Storm overflows explained
Why combined sewers discharge to rivers at all, why recorded spills rose so sharply, and what would actually fix it.
Storm overflows are among the most contested topics in UK water. The engineering is not complicated, and understanding it clarifies both why they exist and why the numbers moved the way they did.
Why combined sewers exist
Victorian sewer builders had one pipe network to lay and two things to drain: foul sewage and rainfall runoff. They combined them. It was cheaper, it was the standard of the day, and it worked for the cities of the time.
That decision is now embedded in the ground beneath most older British cities, and beneath many European and North American ones. Separating the systems means rebuilding urban drainage, street by street, at a cost that has never been considered affordable.
Why overflows discharge
A combined sewer sized for foul flow plus ordinary rainfall cannot carry the flow from a heavy storm across a paved catchment. Something has to give. Without a relief point, the surcharge would back up through the lowest connections in the system — which are toilets in houses and basements.
The overflow is that relief point. It is a designed feature, not a malfunction, and the alternative it prevents is sewage flooding of homes, which is a considerably worse public health outcome than a diluted discharge to a river.
Why the recorded numbers rose
Event duration monitors were fitted to a small minority of English overflows in 2016 and to effectively all of them by 2023. Recorded spills rose over the same period.
Part of that rise is more measurement rather than more discharge. That is a genuine and important qualification, and it is not a defence: the monitoring revealed a scale of discharge that had simply not been quantified before, and much of it is not attributable to exceptional rainfall. Both things are true, and reporting that omits either is incomplete.
Counts depend on how many overflows are monitored. Monitoring coverage in England rose from a small minority of overflows to near-complete over roughly seven years, so an increase in recorded spills over that period is partly an increase in measurement.
View the data behind this chart
| Period | England (spills/yr) |
|---|---|
| 2020 | 403,000 |
| 2021 | 372,500 |
| 2022 | 301,000 |
| 2023 | 464,000 |
| 2024 | 450,000 |
What would actually fix it
| Measure | Effect | Relative cost |
|---|---|---|
| Sustainable drainage — permeable paving, swales, rain gardens | Reduces the runoff entering the sewer in the first place | Low to moderate, incremental |
| Removing surface water connections from foul sewers | Directly reduces combined flow | Moderate |
| Storage tanks at overflow sites | Holds storm flow for later treatment | High |
| Interception tunnels, as at Tideway | Captures overflow across a whole city | Very high |
| Full separation of foul and surface water | Eliminates the cause entirely | Prohibitive at national scale |
| Increased treatment works capacity | Allows more flow to be passed forward | High |
There is no cheap fix, which is the uncomfortable core of the issue. Every option costs money that ultimately comes from bills or from taxation, and the largest reductions come from the most expensive interventions.
Sources
- Environment Agency — Event Duration Monitoring — storm overflow spills. Open — attribution required · Open Government Licence v3.0
- Water Services Regulation Authority — Water company performance and price review data. Open — attribution required · Open Government Licence v3.0
- Water UK — Water UK industry statistics and company reporting. Public but restricted · Publisher terms — public access, reuse not clearly granted