The monitoring network within this area

Hydrionis holds 948 values from 3 gauges within it. Discharge is a property of a gauge and its reach, not of this drainage area, so this page reports the network and its records rather than a single figure.

3
Gauges
948
Values held
1922–2026
Record spans
Gauges within the Beaver-Camas huc8 subbasin
3 monitoring points, positioned as the publisher records them.
Gauges within the Beaver-Camas huc8 subbasinCAMAS CREEK AT CAMAS ID, BEAVER CREEK AT DUBOIS ID, BEAVER CREEK NR CAMAS IDCAMAS CREEK AT CAMAS IDBEAVER CREEK AT DUBOIS IDBEAVER CREEK NR CAMAS ID

Flood peaks, as measured

This gauge's flood record, as measured. Unlike a daily mean it is the discharge at the moment the river was highest, which is the figure flood frequency analysis is built on.

Largest measured flow of each year at CAMAS CREEK AT CAMAS ID
The highest instantaneous discharge the publisher recorded in each year — a flood peak as measured, not a daily average of one. 1927–2025.
Shading marks when something was recorded, not what caused the line.
Largest measured flow of each year at CAMAS CREEK AT CAMAS IDLargest measured flow of each year at CAMAS CREEK AT CAMAS ID: CAMAS CREEK AT CAMAS ID in m³/s, from 1927 to 2025.Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapse02040m³/s19271940195319641975198619992016

Published by the gauge's own operator from its sub-daily record; Hydrionis stores the figure rather than recomputing it. A year the gauge did not cover produces no value rather than a low one, and the gaps are stated below the chart. A peak is a property of this gauge and its reach: a larger flood upstream or downstream of it is not in this series.

What the shaded periods are (1 event)

A shaded period marks when something was recorded, not what caused the shape of the line. Where the two coincide, they coincided.

Documented record — A documented event, compiled from cited sources after it happened. The dates are as good as the record, which for older events can mean the month rather than the day.

EventTypePeriodStandingAuthority
Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapseFlood2005-08-29 – 2005-09-30Documented record
Compiled record

Not shown on this chart

  • The 1976 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • The 2022 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Yorkshire drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cantareira water crisis, São Paulo — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cape Town Day Zero — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • European drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodCAMAS CREEK AT CAMAS ID (m³/s)
19275.78
19302.61
19314.13
19329.49
19336.09
19341.10
19355.15
193612.6
19378.01
193825.5
19397.22
19406.97
19415.95
194215.0
194313.0
19447.62
194622.5
194714.8
194813.3
194913.3
195014.0
195234.5
195313.1
19548.98
195513.4
195615.1
195722.0
195819.6
19596.51
196015.0
19614.93
196226.1
19635.89
196419.3
196520.0
19666.65
196722.0
19688.50
196925.5
197020.0
197120.2
197210.9
197321.1
197417.6
197517.4
197622.0
197712.1
197819.9
197913.9
198017.6
198118.4
198225.1
198328.1
198437.4
198512.5
198620.0
198711.7
198813.1
198921.5
19906.97
19917.31
19925.97
199340.2
199411.3
199534.5
199842.2
199932.8
200534.0
200642.5
200818.7
200916.9
20108.86
201137.4
201210.4
20134.87
20141.78
20151.19
201614.9
201719.1
201837.9
201916.1
202015.0
20212.09
20224.08
202336.0
202410.00
20254.84

About this series

Everything below is a property of the data rather than a rating of it. There is deliberately no single confidence score: how much a gap matters depends on what you are about to do with the series, and only you know that.

Source
United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain
How the values came to existMeasured
Period held1927–2025
Completeness87.9% of the periods in that span are held. Gaps are drawn as breaks and never interpolated.
Known gaps
  • 6 separate periods inside 1927–2025 hold no value. The longest runs from 2000 to 2004 — 5 years with no reading. They are drawn as breaks in the line and are never interpolated across.
ContinuityThe record begins in 1927 and is not continuous from it: 99 years separate the first value from the last, and 88% of the years between them are held. The span is not the record.
Last read from the publisher2026-10-01
RedistributionPermitted by the upstream licences
Commercial reusePermitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this.
MethodologyHow this was produced

How much of the rain came back out

A discharge in cubic metres per second cannot be compared with anything: the larger number may only mean the larger catchment. Divided by the area draining to the gauge it becomes a depth of water over that land, which answers a question a reader already has — of the rain that fell here, how much came back out as river?

Water leaving the catchment above CAMAS CREEK AT CAMAS ID, as a depth
The year's flow spread over the land draining to this gauge, in millimetres — the same unit rainfall is measured in. 1927–2024.
Shading marks when something was recorded, not what caused the line.
Water leaving the catchment above CAMAS CREEK AT CAMAS ID, as a depthWater leaving the catchment above CAMAS CREEK AT CAMAS ID, as a depth: CAMAS CREEK AT CAMAS ID in mm, from 1927 to 2024.Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapse0255075100mm19271938194919601973199120022013

Computed by Hydrionis from the published annual mean flow and the catchment area the station's own publisher states. It is not a water balance: the difference between rainfall and runoff is not evaporation alone but also change in groundwater storage, water abstracted and taken elsewhere, and water imported by transfer schemes — which is why a catchment can yield more runoff than the rain that fell on it without anything being measured wrongly. A different area figure rescales every value here by the ratio between them.

