The monitoring network within this area

Hydrionis holds 7,095 values from 9 gauges within it. Discharge is a property of a gauge and its reach, not of this drainage area, so this page reports the network and its records rather than a single figure.

9
Gauges
7,095
Values held
1899–2026
Record spans
Gauges within the Colorado Headwaters huc8 subbasin
9 monitoring points, positioned as the publisher records them.
Gauges within the Colorado Headwaters huc8 subbasinWILLIAMS FORK NEAR PARSHALL, CO, COLORADO RIVER NEAR KREMMLING, CO, COLORADO RIVER AT GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO., COLORADO RIVER NEAR GRAND LAKE, CO., FRASER RIVER AT WINTER PARK, CO., COLORADO RIVER NEAR GRANBY, CO, FRASER RIVER AT GRANBY, CO., COLORADO RIVER AT HOT SULPHUR SPRINGS, CO., TROUBLESOME CREEK NEAR TROUBLESOME, CO.WILLIAMS FORK NEAR PARSHALL, COCOLORADO RIVER NEAR KREMMLING, COCOLORADO RIVER AT GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO.COLORADO RIVER NEAR GRAND LAKE, CO.FRASER RIVER AT WINTER PARK, CO.COLORADO RIVER NEAR GRANBY, COFRASER RIVER AT GRANBY, CO.COLORADO RIVER AT HOT SULPHUR SPRINGS, CO.TROUBLESOME CREEK NEAR TROUBLESOME, CO.

Flood peaks, as measured

This gauge's flood record, as measured. Unlike a daily mean it is the discharge at the moment the river was highest, which is the figure flood frequency analysis is built on.

Largest measured flow of each year at FRASER RIVER AT WINTER PARK, CO.
The highest instantaneous discharge the publisher recorded in each year — a flood peak as measured, not a daily average of one. 1911–2025.
Shading marks when something was recorded, not what caused the line.
Largest measured flow of each year at FRASER RIVER AT WINTER PARK, CO.Largest measured flow of each year at FRASER RIVER AT WINTER PARK, CO.: FRASER RIVER AT WINTER PARK, CO. in m³/s, from 1911 to 2025.Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapse01020m³/s19111926194019571972198620002014

Published by the gauge's own operator from its sub-daily record; Hydrionis stores the figure rather than recomputing it. A year the gauge did not cover produces no value rather than a low one, and the gaps are stated below the chart. A peak is a property of this gauge and its reach: a larger flood upstream or downstream of it is not in this series.

What the shaded periods are (1 event)

A shaded period marks when something was recorded, not what caused the shape of the line. Where the two coincide, they coincided.

Documented record — A documented event, compiled from cited sources after it happened. The dates are as good as the record, which for older events can mean the month rather than the day.

EventTypePeriodStandingAuthority
Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapseFlood2005-08-29 – 2005-09-30Documented record
Compiled record

Not shown on this chart

  • The 1976 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • The 2022 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Yorkshire drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cantareira water crisis, São Paulo — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cape Town Day Zero — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • European drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodFRASER RIVER AT WINTER PARK, CO. (m³/s)
19118.61
19138.44
191414.6
191517.2
19167.36
19179.80
191823.2
19194.76
19209.12
192114.9
19229.51
192312.5
192412.5
19257.19
192610.8
19276.65
19289.91
19299.12
19309.37
19315.72
19325.44
193310.6
19344.87
193510.6
19367.90
19374.25
19384.30
19394.73
19400.991
19429.23
19434.45
19446.48
19453.74
19477.87
19488.35
194910.2
19501.30
19519.00
195213.3
19536.71
19551.02
19564.22
195715.1
19588.86
19595.04
19607.14
19614.13
19624.81
19630.680
19640.793
19657.87
19674.53
19682.75
19698.61
19707.62
197110.9
19726.26
197314.4
19747.53
19754.59
19760.991
19771.16
19783.85
19797.50
19808.83
19812.27
19824.81
198317.7
198411.9
19855.55
19868.52
19876.12
19887.67
19891.39
19901.87
19916.85
19925.49
19936.54
19944.22
199514.4
19968.35
199712.3
19985.83
19995.83
20003.20
20012.97
20020.510
20038.33
20040.765
20056.20
20064.45
20077.31
20084.59
20096.91
201010.1
20119.32
20121.70
20134.56
20149.94
20158.61
20168.58
20176.80
20184.11
20197.70
20206.29
20213.79
20226.46
20238.24
202410.4
20255.89

About this series

Everything below is a property of the data rather than a rating of it. There is deliberately no single confidence score: how much a gap matters depends on what you are about to do with the series, and only you know that.

