The monitoring network within this area

Hydrionis holds 708 values from 3 gauges within it. Discharge is a property of a gauge and its reach, not of this drainage area, so this page reports the network and its records rather than a single figure.

3
Gauges
708
Values held
1920–2026
Record spans
Gauges within the Buffalo huc8 subbasin
3 monitoring points, positioned as the publisher records them.
Gauges within the Buffalo huc8 subbasinBUFFALO RIVER NEAR FLAT WOODS, TN, BUFFALO RIVER BELOW LOBELVILLE, TN, BUFFALO RIVER NEAR LOBELVILLE, TNBUFFALO RIVER NEAR FLAT WOODS, TNBUFFALO RIVER BELOW LOBELVILLE, TNBUFFALO RIVER NEAR LOBELVILLE, TN

Flood peaks, as measured

This gauge's flood record, as measured. Unlike a daily mean it is the discharge at the moment the river was highest, which is the figure flood frequency analysis is built on.

Largest measured flow of each year at BUFFALO RIVER NEAR FLAT WOODS, TN
The highest instantaneous discharge the publisher recorded in each year — a flood peak as measured, not a daily average of one. 1921–2024.
Shading marks when something was recorded, not what caused the line.
Largest measured flow of each year at BUFFALO RIVER NEAR FLAT WOODS, TNLargest measured flow of each year at BUFFALO RIVER NEAR FLAT WOODS, TN: BUFFALO RIVER NEAR FLAT WOODS, TN in m³/s, from 1921 to 2024.Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapse01,0002,0003,000m³/s19211934194819621977199320062018

Published by the gauge's own operator from its sub-daily record; Hydrionis stores the figure rather than recomputing it. A year the gauge did not cover produces no value rather than a low one, and the gaps are stated below the chart. A peak is a property of this gauge and its reach: a larger flood upstream or downstream of it is not in this series.

What the shaded periods are (1 event)

A shaded period marks when something was recorded, not what caused the shape of the line. Where the two coincide, they coincided.

Documented record — A documented event, compiled from cited sources after it happened. The dates are as good as the record, which for older events can mean the month rather than the day.

EventTypePeriodStandingAuthority
Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapseFlood2005-08-29 – 2005-09-30Documented record
Compiled record

Not shown on this chart

  • The 1976 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • The 2022 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Yorkshire drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cantareira water crisis, São Paulo — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cape Town Day Zero — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • European drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodBUFFALO RIVER NEAR FLAT WOODS, TN (m³/s)
1921405
1922634
1923439
1924504
1925215
1926129
19271,478
1928253
1929600
1930261
1931125
1932572
1934481
1935445
1936343
1937680
1938425
1939215
1940498
1942116
1944365
1945648
1946623
1947231
19482,549
1949365
1950538
1951470
1953379
1954433
19551,877
1956391
1957487
1959208
1960306
1961405
1962578
1963354
1964278
1965513
1966188
1967748
1968277
1969343
1971244
1972158
19731,189
19751,705
1977637
1979510
19801,206
1981131
1982282
1984629
1986233
1987343
1988408
1989575
1990756
19912,727
1993178
1994629
1995425
1996289
1997685
1998776
1999595
2000183
2001640
2002835
20031,002
2004838
2006399
2007125
2008334
2009561
20102,636
2011566
2012131
2013264
2014572
2015394
2016476
2017220
2018920
2019886
2020490
2021762
2022453
2023273
2024345

About this series

Everything below is a property of the data rather than a rating of it. There is deliberately no single confidence score: how much a gap matters depends on what you are about to do with the series, and only you know that.

Source
United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain
How the values came to existMeasured
Period held1921–2024
Completeness87.5% of the periods in that span are held. Gaps are drawn as breaks and never interpolated.
Known gaps
  • 13 separate periods inside 1921–2024 hold no value. They are drawn as breaks in the line and are never interpolated across.
ContinuityThe record begins in 1921 and is not continuous from it: 104 years separate the first value from the last, and 88% of the years between them are held. The span is not the record.
Last read from the publisher2026-10-01
RedistributionPermitted by the upstream licences
Commercial reusePermitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this.
MethodologyHow this was produced

How much of the rain came back out

A discharge in cubic metres per second cannot be compared with anything: the larger number may only mean the larger catchment. Divided by the area draining to the gauge it becomes a depth of water over that land, which answers a question a reader already has — of the rain that fell here, how much came back out as river?

Water leaving the catchment above BUFFALO RIVER NEAR FLAT WOODS, TN, as a depth
The year's flow spread over the land draining to this gauge, in millimetres — the same unit rainfall is measured in. 1921–2025.
Shading marks when something was recorded, not what caused the line.
Water leaving the catchment above BUFFALO RIVER NEAR FLAT WOODS, TN, as a depthWater leaving the catchment above BUFFALO RIVER NEAR FLAT WOODS, TN, as a depth: BUFFALO RIVER NEAR FLAT WOODS, TN in mm, from 1921 to 2025.Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapse2505007501,000mm19211935194919631977199120052019

Computed by Hydrionis from the published annual mean flow and the catchment area the station's own publisher states. It is not a water balance: the difference between rainfall and runoff is not evaporation alone but also change in groundwater storage, water abstracted and taken elsewhere, and water imported by transfer schemes — which is why a catchment can yield more runoff than the rain that fell on it without anything being measured wrongly. A different area figure rescales every value here by the ratio between them.