What the shaded periods are (1 event)

A shaded period marks when something was recorded, not what caused the shape of the line. Where the two coincide, they coincided.

Documented record — A documented event, compiled from cited sources after it happened. The dates are as good as the record, which for older events can mean the month rather than the day.

EventTypePeriodStandingAuthority
Hurricane Katrina water and sanitation collapseFlood2005-08-29 – 2005-09-30Documented record
Compiled record

Not shown on this chart

  • The 1976 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • The 2022 drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Yorkshire drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cantareira water crisis, São Paulo — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • Cape Town Day Zero — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
  • European drought — This event’s area does not contain this chart’s subject. Sharing a country is not sharing an event, so it is not drawn.
View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodCAMAS CREEK AT CAMAS ID (mm)
192728.0
192813.0
192910.0
19306.00
19313.00
193222.0
19338.00
19341.00
193513.0
193611.0
19377.00
193847.0
193919.0
194015.0
194115.0
194228.0
194340.0
194424.0
194542.0
194646.0
194746.0
194831.0
194925.0
195033.0
195134.0
195264.0
195337.0
195422.0
195527.0
195629.0
195744.0
195838.0
195915.0
196012.0
196111.0
196263.0
196319.0
196447.0
196560.0
196618.0
196761.0
196827.0
196980.0
197243.0
197342.0
197446.0
197549.0
197638.0
19773.00
197842.0
197915.0
198038.0
198137.0
198468.0
198524.0
19917.00
19925.00
199362.0
19946.00
199582.0
199641.0
199774.0
199877.0
199975.0
200025.0
20018.00
200210.0
200310.0
200415.0
200549.0
200684.0
200714.0
200828.0
200926.0
201011.0
201167.0
201217.0
20138.00
20140
20150
201614.0
201839.0
201934.0
202020.0
20211.00
20222.00
202352.0
202417.0

About this series

Everything below is a property of the data rather than a rating of it. There is deliberately no single confidence score: how much a gap matters depends on what you are about to do with the series, and only you know that.

Source
United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain
How the values came to existDerived Computed by Hydrionis
Period held1927–2024
Completeness89.8% of the periods in that span are held. Gaps are drawn as breaks and never interpolated.
Known gaps
  • 4 separate periods inside 1927–2024 hold no value. The longest runs from 1986 to 1990 — 5 years with no reading. They are drawn as breaks in the line and are never interpolated across.
ContinuityThe record begins in 1927 and is not continuous from it: 98 years separate the first value from the last, and 90% of the years between them are held. The span is not the record.
Inputs last read2026-10-01 · when the records this was computed from were last read from their publishers
Calculation date2026-08-24 · when the calculation method was last versioned, not a reading of any publisher
RedistributionPermitted by the upstream licences
Commercial reusePermitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this.
MethodologyHow this was produced

The snow standing above this water

1 automated snow station sits inside this drainage area, weighing the snowpack rather than measuring how deep it is.

747
Fullest snowpack recorded at Crab Creek, in 1983 (mm of water)
146
Thinnest, in 2015 (mm of water)
March
Month the pack is usually at its fullest
June
Month the pack has gone by, in half of years
Peak snowpack at Crab Creek
Water years 1982–2026. Each point is the fullest month of that snow season.
Peak snowpack at Crab CreekPeak snowpack at Crab Creek: Crab Creek in mm, from 1982 to 2026.0200400600800mm19821988199420002006201220182024Crab Creek 1982: 540 mmCrab Creek 1983: 747 mmCrab Creek 1984: 407 mmCrab Creek 1985: 347 mmCrab Creek 1986: 333 mmCrab Creek 1987: 199 mmCrab Creek 1988: 233 mmCrab Creek 1989: 534 mmCrab Creek 1990: 227 mmCrab Creek 1991: 232 mmCrab Creek 1992: 282 mmCrab Creek 1993: 466 mmCrab Creek 1994: 199 mmCrab Creek 1995: 569 mmCrab Creek 1996: 332 mmCrab Creek 1997: 492 mmCrab Creek 1998: 352 mmCrab Creek 1999: 446 mmCrab Creek 2000: 304 mmCrab Creek 2001: 208 mmCrab Creek 2002: 309 mmCrab Creek 2003: 237 mmCrab Creek 2004: 370 mmCrab Creek 2005: 417 mmCrab Creek 2006: 484 mmCrab Creek 2007: 208 mmCrab Creek 2008: 352 mmCrab Creek 2009: 312 mmCrab Creek 2010: 215 mmCrab Creek 2011: 452 mmCrab Creek 2012: 228 mmCrab Creek 2013: 274 mmCrab Creek 2014: 193 mmCrab Creek 2015: 146 mmCrab Creek 2016: 319 mmCrab Creek 2017: 329 mmCrab Creek 2018: 264 mmCrab Creek 2019: 426 mmCrab Creek 2020: 312 mmCrab Creek 2021: 226 mmCrab Creek 2022: 201 mmCrab Creek 2023: 477 mmCrab Creek 2024: 267 mmCrab Creek 2025: 245 mmCrab Creek 2026: 156 mm

A water year runs October to September and is named for the year it ends, so the snow of one winter stays in one point. The value is the fullest month, not the fullest day: a pack that peaked sharply mid-month reads lower here than a single measurement taken at the right moment would.

