Lk Nasworthy Nr San Angelo, TX
United States Geological Survey reservoir gauge 08132000 in TX, with published storage from 1930.
Storage now, against this reservoir's own record
Storage in September 2001 was around the middle of the Sep record, ranked against 72 other Seps held for this reservoir.
No percentage departure from the Sep average is published here. No long-term average is held for this month, so there is nothing to compare with.
Storage, 1930–2001
Monthly means of the publisher's daily record. Volume, not percentage of capacity — see below for why.
What the shaded periods are (0 events)
View the data behind this chart
| Period | Lk Nasworthy Nr San Angelo, TX (Mm³) |
|---|---|
| April 1930 | 0.273 |
| August 1930 | 5.31 |
| December 1930 | 13.0 |
| April 1931 | 13.0 |
| September 1931 | 11.8 |
| January 1932 | 13.2 |
| April 1932 | 12.7 |
| August 1932 | 11.8 |
| December 1932 | 12.3 |
| March 1933 | 12.0 |
| July 1933 | 10.1 |
| October 1933 | 7.52 |
| February 1934 | 12.3 |
| May 1934 | 10.9 |
| September 1934 | 6.64 |
| January 1935 | 7.66 |
| April 1935 | 11.4 |
| August 1935 | 11.3 |
| November 1935 | 12.1 |
| March 1936 | 11.9 |
| June 1936 | 12.8 |
| October 1936 | 2.44 |
| February 1937 | 10.8 |
| May 1937 | 10.6 |
| September 1937 | 9.91 |
| December 1937 | 10.9 |
| April 1938 | 11.0 |
| July 1938 | 8.87 |
| November 1938 | 11.0 |
| March 1939 | 10.3 |
| June 1939 | 10.1 |
| October 1939 | 8.74 |
| January 1940 | 11.2 |
| May 1940 | 10.3 |
| August 1940 | 10.8 |
| December 1940 | 9.51 |
| April 1941 | 10.6 |
| July 1941 | 10.7 |
| November 1941 | 10.6 |
| February 1942 | 9.90 |
| June 1942 | 11.3 |
| October 1942 | 10.7 |
| January 1943 | 10.5 |
| May 1943 | 10.7 |
| August 1943 | 7.81 |
| December 1943 | 11.3 |
| March 1944 | 10.7 |
| July 1944 | 8.46 |
| November 1944 | 10.3 |
| February 1945 | 10.8 |
| June 1945 | 8.14 |
| September 1945 | 8.54 |
| January 1946 | 9.75 |
| April 1946 | 9.89 |
| August 1946 | 6.03 |
| December 1946 | 10.1 |
| March 1947 | 9.69 |
| July 1947 | 10.2 |
| October 1947 | 4.01 |
| February 1948 | 5.64 |
| May 1948 | 6.74 |
| September 1948 | 9.39 |
| January 1949 | 13.3 |
| April 1949 | 15.8 |
| August 1949 | 10.9 |
| November 1949 | 16.4 |
| March 1950 | 16.1 |
| June 1950 | 15.1 |
| October 1950 | 15.1 |
| February 1951 | 12.4 |
| May 1951 | 7.97 |
| September 1951 | 9.29 |
| December 1951 | 4.75 |
| April 1952 | 3.39 |
| July 1952 | 4.42 |
| November 1952 | 1.59 |
| March 1953 | 10.3 |
| June 1953 | 12.7 |
| October 1953 | 16.9 |
| January 1954 | 15.2 |
| May 1954 | 16.5 |
| August 1954 | 10.8 |
| December 1954 | 2.00 |
| April 1955 | 0.680 |
| July 1955 | 12.6 |
| November 1955 | 11.6 |
| February 1956 | 9.24 |
| June 1956 | 12.3 |
| September 1956 | 5.64 |
| January 1957 | 9.74 |
| May 1957 | 13.1 |
| August 1957 | 12.2 |
| December 1957 | 15.2 |
| March 1958 | 15.4 |
| July 1958 | 14.9 |
| October 1958 | 14.7 |
| February 1959 | 15.1 |
| June 1959 | 13.7 |
| September 1959 | 12.4 |
| January 1960 | 15.3 |
| April 1960 | 15.2 |
| August 1960 | 12.3 |
| November 1960 | 12.3 |
| March 1961 | 15.3 |
| July 1961 | 15.4 |
| October 1961 | 14.8 |
| February 1962 | 15.0 |
| May 1962 | 14.7 |
| September 1962 | 8.13 |
| December 1962 | 4.89 |
| April 1963 | 2.78 |
| August 1963 | 1.02 |
| November 1963 | 0.576 |
| March 1964 | 0.974 |
| June 1964 | 0.603 |
| October 1964 | 6.34 |
| January 1965 | 7.88 |
| May 1965 | 7.43 |
| September 1965 | 10.0 |
| December 1965 | 8.08 |
| April 1966 | 6.85 |
| July 1966 | 12.7 |
| November 1966 | 12.9 |
| March 1967 | 12.8 |
| June 1967 | 12.8 |
| October 1967 | 13.1 |
| January 1968 | 12.5 |
| May 1968 | 12.9 |
| August 1968 | 11.8 |
| December 1968 | 10.2 |
| April 1969 | 10.0 |
| July 1969 | 11.4 |
| November 1969 | 12.8 |
| February 1970 | 12.6 |
| June 1970 | 12.6 |
| September 1970 | 10.7 |
| January 1971 | 10.6 |
| May 1971 | 11.3 |
| August 1971 | 14.3 |
| December 1971 | 13.0 |
| March 1972 | 12.9 |
| July 1972 | 13.0 |
| October 1972 | 13.3 |
| February 1973 | 13.8 |
| June 1973 | 12.9 |
| September 1973 | 13.5 |
| January 1974 | 12.8 |
| April 1974 | 13.0 |
| August 1974 | 13.1 |
| November 1974 | 12.9 |
| March 1975 | 13.4 |
| July 1975 | 12.9 |
| October 1975 | 13.0 |
| February 1976 | 13.0 |
| May 1976 | 13.1 |
| September 1976 | 13.1 |
| December 1976 | 12.8 |
| April 1977 | 13.1 |
| August 1977 | 12.9 |
| November 1977 | 13.0 |
| March 1978 | 13.3 |
| June 1978 | 13.1 |
