154.4
1923118
192487.8
192577.6
192648.7
192751.5
1928138
192933.4
193038.2
193134.0
1932138
1933122
1935118
193653.8
193751.0
193942.5
194053.2
194151.8
194260.6
194439.1
194555.8
1946119
194754.9
194949.6
195086.4
1951176
195249.3
195395.4
195577.0
195691.7
195844.5
195998.0
196166.5
196354.7
196466.3
1965131
196639.1
196761.4
196863.4
197045.9
197163.4
1972109
197478.4
197565.7
197735.4
197945.0
198164.6
1982113
198364.0
1984113
198545.3
1986116
198846.7
198947.9
199099.7
199146.2
199342.2
199433.1
199567.7
199759.2
199846.2
199975.3
200131.4
200263.4
200349.0
200459.2
200553.0
200683.5
200876.5
2009223
201046.2
2011133
201265.1
201348.1
201486.1
201570.5
201749.6
201860.0
2020215
202170.5
202289.2
202333.4
202556.1

About this series

Everything below is a property of the data rather than a rating of it. There is deliberately no single confidence score: how much a gap matters depends on what you are about to do with the series, and only you know that.

Source
United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain
How the values came to existMeasured
Period held1896–2025
Completeness76.9% of the periods in that span are held. Gaps are drawn as breaks and never interpolated.
Known gaps
  • 28 separate periods inside 1896–2025 hold no value. The longest runs from 1898 to 1900 — 3 years with no reading. They are drawn as breaks in the line and are never interpolated across.
ContinuityThe record begins in 1896 and is not continuous from it: 130 years separate the first value from the last, and 77% of the years between them are held. The span is not the record.
Last read from the publisher2026-10-01
RedistributionPermitted by the upstream licences
Commercial reusePermitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this.
MethodologyHow this was produced

How much of the rain came back out

A discharge in cubic metres per second cannot be compared with anything: the larger number may only mean the larger catchment. Divided by the area draining to the gauge it becomes a depth of water over that land, which answers a question a reader already has — of the rain that fell here, how much came back out as river?

Water leaving the catchment above CEDAR RIVER NEAR LANDSBURG, WA, as a depth
The year's flow spread over the land draining to this gauge, in millimetres — the same unit rainfall is measured in. 1896–2024.
Shading marks when something was recorded, not what caused the line.
Water leaving the catchment above CEDAR RIVER NEAR LANDSBURG, WA, as a depthWater leaving the catchment above CEDAR RIVER NEAR LANDSBURG, WA, as a depth: CEDAR RIVER NEAR LANDSBURG, WA in mm, from 1896 to 2024.Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapse1,0001,5002,0002,5003,000mm18961916193219481964198019962012

Computed by Hydrionis from the published annual mean flow and the catchment area the station's own publisher states. It is not a water balance: the difference between rainfall and runoff is not evaporation alone but also change in groundwater storage, water abstracted and taken elsewhere, and water imported by transfer schemes — which is why a catchment can yield more runoff than the rain that fell on it without anything being measured wrongly. A different area figure rescales every value here by the ratio between them.

What the shaded periods are (1 event)

A shaded period marks when something was recorded, not what caused the shape of the line. Where the two coincide, they coincided.

Documented record — A documented event, compiled from cited sources after it happened. The dates are as good as the record, which for older events can mean the month rather than the day.

EventTypePeriodStandingAuthority
Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapseFlood2005-08-29 – 2005-09-30Documented record
Compiled record