What the shaded periods are (1 event)

A shaded period marks when something was recorded, not what caused the shape of the line. Where the two coincide, they coincided.

Documented record — A documented event, compiled from cited sources after it happened. The dates are as good as the record, which for older events can mean the month rather than the day.

EventTypePeriodStandingAuthority
Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapseFlood2005-08-29 – 2005-09-30Documented record
Compiled record

Not shown on this chart

  • The 1976 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • The 2022 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Yorkshire drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cantareira water crisis, São Paulo — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cape Town Day Zero — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • European drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodBUFFALO RIVER NEAR FLAT WOODS, TN (mm)
1921511
1922614
1923755
1924423
1925308
1926538
1927668
1928416
1929724
1930492
1931401
1932872
1933784
1934362
1935502
1936451
1937601
1938479
1939613
1940422
1941232
1942321
1943309
1944749
1945799
1946602
1947475
1948787
1949602
1950864
1951870
1952523
1953587
1954418
1955544
1956487
1957793
1958413
1959449
1960466
1961490
1962678
1963339
1964691
1965552
1966348
1967614
1968513
1969524
1970528
1971494
1972708
19731,132
1974855
1975911
1976508
1977687
1978515
1979933
1980773
1981344
1982649
1983893
1984663
1985435
1986373
1987372
1988382
1989918
1990656
19911,118
1992532
1993505
1994853
1995537
1996628
1997748
1998695
1999566
2000365
2001692
2002730
2003794
2004758
2005483
2006384
2007282
2008458
2009682
2010698
2011562
2012387
2013587
2014614
2015595
2016434
2017537
2018739
2019855
2020921
2021858
2022647
2023514
2024441
2025524

About this series

Everything below is a property of the data rather than a rating of it. There is deliberately no single confidence score: how much a gap matters depends on what you are about to do with the series, and only you know that.

Source
United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain
How the values came to existDerived Computed by Hydrionis
Period held1921–2025
Completeness100.0% of the periods in that span are held.
ContinuityContinuous: every year from 1921 to 2025 is held.
Inputs last read2026-10-01 · when the records this was computed from were last read from their publishers
Calculation date2026-08-24 · when the calculation method was last versioned, not a reading of any publisher
RedistributionPermitted by the upstream licences
Commercial reusePermitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this.
MethodologyHow this was produced

Every gauge Hydrionis holds within this area

Gauges within the Buffalo and what each holds
GaugeMeasuresValuesRecord
BUFFALO RIVER NEAR FLAT WOODS, TNburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year3511920–2026
BUFFALO RIVER BELOW LOBELVILLE, TNcatchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year1831927–2026
BUFFALO RIVER NEAR LOBELVILLE, TNcatchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year1741927–2026

How these gauges were attached to this water

Assigned by the publisher to a numbered basin Every gauge here is assigned to this drainage area by its own publisher, which issues the area an official code — 06040004. A drainage area is not a river: it contains the tributaries as well as the main channel, and a gauge in it may be on any of them.

What each gauge’s link to this water rests on
GaugeEvidenceEstablished
BUFFALO RIVER NEAR FLAT WOODS, TNStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
BUFFALO RIVER BELOW LOBELVILLE, TNStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
BUFFALO RIVER NEAR LOBELVILLE, TNStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02

What this record holds

Hydrionis decides which waters get a page, and which of those are offered to search, from what is actually held rather than from how the page reads. Five signals are counted; this record has 4 of them, which makes it a full profile.

Information-gain signals held for this water body
SignalHeldCounts
Gauges holding a real record3yes, 3 or more
Years spanned107yes, 20 or more
Values held708no
Distinct measurements5yes, 2 or more
Publishers measuring it2yes, 2 or more
Official identifiers1recorded, not counted

Use this data

Use this data

No bulk download is offered here, which is a licence position rather than a product one: at least one contributing publisher does not permit redistribution. The values can be read on the page, cited, and pointed to at source.

Attribution and citation

Suggested citation for Hydrionis

Hydrionis (2026), Buffalo gauge records, accessed 2026-10-05, hydrionis.com/waters/united-states-buffalo/

Cite Hydrionis where you rely on values Hydrionis computed, on the method that produced them, or on the compilation itself. The underlying measurements remain the publishers’ and their attribution requirements apply to you directly.

Recommended, not required. Hydrionis does not claim rights over unmodified public data it relayed, and doing arithmetic on somebody else’s measurements does not make them Hydrionis’s. Cite the version and the access date: the Buffalo gauge records changes as publishers release and as methods are revised, and a citation without both cannot be checked later. Full guidance is on cite and reuse.

None of the contributing licences requires attribution. Crediting the publishers is still good practice and they are listed above.

Where these figures come from

MeasuredHigh confidence2024-03-15

Source: USGS — National Water Information System, USGS site 03604000, annual peak streamflow. Licence: Open.

Method: The instantaneous maximum discharge of each water year as published by USGS, dated to the day it occurred. One value per October-to-September water year; where the publisher lists both a systematic and a historic peak for a year, the larger is the annual maximum. Values the publisher marks as maximum daily averages are not held here, because they are not instantaneous peaks. Values marked as bounded rather than measured are held as censored observations carrying the bound. Cubic feet per second are converted to cubic metres per second and the publisher unit is recorded alongside.

Rating curves are extrapolated at extreme discharges, so the largest values in a peak series carry the largest measurement uncertainty. Data from the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System, a work of the United States government and therefore in the public domain.

Retrieved 1 October 2026.