| October 1978 | 12.9 |
| January 1979 | 12.9 |
| May 1979 | 12.9 |
| September 1979 | 12.8 |
| December 1979 | 13.0 |
| April 1980 | 12.9 |
| July 1980 | 12.9 |
| November 1980 | 13.3 |
| February 1981 | 12.8 |
| June 1981 | 12.8 |
| October 1981 | 13.7 |
| January 1982 | 12.8 |
| May 1982 | 12.7 |
| August 1982 | 12.9 |
| December 1982 | 11.3 |
| March 1983 | 11.1 |
| July 1983 | 13.0 |
| November 1983 | 12.9 |
| February 1984 | 12.8 |
| June 1984 | 13.0 |
| September 1984 | 12.6 |
| January 1985 | 14.0 |
| April 1985 | 12.0 |
| August 1985 | 12.2 |
| December 1985 | 12.3 |
| March 1986 | 12.0 |
| July 1986 | 12.2 |
| October 1986 | 13.6 |
| February 1987 | 15.0 |
| May 1987 | 13.7 |
| September 1987 | 14.3 |
| January 1988 | 13.8 |
| April 1988 | 13.6 |
| August 1988 | 13.4 |
| November 1988 | 13.3 |
| March 1989 | 14.7 |
| June 1989 | 13.8 |
| October 1989 | 13.6 |
| February 1990 | 13.6 |
| May 1990 | 13.2 |
| September 1990 | 14.3 |
| December 1990 | 13.1 |
| April 1991 | 13.4 |
| August 1991 | 14.1 |
| November 1991 | 13.3 |
| March 1992 | 14.5 |
| June 1992 | 14.3 |
| October 1992 | 10.8 |
| January 1993 | 8.16 |
| May 1993 | 13.9 |
| September 1993 | 13.9 |
| December 1993 | 13.5 |
| April 1994 | 13.7 |
| July 1994 | 13.7 |
| November 1994 | 13.7 |
| February 1995 | 13.5 |
| June 1995 | 13.7 |
| October 1995 | 11.0 |
| January 1996 | 11.0 |
| May 1996 | 11.0 |
| August 1996 | 10.8 |
| December 1996 | 10.2 |
| March 1997 | 11.6 |
| July 1997 | 11.0 |
| November 1997 | 11.2 |
| February 1998 | 10.9 |
| June 1998 | 11.0 |
| September 1998 | 10.9 |
| January 1999 | 11.0 |
| April 1999 | 11.0 |
| August 1999 | 10.9 |
| December 1999 | 10.6 |
| March 2000 | 10.3 |
| July 2000 | 10.8 |
| October 2000 | 8.87 |
| February 2001 | 10.8 |
| May 2001 | 10.8 |
| September 2001 | 11.1 |
Why this page shows a volume and not a percentage
Rate and persistence
Rates are computed only across an unbroken run of months, so a rate is never divided by a period in which some of the change was not observed. Percentile counts compare each month with the same calendar month in every other year held.
Location
About this data
About this data
| Source | United States Geological Survey — National Water Information System · US Government work — public domain |
|---|---|
| How the values came to exist | Measured |
| Period held | 1930–2001 |
| Completeness | 99.0% of the periods in that span are held. Gaps are drawn as breaks and never interpolated. |
| Known gaps |
|
| Continuity | 99% of the months between 1930 and 2001 are held. Monthly means of the publisher's own daily record. |
| Last read from the publisher | 2026-10-01 |
| Redistribution | Permitted by the upstream licences |
| Commercial reuse | Permitted by the upstream licences. No Hydrionis access tier can widen this. |
| Methodology | How this was produced |
Use this data
Use this data
- Machine-readable JSON
/api/v1/observations/by-subject/reservoir-usgs-08132000.json - How to cite this, and who you must credit
- How these figures were produced
- Request this at a different scale, format or geography
Attribution and citation
Suggested citation for Hydrionis
Hydrionis (2026), Lk Nasworthy Nr San Angelo, TX reservoir records, accessed 2026-10-05, hydrionis.com/reservoirs/reservoir-usgs-08132000/
Cite Hydrionis where you rely on the compilation, the normalisation, the eligibility judgements or a chart. Where you use an unmodified published value, the publisher’s attribution is the one that is required; crediting Hydrionis as well is welcome and is not something Hydrionis can require of you.
Where this comes from
Source: USGS — National Water Information System, 08132000. Licence: Open.
Method: Monthly mean of daily reservoir storage published by the USGS in acre-feet and converted to millions of cubic metres. Months with fewer than 20 days of record are not published rather than averaged from a partial month.
Reservoir storage is managed as well as observed: a drawdown may reflect an operating rule, flood-control rule curve or scheduled release rather than a shortage. Compare a month against the same month in other years, and do not read a fall as a supply signal without knowing the operating regime.
Retrieved 1 October 2026.
Monthly mean of daily reservoir storage published by the USGS in acre-feet and converted to millions of cubic metres. Months with fewer than 20 days of record are not published rather than averaged from a partial month.