Not shown on this chart

  • The 1976 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • The 2022 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Yorkshire drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cantareira water crisis, São Paulo — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cape Town Day Zero — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • European drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodCEDAR RIVER NEAR LANDSBURG, WA (mm)
18962,778
18972,849
19021,944
19032,178
19041,806
19051,647
19062,112
19071,752
19081,914
19092,205
19102,048
19111,801
19121,936
19132,075
19141,797
19151,443
19162,434
19172,844
19182,294
19192,008
19201,955
19212,343
19221,509
19231,824
19241,673
19251,705
19261,422
19272,210
19281,705
19291,389
19301,359
19311,450
19322,550
19332,818
19342,019
19351,670
19361,758
19371,860
19381,518
19391,653
19401,406
19411,106
19421,708
19431,717
19441,239
19452,069
19462,204
19472,081
19482,209
19491,946
19502,583
19512,012
19521,369
19532,164
19542,063
19552,390
19562,394
19571,674
19581,962
19592,827
19602,068
19612,135
19621,728
19631,793
19642,451
19651,893
19661,874
19671,972
19682,266
19691,872
19701,826
19712,480
19722,759
19731,471
19742,490
19752,596
19761,916
19771,826
19781,554
19791,606
19801,725
19811,732
19822,091
19831,861
19842,031
19851,797
19861,840
19871,334
19881,711
19891,862
19902,675
19912,111
19921,268
19931,465
19941,518
19952,054
19962,264
19972,559
19981,758
19992,428
20001,620
20011,508
20021,900
20031,697
20041,682
20051,338
20062,222
20071,756
20082,071
20092,012
20101,866
20112,574
20122,535
20132,072
20142,328
20151,841
20161,905
20172,091
20182,096
20191,508
20202,524
20212,171
20222,228
20231,487
20241,542

About this series

Everything below is a property of the data rather than a rating of it. There is deliberately no single confidence score: how much a gap matters depends on what you are about to do with the series, and only you know that.

Source
United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain
How the values came to existDerived Computed by Hydrionis
Period held1896–2024
Completeness96.9% of the periods in that span are held. Gaps are drawn as breaks and never interpolated.
Known gaps
  • One period inside 1896–2024 holds no value: 1898 to 1901, 4 years with no reading. It is drawn as a break in the line and is never interpolated across.
ContinuityThe record begins in 1896 and is not continuous from it: 129 years separate the first value from the last, and 97% of the years between them are held. The span is not the record.
Inputs last read2026-10-01 · when the records this was computed from were last read from their publishers
Calculation date2026-08-24 · when the calculation method was last versioned, not a reading of any publisher
RedistributionPermitted by the upstream licences
Commercial reusePermitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this.
MethodologyHow this was produced

The snow standing above this water

4 automated snow stations sit inside this drainage area, weighing the snowpack rather than measuring how deep it is.

1,483
Fullest snowpack recorded at Meadows Pass, in 2008 (mm of water)
57
Thinnest, in 2005 (mm of water)
March
Month the pack is usually at its fullest
June
Month the pack has gone by, in half of years
Peak snowpack at Meadows Pass
Water years 1994–2026. Each point is the fullest month of that snow season.
Peak snowpack at Meadows PassPeak snowpack at Meadows Pass: Meadows Pass in mm, from 1994 to 2026.05001,0001,500mm1994199920042009201420192024Meadows Pass 1994: 295 mmMeadows Pass 1995: 452 mmMeadows Pass 1996: 280 mmMeadows Pass 1997: 1,124 mmMeadows Pass 1998: 567 mmMeadows Pass 1999: 921 mmMeadows Pass 2000: 736 mmMeadows Pass 2001: 430 mmMeadows Pass 2002: 1,017 mmMeadows Pass 2003: 413 mmMeadows Pass 2004: 608 mmMeadows Pass 2005: 57.0 mmMeadows Pass 2006: 991 mmMeadows Pass 2007: 770 mmMeadows Pass 2008: 1,483 mmMeadows Pass 2009: 967 mmMeadows Pass 2010: 310 mmMeadows Pass 2011: 876 mmMeadows Pass 2012: 1,094 mmMeadows Pass 2013: 806 mmMeadows Pass 2014: 639 mmMeadows Pass 2015: 101 mmMeadows Pass 2016: 711 mmMeadows Pass 2017: 752 mmMeadows Pass 2018: 709 mmMeadows Pass 2019: 497 mmMeadows Pass 2020: 687 mmMeadows Pass 2021: 989 mmMeadows Pass 2022: 693 mmMeadows Pass 2023: 725 mmMeadows Pass 2024: 544 mmMeadows Pass 2025: 440 mmMeadows Pass 2026: 312 mm

A water year runs October to September and is named for the year it ends, so the snow of one winter stays in one point. The value is the fullest month, not the fullest day: a pack that peaked sharply mid-month reads lower here than a single measurement taken at the right moment would.