Source
United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain
How the values came to existMeasured
Period held1911–2025
Completeness95.7% of the periods in that span are held. Gaps are drawn as breaks and never interpolated.
Known gaps
  • 5 separate periods inside 1911–2025 hold no value. They are drawn as breaks in the line and are never interpolated across.
ContinuityThe record begins in 1911 and is not continuous from it: 115 years separate the first value from the last, and 96% of the years between them are held. The span is not the record.
Last read from the publisher2026-10-01
RedistributionPermitted by the upstream licences
Commercial reusePermitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this.
MethodologyHow this was produced

How much of the rain came back out

A discharge in cubic metres per second cannot be compared with anything: the larger number may only mean the larger catchment. Divided by the area draining to the gauge it becomes a depth of water over that land, which answers a question a reader already has — of the rain that fell here, how much came back out as river?

Water leaving the catchment above FRASER RIVER AT WINTER PARK, CO., as a depth
The year's flow spread over the land draining to this gauge, in millimetres — the same unit rainfall is measured in. 1911–2024.
Shading marks when something was recorded, not what caused the line.
Water leaving the catchment above FRASER RIVER AT WINTER PARK, CO., as a depthWater leaving the catchment above FRASER RIVER AT WINTER PARK, CO., as a depth: FRASER RIVER AT WINTER PARK, CO. in mm, from 1911 to 2024.Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapse0200400600800mm19111926194119561971198620012016

Computed by Hydrionis from the published annual mean flow and the catchment area the station's own publisher states. It is not a water balance: the difference between rainfall and runoff is not evaporation alone but also change in groundwater storage, water abstracted and taken elsewhere, and water imported by transfer schemes — which is why a catchment can yield more runoff than the rain that fell on it without anything being measured wrongly. A different area figure rescales every value here by the ratio between them.

What the shaded periods are (1 event)

A shaded period marks when something was recorded, not what caused the shape of the line. Where the two coincide, they coincided.

Documented record — A documented event, compiled from cited sources after it happened. The dates are as good as the record, which for older events can mean the month rather than the day.

EventTypePeriodStandingAuthority
Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapseFlood2005-08-29 – 2005-09-30Documented record
Compiled record

Not shown on this chart

  • The 1976 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • The 2022 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Yorkshire drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cantareira water crisis, São Paulo — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cape Town Day Zero — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • European drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodFRASER RIVER AT WINTER PARK, CO. (mm)
1911558
1912684
1913452
1914741
1915700
1916531
1917531
1918772
1919391
1920529
1921677
1922431
1923576
1924515
1925507
1926661
1927568
1928675
1929617
1930548
1931361
1932433
1933578
1934346
1935463
1936370
1937216
1938192
1939151
1940122
1941126
1942418
1943120
1944215
1945125
1946119
1947377
1948254
1949381
1950117
1951201
1952258
1953106
195469.0
195591.0
1956125
1957570
1958342
1959145
1960222
1961164
1962237
196379.0
196481.0
1965254
196687.0
1967161
1968100
1969326
1970329
1971396
1972174
1973362
1974229
1975192
1976108
197787.0
1978147
1979226
1980273
198187.0
1982135
1983547
1984587
1985150
1986214
1987186
1988157
1989100
1990106
1991184
1992195
1993341
1994191
1995562
1996401
1997392
1998329
1999309
2000175
2001155
200280.0
2003196
200496.0
2005205
2006135
2007326
2008154
2009314
2010326
2011458
2012116
2013195
2014386
2015392
2016321
2017221
2018204
2019206
2020218
2021150
2022215
2023415
2024338

About this series

Everything below is a property of the data rather than a rating of it. There is deliberately no single confidence score: how much a gap matters depends on what you are about to do with the series, and only you know that.