View the data behind this chart
Underlying data
PeriodCrab Creek (mm)
1982540
1983747
1984407
1985347
1986333
1987199
1988233
1989534
1990227
1991232
1992282
1993466
1994199
1995569
1996332
1997492
1998352
1999446
2000304
2001208
2002309
2003237
2004370
2005417
2006484
2007208
2008352
2009312
2010215
2011452
2012228
2013274
2014193
2015146
2016319
2017329
2018264
2019426
2020312
2021226
2022201
2023477
2024267
2025245
2026156

Read against the river

Crab Creek and CAMAS CREEK AT CAMAS ID both sit in this drainage area, and their records overlap by 43 years. That is the span the two have in common, not a count of years both actually hold — either record may have gaps inside it. The two are shown separately rather than on one axis: millimetres of stored water and cubic metres per second are not commensurable, and a difference between them would mean nothing.

Being in the same drainage area does not put the snowpack upstream of the gauge. A subbasin is an area, and snow on one tributary can join the river below a gauge on another — so a weak relationship here may say more about which tributary was measured than about the snow.

Every gauge Hydrionis holds within this area

Gauges within the Beaver-Camas and what each holds
GaugeMeasuresValuesRecord
CAMAS CREEK AT CAMAS IDburned area within 50 km, catchment area, annual maximum river flow, mean river flow, mean river flow, water year3051926–2026
BEAVER CREEK AT DUBOIS IDcatchment area, annual maximum river flow521922–2026
BEAVER CREEK NR CAMAS IDcatchment area, annual maximum river flow511924–2026

How these gauges were attached to this water

Assigned by the publisher to a numbered basin Every gauge here is assigned to this drainage area by its own publisher, which issues the area an official code — 17040214. A drainage area is not a river: it contains the tributaries as well as the main channel, and a gauge in it may be on any of them.

What each gauge’s link to this water rests on
GaugeEvidenceEstablished
CAMAS CREEK AT CAMAS IDStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
BEAVER CREEK AT DUBOIS IDStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02
BEAVER CREEK NR CAMAS IDStated by the publisher — USGS site service, huc_cd field — https://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/site/ ; named from the USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset 8-digit HU (Subbasin) layer — https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/wbd/MapServer/42026-10-02

What this record holds

Hydrionis decides which waters get a page, and which of those are offered to search, from what is actually held rather than from how the page reads. Five signals are counted; this record has 4 of them, which makes it a full profile.

Information-gain signals held for this water body
SignalHeldCounts
Gauges holding a real record3yes, 3 or more
Years spanned105yes, 20 or more
Values held948no
Distinct measurements6yes, 2 or more
Publishers measuring it2yes, 2 or more
Official identifiers1recorded, not counted

Use this data

Use this data

No bulk download is offered here, which is a licence position rather than a product one: at least one contributing publisher does not permit redistribution. The values can be read on the page, cited, and pointed to at source.

Attribution and citation

Suggested citation for Hydrionis

Hydrionis (2026), Beaver-Camas gauge records, accessed 2026-10-05, hydrionis.com/waters/united-states-beaver-camas/

Cite Hydrionis where you rely on values Hydrionis computed, on the method that produced them, or on the compilation itself. The underlying measurements remain the publishers’ and their attribution requirements apply to you directly.

Recommended, not required. Hydrionis does not claim rights over unmodified public data it relayed, and doing arithmetic on somebody else’s measurements does not make them Hydrionis’s. Cite the version and the access date: the Beaver-Camas gauge records changes as publishers release and as methods are revised, and a citation without both cannot be checked later. Full guidance is on cite and reuse.

None of the contributing licences requires attribution. Crediting the publishers is still good practice and they are listed above.

Where these figures come from

MeasuredHigh confidence2025-04-17

Source: USGS — National Water Information System, USGS site 13112000, annual peak streamflow. Licence: Open.

Method: The instantaneous maximum discharge of each water year as published by USGS, dated to the day it occurred. One value per October-to-September water year; where the publisher lists both a systematic and a historic peak for a year, the larger is the annual maximum. Values the publisher marks as maximum daily averages are not held here, because they are not instantaneous peaks. Values marked as bounded rather than measured are held as censored observations carrying the bound. Cubic feet per second are converted to cubic metres per second and the publisher unit is recorded alongside.

Rating curves are extrapolated at extreme discharges, so the largest values in a peak series carry the largest measurement uncertainty. Data from the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System, a work of the United States government and therefore in the public domain.

Retrieved 1 October 2026.