View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodMeadows Pass (mm)
1994295
1995452
1996280
19971,124
1998567
1999921
2000736
2001430
20021,017
2003413
2004608
200557.0
2006991
2007770
20081,483
2009967
2010310
2011876
20121,094
2013806
2014639
2015101
2016711
2017752
2018709
2019497
2020687
2021989
2022693
2023725
2024544
2025440
2026312

Read against the river

Meadows Pass and CEDAR RIVER AT CEDAR FALLS, WA both sit in this drainage area, and their records overlap by 31 years. That is the span the two have in common, not a count of years both actually hold — either record may have gaps inside it. The two are shown separately rather than on one axis: millimetres of stored water and cubic metres per second are not commensurable, and a difference between them would mean nothing.

Being in the same drainage area does not put the snowpack upstream of the gauge. A subbasin is an area, and snow on one tributary can join the river below a gauge on another — so a weak relationship here may say more about which tributary was measured than about the snow.

Every gauge Hydrionis holds within this area

Gauges within the Lake Washington and what each holds
GaugeMeasuresValuesRecord
CEDAR RIVER NEAR LANDSBURG, WAburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year4131896–2026
CEDAR RIVER AT CEDAR FALLS, WAburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year3691914–2026

How these gauges were attached to this water

Assigned by the publisher to a numbered basin Every gauge here is assigned to this drainage area by its own publisher, which issues the area an official code — 17110012. A drainage area is not a river: it contains the tributaries as well as the main channel, and a gauge in it may be on any of them.

What each gauge’s link to this water rests on
GaugeEvidenceEstablished
CEDAR RIVER NEAR LANDSBURG, WAStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
CEDAR RIVER AT CEDAR FALLS, WAStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02

What this record holds

Hydrionis decides which waters get a page, and which of those are offered to search, from what is actually held rather than from how the page reads. Five signals are counted; this record has 4 of them, which makes it a full profile.

Information-gain signals held for this water body
SignalHeldCounts
Gauges holding a real record2no
Years spanned131yes, 20 or more
Values held2,337yes, 1000 or more
Distinct measurements6yes, 2 or more
Publishers measuring it2yes, 2 or more
Official identifiers1recorded, not counted

Use this data

Use this data

No bulk download is offered here, which is a licence position rather than a product one: at least one contributing publisher does not permit redistribution. The values can be read on the page, cited, and pointed to at source.

Attribution and citation

Suggested citation for Hydrionis

Hydrionis (2026), Lake Washington gauge records, accessed 2026-10-05, hydrionis.com/waters/united-states-lake-washington/

Cite Hydrionis where you rely on values Hydrionis computed, on the method that produced them, or on the compilation itself. The underlying measurements remain the publishers’ and their attribution requirements apply to you directly.

Recommended, not required. Hydrionis does not claim rights over unmodified public data it relayed, and doing arithmetic on somebody else’s measurements does not make them Hydrionis’s. Cite the version and the access date: the Lake Washington gauge records changes as publishers release and as methods are revised, and a citation without both cannot be checked later. Full guidance is on cite and reuse.

None of the contributing licences requires attribution. Crediting the publishers is still good practice and they are listed above.

Where these figures come from

MeasuredHigh confidence2025-02-23

Source: USGS — National Water Information System, USGS site 12117500, annual peak streamflow. Licence: Open.

Method: The instantaneous maximum discharge of each water year as published by USGS, dated to the day it occurred. One value per October-to-September water year; where the publisher lists both a systematic and a historic peak for a year, the larger is the annual maximum. Values the publisher marks as maximum daily averages are not held here, because they are not instantaneous peaks. Values marked as bounded rather than measured are held as censored observations carrying the bound. Cubic feet per second are converted to cubic metres per second and the publisher unit is recorded alongside.

Rating curves are extrapolated at extreme discharges, so the largest values in a peak series carry the largest measurement uncertainty. Data from the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System, a work of the United States government and therefore in the public domain.

Retrieved 1 October 2026.