Source
United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain
How the values came to existDerived Computed by Hydrionis
Period held1911–2024
Completeness100.0% of the periods in that span are held.
ContinuityContinuous: every year from 1911 to 2024 is held.
Inputs last read2026-10-01 · when the records this was computed from were last read from their publishers
Calculation date2026-08-24 · when the calculation method was last versioned, not a reading of any publisher
RedistributionPermitted by the upstream licences
Commercial reusePermitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this.
MethodologyHow this was produced

The snow standing above this water

13 automated snow stations sit inside this drainage area, weighing the snowpack rather than measuring how deep it is.

841
Fullest snowpack recorded at Berthoud Summit, in 2011 (mm of water)
262
Thinnest, in 2002 (mm of water)
April
Month the pack is usually at its fullest
June
Month the pack has gone by, in half of years
Peak snowpack at Berthoud Summit
Water years 1979–2026. Each point is the fullest month of that snow season.
Peak snowpack at Berthoud SummitPeak snowpack at Berthoud Summit: Berthoud Summit in mm, from 1979 to 2026.02505007501,000mm19791985199119972003200920152021Berthoud Summit 1979: 507 mmBerthoud Summit 1980: 641 mmBerthoud Summit 1981: 315 mmBerthoud Summit 1982: 565 mmBerthoud Summit 1983: 772 mmBerthoud Summit 1984: 717 mmBerthoud Summit 1985: 509 mmBerthoud Summit 1986: 603 mmBerthoud Summit 1987: 422 mmBerthoud Summit 1988: 530 mmBerthoud Summit 1989: 503 mmBerthoud Summit 1990: 373 mmBerthoud Summit 1991: 523 mmBerthoud Summit 1992: 548 mmBerthoud Summit 1993: 686 mmBerthoud Summit 1994: 484 mmBerthoud Summit 1995: 538 mmBerthoud Summit 1996: 701 mmBerthoud Summit 1997: 679 mmBerthoud Summit 1998: 550 mmBerthoud Summit 1999: 492 mmBerthoud Summit 2000: 458 mmBerthoud Summit 2001: 523 mmBerthoud Summit 2002: 262 mmBerthoud Summit 2003: 562 mmBerthoud Summit 2004: 360 mmBerthoud Summit 2005: 439 mmBerthoud Summit 2006: 568 mmBerthoud Summit 2007: 493 mmBerthoud Summit 2008: 589 mmBerthoud Summit 2009: 566 mmBerthoud Summit 2010: 520 mmBerthoud Summit 2011: 841 mmBerthoud Summit 2012: 309 mmBerthoud Summit 2013: 476 mmBerthoud Summit 2014: 650 mmBerthoud Summit 2015: 452 mmBerthoud Summit 2016: 550 mmBerthoud Summit 2017: 443 mmBerthoud Summit 2018: 443 mmBerthoud Summit 2019: 547 mmBerthoud Summit 2020: 592 mmBerthoud Summit 2021: 470 mmBerthoud Summit 2022: 400 mmBerthoud Summit 2023: 494 mmBerthoud Summit 2024: 573 mmBerthoud Summit 2025: 536 mmBerthoud Summit 2026: 263 mm

A water year runs October to September and is named for the year it ends, so the snow of one winter stays in one point. The value is the fullest month, not the fullest day: a pack that peaked sharply mid-month reads lower here than a single measurement taken at the right moment would.

View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodBerthoud Summit (mm)
1979507
1980641
1981315
1982565
1983772
1984717
1985509
1986603
1987422
1988530
1989503
1990373
1991523
1992548
1993686
1994484
1995538
1996701
1997679
1998550
1999492
2000458
2001523
2002262
2003562
2004360
2005439
2006568
2007493
2008589
2009566
2010520
2011841
2012309
2013476
2014650
2015452
2016550
2017443
2018443
2019547
2020592
2021470
2022400
2023494
2024573
2025536
2026263

Read against the river

Berthoud Summit and WILLIAMS FORK NEAR PARSHALL, CO both sit in this drainage area, and their records overlap by 46 years. That is the span the two have in common, not a count of years both actually hold — either record may have gaps inside it. The two are shown separately rather than on one axis: millimetres of stored water and cubic metres per second are not commensurable, and a difference between them would mean nothing.

Being in the same drainage area does not put the snowpack upstream of the gauge. A subbasin is an area, and snow on one tributary can join the river below a gauge on another — so a weak relationship here may say more about which tributary was measured than about the snow.

