Key facts

Contaminant group
Emerging contaminant
European Union — legal limit
100 ng/l for the sum of 20 PFAS; 500 ng/l for total PFAS
Under the recast Drinking Water Directive.
United States — legal limit
4 ng/l each for PFOA and PFOS
Set in 2024, with additional limits for several other compounds and a hazard index for mixtures. Substantially stricter than the EU sum approach.
United Kingdom — guideline
100 ng/l guideline for the sum of 48 PFAS
A DWI guideline tiered value triggering investigation and action, rather than a statutory limit.

Where it comes from

  • Aqueous film-forming firefighting foam, particularly at airports and military sites — the dominant cause of severe local groundwater contamination
  • Fluoropolymer and fluorochemical manufacturing
  • Stain and water repellent treatments on textiles and paper
  • Landfill leachate and wastewater treatment discharge, which concentrate rather than destroy PFAS

How it behaves in water

The shorter-chain compounds are extremely mobile and travel with groundwater almost unretarded. Longer-chain compounds sorb more strongly to organic matter. None break down appreciably in the environment on human timescales, which is the origin of the "forever chemicals" label.

How it is measured

Measured in nanograms per litre — parts per trillion — by LC-MS/MS. Analytical difficulty is real: laboratory background contamination from PTFE equipment is a genuine problem, and different jurisdictions count different numbers of compounds, so a "total PFAS" figure is only meaningful with its analyte list.

Regulatory position

Regulatory values for pfas
JurisdictionValueStatusNotes
European Union100 ng/l for the sum of 20 PFAS; 500 ng/l for total PFASlegal limitUnder the recast Drinking Water Directive.
United States4 ng/l each for PFOA and PFOSlegal limitSet in 2024, with additional limits for several other compounds and a hazard index for mixtures. Substantially stricter than the EU sum approach.
United Kingdom100 ng/l guideline for the sum of 48 PFASguidelineA DWI guideline tiered value triggering investigation and action, rather than a statutory limit.

Table sources

Health context

The European Food Safety Authority set a group tolerable weekly intake of 4.4 ng per kg of body weight for four PFAS in 2020, based on reduced vaccine response in children. Associations are also reported with elevated cholesterol, thyroid effects, and kidney and testicular cancer. The evidence base is evolving and limits have tightened repeatedly as a result.

What removes it

Treatment effectiveness
RowEffectiveNot reliably effective
1Granular activated carbon, effective for long-chain compounds and much less so for short-chainBoiling, which concentrates PFAS
2Ion exchange with PFAS-selective resinConventional coagulation, sedimentation and sand filtration
3Reverse osmosis and nanofiltration, the most reliable across the whole familyChlorination, ozonation and UV disinfection
4Destruction of the concentrated waste stream is a separate and unsolved problemBiological treatment

Occurrence

Systematic monitoring under the US Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule provides the largest occurrence dataset, and detects PFAS in supplies serving a substantial share of the US population.

Relationships

    Related intelligence

    Sources