Every gauge Hydrionis holds within this area

Gauges within the Colorado Headwaters and what each holds
GaugeMeasuresValuesRecord
FRASER RIVER AT WINTER PARK, CO.burned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year3791910–2026
WILLIAMS FORK NEAR PARSHALL, COburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year3681904–2026
COLORADO RIVER NEAR KREMMLING, COburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year2371905–2026
COLORADO RIVER AT GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO.burned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year2361899–2026
COLORADO RIVER NEAR GRAND LAKE, CO.burned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year2281904–2026
COLORADO RIVER NEAR GRANBY, COcatchment area, annual maximum river flow891908–2026
COLORADO RIVER AT HOT SULPHUR SPRINGS, CO.catchment area, annual maximum river flow871905–2026
TROUBLESOME CREEK NEAR TROUBLESOME, CO.catchment area, annual maximum river flow291905–2026
FRASER RIVER AT GRANBY, CO.catchment area, annual maximum river flow241905–2026

How these gauges were attached to this water

Assigned by the publisher to a numbered basin Every gauge here is assigned to this drainage area by its own publisher, which issues the area an official code — 14010001. A drainage area is not a river: it contains the tributaries as well as the main channel, and a gauge in it may be on any of them.

What each gauge’s link to this water rests on
GaugeEvidenceEstablished
FRASER RIVER AT WINTER PARK, CO.Stated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
WILLIAMS FORK NEAR PARSHALL, COStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
COLORADO RIVER NEAR KREMMLING, COStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
COLORADO RIVER AT GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO.Stated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
COLORADO RIVER NEAR GRAND LAKE, CO.Stated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
COLORADO RIVER NEAR GRANBY, COStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
COLORADO RIVER AT HOT SULPHUR SPRINGS, CO.Stated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
TROUBLESOME CREEK NEAR TROUBLESOME, CO.Stated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
FRASER RIVER AT GRANBY, CO.Stated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02

What this record holds

Hydrionis decides which waters get a page, and which of those are offered to search, from what is actually held rather than from how the page reads. Five signals are counted; this record has 5 of them, which makes it a full profile.

Information-gain signals held for this water body
SignalHeldCounts
Gauges holding a real record7yes, 3 or more
Years spanned128yes, 20 or more
Values held7,095yes, 1000 or more
Distinct measurements6yes, 2 or more
Publishers measuring it2yes, 2 or more
Official identifiers1recorded, not counted

Use this data

Use this data

No bulk download is offered here, which is a licence position rather than a product one: at least one contributing publisher does not permit redistribution. The values can be read on the page, cited, and pointed to at source.

Attribution and citation

Suggested citation for Hydrionis

Hydrionis (2026), Colorado Headwaters gauge records, accessed 2026-10-05, hydrionis.com/waters/united-states-colorado-headwaters/

Cite Hydrionis where you rely on values Hydrionis computed, on the method that produced them, or on the compilation itself. The underlying measurements remain the publishers’ and their attribution requirements apply to you directly.

Recommended, not required. Hydrionis does not claim rights over unmodified public data it relayed, and doing arithmetic on somebody else’s measurements does not make them Hydrionis’s. Cite the version and the access date: the Colorado Headwaters gauge records changes as publishers release and as methods are revised, and a citation without both cannot be checked later. Full guidance is on cite and reuse.

None of the contributing licences requires attribution. Crediting the publishers is still good practice and they are listed above.

Where these figures come from

MeasuredHigh confidence2025-06-11

Source: USGS — National Water Information System, USGS site 09024000, annual peak streamflow. Licence: Open.

Method: The instantaneous maximum discharge of each water year as published by USGS, dated to the day it occurred. One value per October-to-September water year; where the publisher lists both a systematic and a historic peak for a year, the larger is the annual maximum. Values the publisher marks as maximum daily averages are not held here, because they are not instantaneous peaks. Values marked as bounded rather than measured are held as censored observations carrying the bound. Cubic feet per second are converted to cubic metres per second and the publisher unit is recorded alongside.

Rating curves are extrapolated at extreme discharges, so the largest values in a peak series carry the largest measurement uncertainty. Data from the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System, a work of the United States government and therefore in the public domain.

Retrieved 1 October 2026.